Loading policy item
HB 4014
This proposal did not become law. The engrossed bill would have created a temporary, eleven-member task force to study and report on potential changes to Oregon’s tax code regarding international income, replacing an earlier proposal that would have directed the Legislative Revenue Officer alone to conduct a broad study of the state financial system. Material consequence: It would have shifted analytical responsibility from a single agency directive to a structured legislative body with a fixed 2026 reporting deadline and 2027 sunset, potentially accelerating policy analysis on international taxation while introducing new administrative coordination requirements.
Generated explanation · A-Engrossed · Analyzed 8/21/2026 · Open official A-Engrossed text
Replacement likely. This short study bill has 2 proposed amendments, the first Amendment -1 posted Feb 10, 2026 for the Feb 11, 2026 meeting. In 2021 to 2026 sessions, 271 of 374 shell-shaped bills that reached this point were replaced (72%), a median 14 days before adoption; 17% of shell-shaped bills overall were. This is a historical rate, not a finding about this bill.
This proposal did not become law.
Generated analysis of A-Engrossed text; it does not establish that the bill applies to you. Read the full decision brief.
No upcoming event is verified in the available records.
Plain-language analysis
Generated analysis, not an official summary or legal advice. Confirm with linked Oregon documents.
This proposal did not become law. The generated effects below describe what it would have required if enacted.
The engrossed bill would have created a temporary, eleven-member task force to study and report on potential changes to Oregon’s tax code regarding international income, replacing an earlier proposal that would have directed the Legislative Revenue Officer alone to conduct a broad study of the state financial system. Material consequence: It would have shifted analytical responsibility from a single agency directive to a structured legislative body with a fixed 2026 reporting deadline and 2027 sunset, potentially accelerating policy analysis on international taxation while introducing new administrative coordination requirements.
Basis: Bill text · Sources: A-Engrossed; Introduced
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The shift from a broad financial system study to a targeted task force suggests an intent to concentrate legislative analysis specifically on international income treatment following recent federal tax policy modifications.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Staff Measure Summary A; Staff Measure Summary A; Staff Measure Summary A
Would have had to reallocate existing staff resources to provide dedicated part-time support for the task force and coordinate with interim committees.
Basis: Bill text · Sources: A-Engrossed; Fiscal Impact Statement A
Six legislative members receive per diem and travel reimbursement; five non-legislative members serve as unpaid volunteers unless meeting specific state qualification criteria, which might have limited participation to those with independent means or employer support.
Basis: Bill text · Source: A-Engrossed
Potential effect if enacted: Subject to potential future tax code changes regarding international income treatment based on the task force's findings, though no immediate compliance or reporting obligations are imposed by this text.
Basis: Bill text · Source: A-Engrossed
Potential effect if enacted: Receive the task force report by December 1, 2026, for potential legislative action or further study.
Basis: Bill text · Source: A-Engrossed
Administrative burden on LRO would have required part-time assignment of one Economist and one Committee Assistant, with potential need for additional General Fund resources if cumulative interim work exceeds 2025-27 budget assumptions.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Accelerated reporting deadline (December 2026) would have required focused monthly meetings over six to eight months, limiting extended deliberation periods.
Basis: Bill text · Sources: A-Engrossed; Fiscal Impact Statement A
All state agencies would have had to assist the task force and furnish information as permitted by confidentiality laws, creating a mandatory interagency cooperation obligation without additional funding.
Basis: Bill text · Source: A-Engrossed
Oregon Economy & Tax Base
Task force successfully would have identified a simplified territorial taxation model that attracts significant corporate investment to Oregon, substantially increasing the tax base without raising statutory rates.
Basis: Inferred · Source: A-Engrossed
Policy Quality & Legislative Follow-through
Potential effect if enacted: Unpaid volunteer requirement deters qualified technical experts from participating, resulting in a report dominated by legislative staff perspectives that fails to address complex international tax compliance issues, leading to poorly drafted follow-up legislation.
Basis: Inferred · Source: A-Engrossed
The broad directive to assist and furnish information, combined with volunteer compensation limits, would have created structural conditions where confidentiality boundaries might have been tested or expertise gaps might have been filled by unqualified actors seeking access.
Sources · A-Engrossed
Potential effect if enacted: Accelerating targeted analysis of international taxation through a dedicated task force improves policy focus but risks limited expert participation due to unpaid volunteer requirements and potential resource strain on existing legislative staff. Upsides include focused expertise, a faster reporting timeline, and structured multi-stakeholder input. Downsides include unpaid membership potentially skewing representation, administrative burden on the LRO, and no guaranteed funding for expanded workloads.
