Loading policy item
SB 1535
The enrolled bill makes the Employment Related Day Care subsidy program’s automatic waitlist bypass for families receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families optional rather than mandatory, allowing the Department of Early Learning and Care to pause that bypass to control caseload growth. It codifies eligibility criteria, shifts provider payments from attendance to enrollment with a late-payment penalty, caps family copayments at seven percent of household income, and directs DELC to convene a temporary workgroup to study child care liability insurance costs. Materially, this shifts funding allocation away from TANF families who would otherwise bypass the waitlist, potentially extending their access timelines while stabilizing the program’s budget and provider cash flow.
Generated explanation · Enrolled · Analyzed 8/21/2026 · Open official Enrolled text
Generated analysis of Enrolled text; it does not establish that the bill applies to you. Read the full decision brief.
No upcoming event is verified in the available records.
Enactment and effective dates are separate. Effective dates have not been verified here; provisions may take effect at different times. Check the official text.
Plain-language analysis
Generated analysis, not an official summary or legal advice. Confirm with linked Oregon documents.
This measure became law. Enactment does not establish that every provision is already effective; check each effective date in the official text.
The enrolled bill makes the Employment Related Day Care subsidy program’s automatic waitlist bypass for families receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families optional rather than mandatory, allowing the Department of Early Learning and Care to pause that bypass to control caseload growth. It codifies eligibility criteria, shifts provider payments from attendance to enrollment with a late-payment penalty, caps family copayments at seven percent of household income, and directs DELC to convene a temporary workgroup to study child care liability insurance costs. Materially, this shifts funding allocation away from TANF families who would otherwise bypass the waitlist, potentially extending their access timelines while stabilizing the program’s budget and provider cash flow.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Official fiscal analysis states the measure enables DELC to temporarily pause the TANF bypass to help control caseload growth and stay within budget, as prior eligibility expansions led to rapid, unsustainable program expansion that exceeded sustainable service capacity.
Basis: Official analysis · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The statutory combination of an optional TANF priority, a strict seven percent copayment cap, and enrollment-based provider payments suggests a legislative intent to balance fiscal sustainability with household affordability. By removing mandatory bypasses and capping out-of-pocket costs, the text likely aims to prevent program insolvency while ensuring that remaining subsidy dollars are distributed equitably across diverse facility types and income levels without triggering emergency supplemental appropriations.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
May lose automatic waitlist bypass, requiring them to enter the general ERDC queue unless DELC rules reinstate priority. This alters access timelines and may delay care placement.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Will receive state payments based on enrollment rather than attendance, with a nine percent late-payment penalty if the state misses specified disbursement dates. Providers may qualify for higher reimbursement rates for specialized care but must comply with updated background registry and incentive rules.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Gains administrative discretion over caseload management and waitlist bypasses. Must draft rules for sliding-scale copayments, incentive distribution, and payment timing, and must convene a multi-agency workgroup to study liability insurance until its 2029 sunset.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Will be studied by a state workgroup exploring cost-reduction strategies and liability immunity options, though no immediate rate changes or regulatory exemptions are mandated.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Eligibility and access timelines for TANF families will depend on DELC rulemaking rather than statutory guarantee, creating administrative uncertainty during the transition.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Provider cash flow will stabilize through enrollment-based payments, but accurate attendance tracking and compliance with background registry requirements become mandatory for reimbursement eligibility.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
The Legislative Revenue Office confirms no direct state or local revenue impact, but DELC projects cost savings from a projected 2.6 percent monthly natural attrition rate among TANF families if the bypass is paused.
