Loading policy item
Describe the problem, review exactly what will be sent, then choose whether to submit. Your interest description, account details, search text, and browsing history are excluded by default. Do not add private information unless you want it included.
Describe the problem, review exactly what will be sent, then choose whether to submit. Your interest description, account details, search text, and browsing history are excluded by default. Do not add private information unless you want it included.
SB 5703
Reallocates approximately $42.5 million in projected lottery revenue and adjusts allocations from the Criminal Fine Account and Oregon Marijuana Account for the 2025-27 biennium to align with revised March 2026 revenue forecasts, while backfilling reduced criminal justice and victim service programs with General Fund dollars.
Generated explanation · Enrolled · Analyzed 8/21/2026 · Open official Enrolled text
Affected groups have not been established in a brief for the latest available text. Check the official text for eligibility and exceptions.
No upcoming event is verified in the available records.
Enactment and effective dates are separate. Effective dates have not been verified here; provisions may take effect at different times. Check the official text.
Plain-language analysis
Generated analysis, not an official summary or legal advice. Confirm with linked Oregon documents.
This measure became law. Enactment does not establish that every provision is already effective; check each effective date in the official text.
Reallocates approximately $42.5 million in projected lottery revenue and adjusts allocations from the Criminal Fine Account and Oregon Marijuana Account for the 2025-27 biennium to align with revised March 2026 revenue forecasts, while backfilling reduced criminal justice and victim service programs with General Fund dollars.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Budget Report A; Budget Report A
The measure adjusts biennial allocations to match the March 2026 state economic and revenue forecast, which projects lower lottery, criminal fine, and marijuana tax revenues compared to the May 2025 forecast used for the original budget.
Basis: Official analysis · Sources: Budget Report A; Budget Report A
The text supports no bounded hypothesis.
Receives slight net increases in operations, trade, infrastructure, and program expenses.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
Receives a $22.3 million reduction from lottery proceeds, partially offset by a rebalanced distribution from the Fund for Student Success that leaves the Statewide Education Initiatives Account reduced by $18.1 million while keeping Student Investment and Early Learning accounts unchanged.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Enrolled; Budget Report A
Loses dedicated Criminal Fine Account allocations, which are replaced by General Fund backfills.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Enrolled; Budget Report A
Receives increased funding for operations, appeals, strategic partnerships, aging services, and suicide prevention grants.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Enrolled; Budget Report A
Sees a $15.5 million reduction in marijuana tax allocations.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Enrolled; Budget Report A
Agencies must manage quarterly cash flows based on updated DAS-OEA forecasts, with lottery bond debt service taking statutory priority over other allocations. If quarterly lottery transfers fall short, the Department of Administrative Services will automatically reduce non-debt-service allocations proportionately. DHS and Judicial Department programs relying on Criminal Fine Account revenues will transition to General Fund backfills, altering their revenue stability and reporting requirements.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Enrolled; Budget Report A
State Agencies and Grant Recipients
If lottery revenues exceed forecasts by Q4, the $25 million projected ending balance could expand significantly, allowing agencies to fund unbudgeted initiatives or increase grant awards without new legislative action.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Budget Report A
Education, Economic Development, and Veterans' Programs
If lottery revenues drop sharply in a subsequent quarter, the proportional reduction mechanism would automatically slash funding for education, economic development, and veterans' programs mid-biennium, potentially halting active grant disbursements or delaying service contracts.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
The text legally permits proportional reductions; abuse arises from weak enforcement of cash flow tracking and misclassification of temporary shortfalls as permanent funding losses.
Sources · Enrolled
The measure prioritizes fiscal stability and constitutional bond debt service by reducing discretionary program allocations in response to lower revenue forecasts, which preserves mandatory dedications but forces mid-biennium cuts to specific education, victim services, and treatment programs that must be backfilled or absorbed through General Fund transfers.
Maintains constitutional lottery dedications and bond obligations without triggering default or emergency borrowing.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Budget Report A
Provides targeted increases to veterans' services, economic development operations, and criminal justice training aligned with current fiscal capacity.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
Eliminates dedicated Criminal Fine Account funding for domestic violence and sexual assault victim services, shifting financial risk to the General Fund.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
Reduces marijuana tax allocations for drug treatment and recovery services, potentially constraining capacity in a sector with high demand.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
The enrolled text is substantively identical to the Senate Amendments version, with no changes to allocation amounts, fund sources, or statutory mechanisms. Differences are limited to procedural formatting and final enactment signatures.
No substantive change identified.
Tradeoff: None.
Model self-rating: high. Based on enrolled bill text and official legislative fiscal analysis. This is the model’s assessment of its own analysis, not independent verification or human review.
Possible effects if adopted; not current bill text.
This proposal has not become law. The generated effects below describe what it would require if enacted.
Potential effect if enacted: The measure reallocates approximately $42.5 million across state funds for the 2025-27 biennium to match revised March 2026 revenue forecasts, primarily by reducing allocations to the Drug Treatment and Recovery Services Fund ($15.5 million), eliminating dedicated Criminal Fine Account funding for domestic violence/sexual assault victim services and court security ($10.4 million combined), and shifting education funding from the Statewide Education Initiatives Account ($18.1 million). It preserves mandatory lottery bond debt service, core agency operations, and veteran program funding while leaving a $25 million projected ending balance in the Economic Development Fund.
Basis: Bill text · Sources: Senate Amendments to Introduced; Budget Report A; Budget Report A
The measure adjusts biennial allocations from the Economic Development Fund, Veterans’ Services Fund, Criminal Fine Account, Oregon Marijuana Account, and Fund for Student Success to align with a March 2026 revenue forecast that shows lottery resources are $57.5 million lower, criminal fine revenues declined 9.3 percent, and marijuana tax revenues decreased 5.2 percent compared to the May 2025 forecast used for the original budget.