Potential effect if enacted: Focused expertise on international income taxation rather than broad financial system analysis.
Basis: Bill text · Source: A-Engrossed
Potential effect if enacted: Accelerated reporting deadline enables earlier legislative consideration of potential tax code changes.
Basis: Bill text · Source: A-Engrossed
Unpaid volunteer requirement might have detered qualified technical experts from participating.
Basis: Bill text · Source: A-Engrossed
Potential effect if enacted: Administrative burden on LRO and Legislative Assembly budgets without dedicated funding streams.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
The introduced version directed the Legislative Revenue Officer alone to conduct a broad study of the entire state financial system, with a December 2027 report deadline and January 2028 sunset. The engrossed version replaces this with a dedicated eleven-member task force, narrows the scope exclusively to international income tax treatment, accelerates the reporting deadline to December 2026, extends the sunset to December 2027, and establishes specific appointment procedures, voting structures, and volunteer compensation rules.
Shifted from a single-agency directive to a multi-member legislative task force with defined voting and quorum requirements.
Increases stakeholder input but adds administrative complexity and coordination requirements.
Sources · A-Engrossed; Introduced
Narrowed mandate from 'state financial system' to 'taxation of international income' and broader potential statutory changes on that topic.
Focuses legislative analysis on a specific, technically complex area rather than broad fiscal policy.
Sources · A-Engrossed; Introduced
Accelerated reporting deadline from December 2027 to December 2026; sunset extended from January 2028 to December 2027.
Compresses the study timeline while extending the task force's operational lifespan for follow-up coordination.
Sources · A-Engrossed; Introduced
Added specific appointment rules, nonvoting legislative member restrictions, and volunteer compensation provisions.
Creates a structured governance framework but limits paid participation to legislative members only.
Sources · A-Engrossed
Tradeoff: Accelerating targeted analysis of international taxation through a dedicated task force improves policy focus but risks limited expert participation due to unpaid volunteer requirements and potential resource strain on existing legislative staff. Upsides include focused expertise, a faster reporting timeline, and structured multi-stakeholder input. Downsides include unpaid membership potentially skewing representation, administrative burden on the LRO, and no guaranteed funding for expanded workloads.
Model self-rating: high. Analysis is grounded exclusively in the provided engrossed bill text, official fiscal/revenue impact statements, and staff measure summaries addressing this exact version. No external speculation or unverified claims are included. This is the model’s assessment of its own analysis, not independent verification or human review.
Possible effects if adopted; not current bill text.
This proposal has not become law. The generated effects below describe what it would require if enacted.
HB 4014 would establish a temporary, 11-member Task Force on Taxation of International Income to study whether Oregon’s tax code should be modified to improve or simplify the treatment of international income, with a report due December 1, 2026, and an automatic sunset on December 31, 2027. The measure would impose no immediate revenue impact but would direct state agencies to assist the task force and assigns staff support to the Legislative Revenue Office within existing budgets, creating a fixed timeline for potential future legislative action on cross-border business taxation.
Basis: Inferred · Source: House Amendments to Introduced
Official staff analysis indicates the measure addresses long-standing legislative debate over how Oregon taxes international business income, specifically noting that a study on state finance should explore funding new spending through tax expenditure elimination, and highlighting the value of analyzing complicated aspects of Oregon tax law.
Basis: Official analysis · Source: Staff Measure Summary A
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The statutory mandate to investigate whether changes could improve or simplify the state’s tax treatment of international income suggests a hypothesis that current rules may be misaligned with recent federal updates (e.g., NCTI/FDDEI) or create compliance friction for cross-border businesses, prompting a review to maintain economic competitiveness or administrative efficiency.
Basis: Inferred · Source: House Amendments to Introduced
Potential effect if enacted: Appointed as voting members to advise on tax policy impacts; non-legislative appointees serve unpaid unless qualified under ORS 292.495.
Basis: Inferred · Source: House Amendments to Introduced
Assigned part-time staff support to facilitate task force operations without additional funding, though cumulative interim work could trigger future General Fund requests.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Potential effect if enacted: Potentially subject to future statutory changes or simplified compliance frameworks based on the task force’s December 2026 report.