Basis: Official analysis · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Copayment rules are capped at seven percent of household income, reducing out-of-pocket risk for families but requiring DELC to implement and monitor a sliding-scale calculation system.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
ERDC program and middle-income families
DELC successfully pauses the TANF bypass, reducing caseload by twenty percent and preventing program insolvency. This stabilizes funding for remaining slots, allowing sustained subsidies for working families who previously waited indefinitely, while enrollment-based payments prevent provider bankruptcies during economic downturns.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
TANF families and vulnerable providers
DELC indefinitely suspends the TANF bypass without transparent rulemaking, leaving thousands of low-income parents without affordable care, forcing school attendance disruptions or unpaid leave. Simultaneously, a provider unable to secure liability insurance due to market conditions faces closure after the workgroup study yields no actionable policy changes before its 2029 sunset.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
The text grants broad administrative discretion over priority qualification and copayment structures, which lacks explicit audit triggers or appeal timelines. Weak enforcement of the anti-discrimination clause could allow discretionary denial to function as a de facto eligibility barrier.
Sources · Enrolled
The measure trades guaranteed, expedited child care access for TANF families in exchange for fiscal control and caseload sustainability for the ERDC program.
Prevents program overextension by aligning caseload growth with available funding.
Basis: Official analysis · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Stabilizes provider revenue through enrollment-based payments and introduces a late-payment penalty to incentivize timely state disbursements.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Initiates a targeted, time-limited study of liability insurance market barriers with potential policy recommendations.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Prolongs wait times for vulnerable households reliant on TANF, with access dependent on future agency rulemaking rather than statutory guarantee.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Creates administrative uncertainty for providers awaiting DELC rules on incentive distribution, copayment calculations, and payment timing.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Relies on discretionary agency action to manage demand, which may lack transparency or consistent application across regions.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
The enrolled text is substantively identical to the Senate Amendments version. The only visible change is editorial cleanup of bracketed notation in Section 1(5)(b)(B), removing `[shall]` before `may give priority`, which does not alter the permissive nature of the TANF priority provision already present in the previous draft.
Editorial removal of bracketed `[shall]` before `may give priority` for TANF families. No substantive shift in statutory discretion.
none
Sources · Enrolled; Senate Amendments to Introduced
No changes. Late-payment penalty remains nine percent; enrollment-based payment structure unchanged.
none
Sources · Enrolled; Senate Amendments to Introduced
No changes. Workgroup composition, reporting deadline (November 1, 2027), and sunset date (January 2, 2029) remain identical.
none
Sources · Enrolled; Senate Amendments to Introduced
Tradeoff: The enrolled text preserves the Senate Amendments version’s core tradeoff: discretionary caseload management for TANF families in exchange for program fiscal sustainability and provider payment stability.
Model self-rating: high. The enrolled text is substantively identical to the Senate Amendments version, with only minor editorial cleanup. Official fiscal and revenue impact statements confirm no direct revenue change and explicitly identify the TANF bypass pause as the primary caseload control mechanism. This is the model’s assessment of its own analysis, not independent verification or human review.
Possible effects if adopted; not current bill text.
This proposal has not become law. The generated effects below describe what it would require if enacted.