Basis: Inferred · Source: House Amendments to Introduced
Potential effect if enacted: Legally directed to provide information and advice to the task force, constrained only by existing confidentiality laws.
Basis: Inferred · Source: House Amendments to Introduced
Potential effect if enacted: The task force operates on a volunteer basis for non-legislative members, who receive no compensation or expense reimbursement unless they qualify under ORS 292.495.
Basis: Inferred · Source: House Amendments to Introduced
Legislative Revenue Office costs are absorbed within current service-level budgets, though cumulative interim work could trigger future General Fund requests.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
State agencies would have to comply with information requests to the extent confidentiality laws allow, creating a binding administrative obligation during the task force’s active period.
Basis: Inferred · Source: House Amendments to Introduced
The December 1, 2026 reporting deadline would create a fixed timeline for potential legislative action on international income taxation, while the December 31, 2027 sunset ensures the body dissolves automatically without renewal.
Basis: Inferred · Source: House Amendments to Introduced
Oregon multinational corporations and state budget
The task force would identify a streamlined territorial taxation model that would significantly reduce compliance costs for Oregon multinational corporations, attracting new corporate headquarters and generating sustained long-term revenue growth without raising rates.
Basis: Inferred · Source: House Amendments to Introduced
Small and mid-sized Oregon businesses with international supply chains
Potential effect if enacted: Recommendations result in complex new reporting requirements or expanded tax nexus rules that disproportionately burden these businesses, increasing administrative costs and creating unintended cross-border tax liabilities.
Basis: Inferred · Source: House Amendments to Introduced
The text does not authorize unlawful data sharing; harm would stem from administrative misclassification or scope expansion rather than the statute itself.
Sources · House Amendments to Introduced
Potential effect if enacted: The measure trades minimal immediate fiscal cost and administrative oversight for a structured, time-limited review that may yield future tax code adjustments affecting international business taxation in Oregon.
Expert-driven analysis could simplify compliance or improve revenue alignment without upfront costs.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Recommendations might inadvertently increase regulatory complexity or create unintended tax liabilities for businesses operating across borders.
Basis: Inferred · Source: House Amendments to Introduced
Model self-rating: high. Analysis is grounded exclusively in the provided official bill text, fiscal impact statements, revenue impact notices, and staff measure summaries. No external speculation or unverified claims are included. This is the model’s assessment of its own analysis, not independent verification or human review.
This proposal has not become law. The generated effects below describe what it would require if enacted.
If adopted, the amendment would replace the original bill's directive for the Legislative Revenue Officer to study the state financial system with a mandate to create an 11-member Task Force on Taxation of International Income. The task force would investigate changes to Oregon’s tax code regarding international income, submit a report by December 1, 2026, and sunset on December 31, 2027. It would take effect immediately upon passage.
Basis: Stakeholder claim · Sources: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The amendment likely shifts legislative focus from a broad state finance study to a targeted evaluation of international income taxation, reflecting ongoing debate over whether Oregon should adjust its approach to corporate profit-shifting and align with evolving federal tax policies or adopt territorial versus worldwide systems.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
Would have to provide part-time staff support (one Economist and one Committee Assistant) to the task force, with costs absorbed by existing budgets unless cumulative interim work exceeds assumptions.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Potential effect if enacted: 11 appointed individuals serve on a temporary body; non-legislative members act as uncompensated volunteers unless qualified under ORS 292.495, while legislative appointees are restricted to nonvoting advisory roles.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Subject to potential future statutory changes regarding international income taxation based on the task force's findings, with no immediate change to current tax obligations.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Receive a mandatory report by December 1, 2026, which may include legislative recommendations for further action.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Would create a time-limited advisory body with strict appointment rules and voting restrictions, requiring expedited analysis of complex international tax policy before the December 1, 2026 deadline.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Would impose minimal direct fiscal costs, absorbed by existing LRO and Legislative Assembly budgets, though cumulative task force work could strain resources if it exceeds 2025-27 budget assumptions.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Potential effect if enacted: Mandates all state agencies to assist the task force and furnish information, subject to confidentiality laws, potentially increasing administrative coordination demands across executive departments.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Oregon-based businesses & state revenue
The task force would identify a highly efficient territorial taxation model that would significantly reduce compliance costs for multinational corporations headquartered in Oregon while maintaining or increasing state revenue through broader base expansion and elimination of complex tax expenditures.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
State tax base & policy continuity
Potential effect if enacted: The task force's recommendations inadvertently favor specific corporate interests by narrowly defining international income, leading to unintended tax base erosion for other sectors, or appointment delays prevent the task force from meeting its December 1, 2026 deadline, leaving a policy gap during concurrent federal tax changes.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: inference
Sources · Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: The measure trades a broad, standalone LRO study of state finance for a targeted, time-limited task force focused specifically on international income taxation, prioritizing specialized expertise and expedited reporting over comprehensive systemic analysis.