The measure codifies comprehensive rulemaking authority for the Early Learning Council over Oregon’s Employment Related Day Care (ERDC) subsidy program, mandating enrollment-based payments, capping family copayments at 7% of household income, protecting eligibility regardless of immigration status, and guaranteeing a 12-month benefit continuation period. It also would direct the Department of Early Learning and Care to convene a multi-agency work group to study child care liability insurance costs and report policy options by November 2027. Materially, it would shift subsidy administration toward predictable provider revenue streams and expanded eligibility stability while creating a temporary state task force to address rising insurance burdens for providers.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The statutory emphasis on enrollment-based payments, 12-month benefit continuity, and a dedicated liability insurance study suggests a policy objective to stabilize child care provider revenue streams and reduce administrative churn that may be contributing to program caseload growth and provider attrition.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Eligibility would expand to include risk of needing protective, homelessness, or domestic violence services. Copayments are capped at 7% of household income. Benefits cannot be terminated for 12 months after initial qualification, and immigration status is explicitly protected from eligibility determinations.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Receive monthly subsidy payments based on child enrollment rather than attendance, with a statutory 9% penalty for late departmental payments. Providers participating in quality recognition systems may receive financial incentives. The measure triggers a state study on liability insurance costs that could lead to future rate adjustments or coverage reforms.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Gains rulemaking authority to implement statutory requirements, including managing eligibility criteria, payment structures, and incentive programs. would have to convene and fund a multi-agency work group on liability insurance by November 2027.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Providers would have to maintain Central Background Registry enrollment for all relevant individuals to qualify for subsidies. Families would have to meet one of the five independent eligibility bases. DELC would have to adopt rules capping copayments and structuring payments by enrollment.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
The 7% copayment cap and enrollment-based payments would likely increase per-child subsidy costs for the state while reducing provider revenue volatility. The optional TANF priority would allow DELC to manage caseload growth within budget constraints.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Senate Amendments to Introduced; Fiscal Impact Statement A
Eligibility protections for noncitizens and risk-based criteria would likely broaden access. The 12-month continuation would reduce benefit cliffs but may delay caseload attrition. Federal fund supremacy ensures compliance with federal child care regulations where applicable.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Vulnerable family with fluctuating employment and recent domestic violence involvement
Potential effect if enacted: Qualifies under the new risk-based eligibility criteria, receives enrollment-based payments that prevent provider revenue loss during absences, and maintains uninterrupted care for 12 months while copayments remain strictly capped at 7% of income.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Small rural provider relying on attendance-based billing
Faces sudden cash flow disruption if DELC implements strict enrollment-based payments without adequate transition funding or rate adjustments, potentially forcing temporary closures until the state would adjust reimbursement formulas to account for higher baseline costs.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
The text would permit administrative discretion and deferred insurance reforms; abuse would stem from inconsistent rule implementation or future legislative adoption of weakened accountability measures.
Sources · Senate Amendments to Introduced
Potential effect if enacted: The measure trades predictable, stabilized subsidy payments and expanded eligibility protections for families against potential increases in state per-child costs and administrative complexity for DELC, while deferring liability insurance cost solutions to a future study rather than mandating immediate rate reforms.
Potential effect if enacted: Reduced provider revenue volatility through enrollment-based payments and late-payment penalties.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Potential effect if enacted: Broader access for vulnerable populations via risk-based eligibility criteria and immigration status protections.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Clearer benefit continuity would reduce administrative churn and supports family stability.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Potential effect if enacted: Constrained copayment flexibility may limit program sustainability without additional funding.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Optional TANF priority could slow caseload attrition during budget shortfalls.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Potential effect if enacted: Deferred insurance cost mitigation leaves providers exposed until 2027.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Model self-rating: high. Analysis is grounded exclusively in the provided Senate Amendment bill text and official legislative fiscal/staff summaries. No external speculation or unverified claims are included. This is the model’s assessment of its own analysis, not independent verification or human review.
Decision brief generation failed. The existing briefs were preserved and this version can be retried.
Decision brief generation failed. The existing briefs were preserved and this version can be retried.
This proposal has not become law. The generated effects below describe what it would require if enacted.
The amendment would restructure Oregon’s Employment Related Day Care subsidy program by establishing independent eligibility pathways for vulnerable populations, capping family copays at 7 percent of income, shifting provider payments from attendance-based to enrollment-based models, and making automatic waitlist priority for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families optional. It also would create a temporary legislative workgroup to study and propose solutions for rising liability insurance costs for early learning providers.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Fiscal Impact Statement A
The measure enables the Department of Early Learning and Care to temporarily pause the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families waitlist bypass to control caseload growth and stay within budget, as prior eligibility expansions led to unsustainable program expansion exceeding sustainable capacity.
Basis: Official analysis · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The text shifts Temporary Assistance for Needy Families priority from mandatory to optional while adding independent eligibility bases for families at risk of homelessness or domestic violence, suggesting an intent to balance fiscal sustainability with broader access for high-risk populations while stabilizing provider revenue through enrollment-based reimbursement.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Eligibility would expand to include those at risk of homelessness, domestic violence, or teen pregnancy. Copays are capped at 7 percent of household income. Automatic waitlist priority for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families becomes optional. Benefits continue for a minimum of 12 months after initial qualification.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Reimbursement shifts to enrollment-based rather than attendance-based, improving revenue predictability. Providers may qualify for higher rates or incentives for offering specialized care, participating in quality recognition systems, or serving historically underserved populations. All operators would have to maintain Central Background Registry enrollment.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Mandated to adopt comprehensive rules covering equity, eligibility, payment structures, and quality incentives. Required to convene a liability insurance workgroup with specific diversity and composition requirements and submit findings by November 1, 2027.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Families would have to navigate new independent eligibility pathways rather than relying solely on income or employment status. Providers would have to adjust billing systems to enrollment-based models and potentially invest in quality recognition programs to access incentives.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
The Early Learning Council would have to draft rules ensuring equitable access across cultural, linguistic, and racial demographics while aligning with federal recommendations for income eligibility and market access. Federal funding rules override state provisions where applicable.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
A 7 percent copay cap would reduce out-of-pocket expenses for low-income families but may increase total program expenditure if caseload would expand. Enrollment-based payments reduce provider cash-flow volatility but require state reimbursement adjustments. Optional Temporary Assistance for Needy Families priority may slow caseload growth.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Fiscal Impact Statement A
The 12-month continuation period would reduce benefit churn but may delay access for families whose circumstances change before the initial qualification window closes.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Families fleeing domestic violence or homelessness
Potential effect if enacted: A family qualifies immediately under the new independent eligibility basis, receives enrollment-based payments that guarantee provider continuity, and accesses a culturally specific facility with higher reimbursement rates, enabling stable employment and housing recovery.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families-eligible households
A household is deprioritized when the department exercises the optional bypass pause, faces an extended waitlist gap without interim care, and loses access to subsidies before the 12-month continuation rule would apply, exacerbating housing instability or job loss.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Fiscal Impact Statement A
Potential effect if enacted: The distinction between permissible administrative discretion and potential unlawful exclusion or misclassification hinges on rulemaking transparency and consistent application of eligibility documentation standards.
Sources · Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Expanding eligibility and stabilizing provider payments through enrollment-based reimbursement improves access and continuity but risks program cost growth and delayed Temporary Assistance for Needy Families family access if priority considerations are deprioritized. Upsides include a broader safety net for vulnerable families, predictable provider revenue, and reduced copay burden. Downsides include potential caseload expansion beyond sustainable levels, optional Temporary Assistance for Needy Families bypass creating access delays, and administrative complexity in rulemaking and federal compliance.
Potential effect if enacted: Broader safety net for families at risk of homelessness, domestic violence, or teen pregnancy.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Predictable provider revenue through enrollment-based payments and targeted quality incentives.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Reduced copay burden capped at 7 percent of household income.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Potential caseload expansion beyond sustainable levels if copay caps and eligibility expansions outpace funding.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Potential effect if enacted: Optional Temporary Assistance for Needy Families bypass creating access delays for low-income families.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Fiscal Impact Statement A
Potential effect if enacted: Administrative complexity in rulemaking, federal compliance alignment, and incentive distribution monitoring.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Model self-rating: high. The amendment text explicitly codifies eligibility pathways, payment structures, and copay limits. Fiscal analysis confirms caseload control as the primary driver. Workgroup composition and deadlines are clearly specified. This is the model’s assessment of its own analysis, not independent verification or human review.
41 records currently loaded
Records available in the current snapshot.
Earliest loaded signal
Introduced bill text posted
Posted Jan 28, 2026, 3:25 PM PST
AI-assessed adopted replacement
The adopted rewrite removes the generic study and establishes operative child-care subsidy policy plus a specific work group.