Potential effect if enacted: Focused evaluation of complex international tax rules may yield actionable recommendations to simplify compliance or align Oregon with evolving federal policies.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Staff Measure Summary A
Potential effect if enacted: Clear sunset date (December 31, 2027) prevents indefinite expansion of interim bodies and ensures policy focus remains temporary.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Narrowed scope excludes broader state finance or spending funding studies that the original bill intended to address.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Introduced
Potential effect if enacted: Reliance on appointed members who lack binding authority, combined with potential resource strain from cumulative interim work, may limit the task force's practical impact.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Model self-rating: high. The amendment text, fiscal statements, and staff summaries provide clear, consistent details on structure, mandate, deadlines, and costs. No enacted status or external litigation is assumed. This is the model’s assessment of its own analysis, not independent verification or human review.
This proposal has not become law. The generated effects below describe what it would require if enacted.
The proposed amendment would replace the original measure by creating an 11-member Task Force on Taxation of International Income to investigate potential changes to Oregon’s tax code regarding international income and explore broader statutory adjustments. If adopted, it would require the task force to submit a report with possible legislative recommendations to revenue-related interim committees by December 1, 2026, direct state agencies to assist in gathering information, assign staff support from the Legislative Revenue Office, and sunset entirely on December 31, 2027. The measure would take effect immediately upon passage under an emergency declaration.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
Lawmakers may be seeking a structured, multi-stakeholder review of Oregon’s international tax treatment to assess alignment with recent federal policy shifts and evaluate potential impacts on state competitiveness and compliance burdens.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Staff Measure Summary A; Staff Measure Summary A
Potential effect if enacted: Each group receives a designated nonvoting appointment to the task force, granting direct access to the policy review process without voting power over final recommendations.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Two appointed members provide technical analysis on international income tax policy, influencing the scope and depth of the task force’s investigation.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Would have to assign part-time staff (one economist and one committee assistant) to support the task force, with costs absorbed into existing budgets unless cumulative interim work exceeds 2025-27 allocations.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Potential effect if enacted: Indirectly affected by potential future statutory changes to international income taxation that may emerge from the task force’s December 2026 report, though no immediate tax rate or base changes are mandated.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
The task force would have to convene at times set by the chair or a majority of voting members, adopt operational rules, and compile a report addressing improvements or simplifications to Oregon’s international income tax treatment. All state agencies are legally directed to assist and provide information as permitted by confidentiality laws.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Fiscal impact is classified as minimal. Legislative appointees receive per diem and travel reimbursement; non-legislative volunteers serve without compensation unless they meet specific statutory qualifications for expense reimbursement.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Potential effect if enacted: Appointment authority is concentrated: the Speaker of the House appoints four nonvoting representatives and five gubernatorial appointees (including the chair and vice chair), while the Senate President appoints two nonvoting senators. Voting power rests exclusively with the five gubernatorial appointees.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Compliance relies on voluntary agency cooperation and legislative oversight. The emergency declaration bypasses standard waiting periods, accelerating implementation but limiting deliberative review before operations begin.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Oregon taxpayers and multinational corporations operating in Oregon
The task force successfully would develop a streamlined territorial taxation framework that aligns Oregon with federal standards, attracting multinational corporate headquarters and generating sustained revenue growth without raising statutory rates.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Oregon taxpayers and multinational corporations operating in Oregon
Potential effect if enacted: Partisan or stakeholder deadlock on the task force delays critical revenue analysis, leaving Oregon’s international tax provisions misaligned with updated federal rules and creating compliance liabilities for businesses navigating cross-border transactions.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: The distinction between lawful appointment discretion and potential misuse hinges on whether appointed members adhere to existing ethics statutes or exploit the volunteer status to bypass standard compensation reporting thresholds.