AI assessment dated 2026-09-29. This classification is separate from enactment and legal effect.
Evidence snapshot: 2026-09-29. Later legislative records are not automatically reassessed.
Policy purpose: substantially changed.
Reviewer: /root/review_recent_a · 2026-09-29
AI-assessed adopted replacement
The adopted rewrite removes the generic study and establishes operative child-care subsidy policy plus a specific work group.
Policy purpose: substantially changed.
“SECTION 1. The Department of Early Learning and Care shall study child care. The de- 5 partment shall submit a report in the manner provided by ORS 192.245, and may include 6 recommendations for legislation, to the interim committees of the Legislative Assembly re- 7 lated to child care no later than September 15, 2027”
Introduced
“SECTION 1. ORS 329A.500 is amended to read: 6 329A.500. (1) As used in this section, “family” means any individual who is responsible for the 7 care, control and supervision of a child. 8 (2) The Early Learning Council shall adopt rules for the operation of the Employment Related 9 Day Care subsidy program and for ”
A-Engrossed
Reviewer: /root/review_recent_b · 2026-09-29
AI-assessed adopted replacement
The adopted -2 amendment removes the generic study and enacts an immediate subsidy-eligibility change.
Policy purpose: substantially changed.
“SECTION 1. The Department of Early Learning and Care shall study child care. The de- 5 partment shall submit a report in the manner provided by ORS 192.245, and may include 6 recommendations for legislation, to the interim committees of the”
Introduced
“SECTION 1. ORS 329A.500 is amended to read: 6 329A.500. (1) As used in this section, “family” means any individual who is responsible for the 7 care, control and supervision of a child. 8 (2) The Early Learning Council shall adopt rules for the operation of the Employment Related 9 Day Care subs”
A-Engrossed
“Gut and stuff” research tracks substantial replacements of a bill’s substantive text. Policy change is assessed separately: a rewrite can retain the same purpose. A proposed amendment is counted as adopted only when the official evidence supports adoption.
Two subscription subagents independently examine the same official evidence without seeing each other’s answers. An additional subagent can adjudicate disagreements against the sources. Unsupported conclusions, missing evidence, and unresolved disagreements remain uncertain. Agreement is not a guarantee of accuracy.
Session totals count each HB or SB once, including bills that did not become law. Resolutions and memorials are excluded. Counts describe the research inventory, independent of your search, interests, following, and status filters. Missing or unassessed bills are not negative findings.
The replacement watch is a rule, not an AI assessment: a bill whose introduced text is a short study bill (a study word, at most three sections, under 400 words) or a blank form (a run of blanks, 300 words or fewer) is listed once a proposed amendment is posted for it. In the 2021 to 2026 training sessions, 271 of 374 such bills were later replaced; the rate is historical and says nothing about a particular bill’s intent.
Assessments are published research snapshots. Opening this page reads saved research and does not run an AI review. Refreshes require another evidence export, independent assessment, and validated import; reports do not continuously refresh. Each bill’s evidence and reviewer provenance are available on its detail page.
Follow the official text for SB 1535 and every amendment branch. Connections come from each amendment's stated base. Horizontal position shows when each document was first posted, when available. Dotted links flag likely related proposals based on their text.
Click a card to isolate its connected lines; use View summary to jump to its details. Horizontal position shows first posting time in Pacific Time. Drag or use the arrow keys to pan. Pinch with two fingers on mobile, or zoom with the controls, +/− keys, or Control/Command + scroll; press 0 to reset. Dashed branches remained proposals. Dotted teal links are text-based early signals, not official amendment relationships.
Selected document summary
Substantial replacement
What the document says to change
Delete lines 4 through 8 and insert:
Inferred policy relationships
Likely revised proposal · Amendment -2
High confidence from shared inserted text: ORS 329, ORS 412.006, Effective date.
This is a text-based early signal, not an official statement that one amendment changes the other.
Official records (1)
No deeper official pre-number history was found.