Sources · Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: The measure trades immediate, targeted expert analysis of complex international tax rules for the risk of stakeholder capture and delayed revenue decisions. Upsides include a structured review tailored to recent federal shifts and potential compliance simplification; downsides include concentrated appointment power, minimal transparency safeguards for appointed members, and temporary policy uncertainty for businesses awaiting legislative clarity.
Expert-driven analysis aligned with recent federal tax modifications (NCTI/FDDEI) could simplify compliance for Oregon-based multinational entities.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Staff Measure Summary A
Potential effect if enacted: Multi-stakeholder composition ensures labor, business, and technical perspectives are formally integrated into policy evaluation.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Concentration of appointment authority in the Speaker and Governor may limit bipartisan or independent input.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Emergency enactment accelerates implementation but would reduce time for public comment, fiscal stress-testing, and intercommittee coordination.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Model self-rating: high. Analysis is grounded in the explicit statutory text, official fiscal statements, and staff summaries provided. No enacted provisions or external litigation are assumed. This is the model’s assessment of its own analysis, not independent verification or human review.
37 records currently loaded
Records available in the current snapshot.
Earliest loaded signal
Introduced bill text posted
Posted Jan 28, 2026, 3:25 PM PST
AI-assessed adopted replacement
The adopted -2 amendment deletes the generic financial-system study and substitutes a distinct international-income tax task force. The research topic and institution are wholly changed.
AI assessment dated 2026-09-29. This classification is separate from enactment and legal effect.
Evidence snapshot: 2026-09-29. Later legislative records are not automatically reassessed.
Policy purpose: substantially changed.
Reviewer: /root/review_recent_a · 2026-09-29
AI-assessed adopted replacement
The adopted -2 amendment deletes the generic financial-system study and substitutes a distinct international-income tax task force. The research topic and institution are wholly changed.
Policy purpose: substantially changed.
“SECTION 1. The Legislative Revenue Officer shall study the state financial system. The 5 Legislative Revenue Officer shall submit a report in the manner provided by ORS 192.245, and 6 may include recommendations for”
Introduced
“SECTION 1. (1) The Task Force on Taxation of International Income is established. 5 (2) The task force consists of 11 members appointed as follows: 6 (a) The Speaker of the House of Representatives shall appoint f”
A-Engrossed
Reviewer: /root/review_recent_b · 2026-09-29
AI-assessed adopted replacement
The adopted -2 amendment replaces the entire broad finance study with a new task-force body and focused international-income taxation agenda.
Policy purpose: substantially changed.
“SECTION 1. The Legislative Revenue Officer shall study the state financial system. The 5 Legislative Revenue Officer shall submit a report in the manner provided by ORS 192.245, and 6 may include recommendations for legislation, to the inte”
Introduced
“SECTION 1. (1) The Task Force on Taxation of International Income is established. 5 (2) The task force consists of 11 members appointed as follows: 6 (a) The Speaker of the House of Representatives shall appoint four nonvoting members 7 from among members of the House of Representatives, with not”
A-Engrossed
“Gut and stuff” research tracks substantial replacements of a bill’s substantive text. Policy change is assessed separately: a rewrite can retain the same purpose. A proposed amendment is counted as adopted only when the official evidence supports adoption.
Two subscription subagents independently examine the same official evidence without seeing each other’s answers. An additional subagent can adjudicate disagreements against the sources. Unsupported conclusions, missing evidence, and unresolved disagreements remain uncertain. Agreement is not a guarantee of accuracy.
Session totals count each HB or SB once, including bills that did not become law. Resolutions and memorials are excluded. Counts describe the research inventory, independent of your search, interests, following, and status filters. Missing or unassessed bills are not negative findings.
The replacement watch is a rule, not an AI assessment: a bill whose introduced text is a short study bill (a study word, at most three sections, under 400 words) or a blank form (a run of blanks, 300 words or fewer) is listed once a proposed amendment is posted for it. In the 2021 to 2026 training sessions, 271 of 374 such bills were later replaced; the rate is historical and says nothing about a particular bill’s intent.
Assessments are published research snapshots. Opening this page reads saved research and does not run an AI review. Refreshes require another evidence export, independent assessment, and validated import; reports do not continuously refresh. Each bill’s evidence and reviewer provenance are available on its detail page.
Follow the official text for HB 4014 and every amendment branch. Connections come from each amendment's stated base. Horizontal position shows when each document was first posted, when available. Dotted links flag likely related proposals based on their text.
Click a card to isolate its connected lines; use View summary to jump to its details. Horizontal position shows first posting time in Pacific Time. Drag or use the arrow keys to pan. Pinch with two fingers on mobile, or zoom with the controls, +/− keys, or Control/Command + scroll; press 0 to reset. Dashed branches remained proposals. Dotted teal links are text-based early signals, not official amendment relationships.
Selected document summary
Substantial replacement
What the document says to change
Delete lines 4 through 8 and insert:
Inferred policy relationships
Likely revised proposal · Amendment -2
High confidence from shared inserted text: ORS 174.111, ORS 192.245, ORS 292.495, Effective date.
This is a text-based early signal, not an official statement that one amendment changes the other.
Official records (1)
Oregon records no individual sponsors.
Presession filing record
Introduced and printed pursuant to House Rule 12.00. Presession filed.
LC 195 became HB 4014
Mapping document posted: January 2, 2026 at 2:30 PM PST
Work Session — 4:15 - 4:30 Introduction of Committee Bills LC 186 Tax Compliance LC 190 Update Federal Connection LC 195 Study on the State's Financial System
House Interim Committee on Revenue introduction work session
Committee meeting: January 13, 2026 at 2:30 PM PST
HR A
Committee introduction motion
Committee meeting: January 13, 2026 at 2:30 PM PST
Vice-Chair Walters moved to adopt the listed legislative concepts as committee bills. Motion Passed
Committee introduction allows consideration; it does not imply every member supported the introduced or final text.
House carrier
Representative Zach Hudson
Third Reading Of House Bills · Version A
A carrier presents the measure or report but is not necessarily its sponsor or author.
Records already listed in Activity are not repeated here.
37 events
Full timeline
37 entries shown.
At Desk upon adjournment.
Second reading.
Recommendation: Do pass the A-Eng. bill.
Staff Measure Summary · Version A
Referred to Ways and Means.
First reading. Referred to President's desk.
Passed.
Ayes, 32; Nays, 26--Boice, Boshart Davis, Breese-Iverson, Bunch, Cate, Diehl, Edwards, Elmer, Harbick, Helfrich, Isadore, Levy B, Lewis, Mannix, McIntire, Osborne, Owens, Reschke, Scharf, Skarlatos, Smith G, Tran, Wallan, Watanabe, Wright, Yunker; Excused, 2--Hartman, Valderrama.
Motion to re-refer to Revenue failed.
Ayes, 23; Nays, 35--Andersen, Bowman, Chaichi, Chotzen, Dobson, Evans, Fragala, Gamba, Gomberg, Grayber, Helm, Hudson, Isadore, Javadi, Kropf, Levy E, Lively, Marsh, McDonald, McLain, Munoz, Nathanson, Nelson, Nguyen D, Nosse, Pham H, Rieke Smith, Ruiz, Sanchez, Sosa, Tran, Walters, Watanabe, Wise, Speaker Fahey; Excused, 2--Hartman, Valderrama.
Third reading. Carried by Hudson.
Second reading.
Recommendation: Do pass.
Staff Measure Summary · Version A
Work Session held.
Work Session
Heard and Reported Out · Agenda item 3 · Room HR 40 · Relating to state finance (Representative Gomberg, carrier)
Returned to Full Committee.
Work Session held.
Work Session
Heard and Reported Out · Agenda item 2 · Room HR G · Relating to state finance
House Amendments to Introduced bill text posted
Assigned to Subcommittee On General Government.
Referred to Ways and Means by order of Speaker.
Recommendation: Do pass with amendments, be printed A-Engrossed, and be referred to Ways and Means.
Work Session held.
Work Session
Heard and Reported Out with Amendments · Agenda item 1 · Room HR A · Requires the Legislative Revenue Officer to study the state financial system.
IS_Impact HB 4014 2
Revenue Impact Statement
Amendment -2 adopted
Public Hearing held.
Public Hearing
Heard · Agenda item 3 · Room HR A · Requires the Legislative Revenue Officer to study the state financial system.
Amendment -1 proposed
Public Hearing held.
Public Hearing
Heard · Agenda item 4 · Room HR A · Requires the Legislative Revenue Officer to study the state financial system.
Referred to Revenue.
First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
Source title: Requires the Legislative Revenue Officer to study the state financial systemThis source title may describe an earlier version. Read the current brief and version history above.
“Staff Measure Summary · Version A”
Confirm with the official record.
Supplemental, source-linked analysis from project researchers and community contributors. It is separate from Oregon's official record.