The text changed substantially while keeping measure number SB 1535.
Chief sponsors: Senator Dick Anderson
Regular sponsors: Senator David Brock Smith
Senate carrier
Senator Dick Anderson
Third Reading Of Senate Measures · Version A
House carrier
Representative Ricki Ruiz
Third Reading Of Senate Bills · Version A
A carrier presents the measure or report but is not necessarily its sponsor or author.
Records already listed in Activity are not repeated here.
Official origin records are incomplete; missing facts are not inferred.
41 events
Full timeline
41 entries shown.
Effective date, June 5, 2026.
Chapter 82, 2026 Laws.
Governor signed.
Speaker signed.
President signed.
Third reading. Carried by Ruiz. Passed.
Ayes, 52; Excused, 4--Hartman, Javadi, Levy B, Valderrama; Excused for Business of the House, 4--Boshart Davis, Breese-Iverson, Diehl, Smith G.
Rules suspended. Carried over to March 4, 2026 Calendar.
Second reading.
Recommendation: Do pass.
Staff Measure Summary · Version A
Referred to Ways and Means.
First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
Third reading. Carried by Anderson. Passed.
Ayes, 24; Nays, 1--Robinson; Excused, 5--Hayden, Linthicum, Taylor, Thatcher, Weber.
Second reading.
Recommendation: Do pass the A-Eng. bill.
Work Session held.
Work Session
Heard and Reported Out · Agenda item 9 · Room HR 40 · Relating to child care; prescribing an effective date (Senator Sollman, carrier)
Returned to Full Committee.
Work Session held.
Work Session
Heard and Reported Out · Agenda item 4 · Room HR G · Relating to child care; prescribing an effective date - ADDED
Assigned to Subcommittee On Education.
Senate Amendments to Introduced bill text posted
Referred to Ways and Means by order of the President.
Recommendation: Do pass with amendments and be referred to Ways and Means. (Printed A-Eng.)
Public Hearing and Work Session held.
Public Hearing and Work Session
Heard and Reported Out with Amendments · Agenda item 1 · Room HR E · CARRIED OVER FROM THE 2/10/2026 MEETING: Please note: this public hearing of SB 1568 is scheduled solely for the purpose of hearing testimony from the people who previously signed up to testify at the meeting on 2/10/2026. Requires the Department of Early Learning and Care to study child care.
IS_Impact SB 1535 2
Revenue Impact Statement
Amendment -2 adopted
Public Hearing held.
Public Hearing
Heard · Agenda item 2 · Room HR E · Requires the Department of Early Learning and Care to study child care.
Amendment -2 proposed
Amendment -1 proposed
Referred to Early Childhood and Behavioral Health.
Introduction and first reading. Referred to President's desk.
ligibility for subsidized child care and increased subsidy reimbursement rates. HB 2683 (2023) directed DELC to adopt rules to expand program access to higher income l
within budget. In recent years, the Legislature has expanded ERDC eligibility. HB 3073 (2021) expanded family eligibility for subsidized child care and increased subs
y EFFECT OF AMENDMENT: The amendment replaces the measure. BACKGROUND: In 2021, House Bill 3073 established DELC to provide early learning and child care services in Oregon. D
the measure is minimal EFFECT OF AMENDMENT: No amendment. BACKGROUND: In 2021, House Bill 3073 established DELC to provide early learning and child care services in Oregon. D
the measure is minimal EFFECT OF AMENDMENT: No amendment. BACKGROUND: In 2021, House Bill 3073 established DELC to provide early learning and child care services in Oregon. D
Source title: Allows the Early Learning Council to modify the priority given to families receiving temporary assistance for needy families for participation in the Employment Related Day Care subsidy program.This source title may describe an earlier version. Read the current brief and version history above.
“Effective date, June 5, 2026.”
Confirm with the official record.
Supplemental, source-linked analysis from project researchers and community contributors. It is separate from Oregon's official record.