Basis: Official analysis · Sources: Budget Report A; Budget Report A
The text supports no bounded hypothesis.
Potential effect if enacted: Lose dedicated Criminal Fine Account allocations totaling $3.5 million, shifting reliance to General Fund backfills or alternative revenue streams.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Potential effect if enacted: Receive zero dedicated funding for security and emergency preparedness ($6.9 million reduction), potentially straining facility safety operations and infrastructure maintenance.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Potential effect if enacted: Face a $15.5 million reduction in the Drug Treatment and Recovery Services Fund, likely requiring service scaling or grant reductions across the state.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Potential effect if enacted: Receive increased allocations ($621,604 combined) to cover pension obligation bond adjustments, compensation plan changes, and new suicide prevention grant programs.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Potential effect if enacted: Experience an $18.1 million reallocation from the Statewide Education Initiatives Account to reserves and other education accounts due to corporate activity tax revenue forecasts.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
State agencies would have to adjust quarterly cash flow planning and program delivery timelines to match revised allocation amounts. Victim service providers and court security operations face immediate funding gaps that require legislative backfill or administrative reallocation before services could continue at prior levels. Drug treatment programs would have to evaluate capacity against reduced fund deposits, while education grant administrators would see altered rollout schedules for Statewide Initiatives projects. The measure also triggers automatic proportionate reductions in quarterly allocations if lottery transfers fall short of biennial targets, requiring continuous revenue monitoring by the Department of Administrative Services.
Basis: Bill text · Sources: Senate Amendments to Introduced; Budget Report A
State fiscal management
Potential effect if enacted: A mid-biennium surge in sports betting revenue triggers the proportionate reduction clause, allowing the state to preserve the $25 million ending balance and avoid a fiscal cliff for FY2027 while maintaining all constitutional dedications and debt service obligations.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Victim services and judicial infrastructure
Criminal fine collections drop an additional 15 percent due to economic contraction; with DHS and Judicial allocations set to zero, domestic violence shelters and county courts face immediate service suspensions or facility closures before General Fund backfills could be processed and appropriated.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
The statutory mechanism would allow flexible reallocation, but administrative delay in triggering proportionate reductions could effectively bypass legislative intent to maintain transparent, timely funding adjustments.
Sources · Senate Amendments to Introduced
Potential effect if enacted: The measure trades dedicated funding for victim services, court security, and drug treatment programs to protect mandatory debt service obligations and core agency operations amid declining revenue forecasts. Upsides include stabilized bond payments, preserved staffing costs, and maintained veteran program support; downsides include immediate service gaps for vulnerable populations, reduced judicial infrastructure backing, and scaled-back addiction treatment capacity.
Potential effect if enacted: Stabilized lottery bond debt service prevents default risk and preserves state credit ratings.
Basis: Official analysis · Source: Budget Report A
Potential effect if enacted: Preserved pension obligation bond adjustments and compensation plan changes protect agency workforce retention.
Basis: Official analysis · Source: Budget Report A
Elimination of dedicated Criminal Fine Account funding for domestic violence and sexual assault victim services would create immediate service delivery gaps.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Reduction of the Drug Treatment and Recovery Services Fund by $15.5 million likely forces programmatic scaling that would reduce treatment access for individuals with substance use disorders.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Senate Amendments to Introduced
Model self-rating: high. The measure is a direct budget reconciliation bill with explicit allocation changes and official fiscal analysis confirming revenue forecast adjustments. No speculative litigation or sponsor motive claims are required to establish the text's operative effects. This is the model’s assessment of its own analysis, not independent verification or human review.
This proposal has not become law. The generated effects below describe what it would require if enacted.
The amendment would reduce biennial appropriations across five state funds by approximately $42.5 million net, reallocating resources to prioritize lottery bond debt service, economic development operations, and veterans' programs while eliminating dedicated allocations for domestic violence and sexual assault victim services, state and county court security, and the Drug Treatment and Recovery Services Fund. Material consequence: Affected agencies would have to absorb funding gaps through General Fund backfills, operational reductions, or shifted local costs, with cash-flow shortfalls triggering automatic pro-rata cuts to remaining allocations.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Budget Report A
The measure adjusts allocations to align with a March 2026 revenue forecast showing significant declines in lottery proceeds, criminal fine revenues, and marijuana tax receipts compared to prior projections.
Basis: Official analysis · Source: Budget Report A
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The legislature appears to be prioritizing fixed debt obligations and core agency administrative costs over discretionary victim services and court security programs, likely reflecting a strategic choice to preserve state creditworthiness and essential operations amid projected revenue contraction.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Receives increased funding for operations, business/innovation/trade programs, and infrastructure administration to cover pension adjustments and new tax credit/grant program costs.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Receives a $22.3 million reduction in dedicated Economic Development Fund allocations, requiring rebalancing within the Fund for Student Success.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Dedicated Criminal Fine Account allocations are reduced to $0, eliminating statutory funding streams for victim services unless backfilled.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Receives increased funding for operations, appeals, strategic partnerships, aging services, and suicide prevention grants.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Receives a $2.1 million increase to cover pension obligation bond and employee compensation plan changes.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Receives a $15.6 million reduction in marijuana tax allocations, directly impacting early intervention and treatment service capacity.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Dedicated security and emergency preparedness allocations are reduced to $0, shifting financial responsibility for facility security.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Agencies would have to revise biennial budgets to accommodate reduced dedicated revenues, potentially delaying grant disbursements or contracting service providers.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: DHS programs may face immediate suspension of victim services unless General Fund backfills are enacted, altering eligibility and access for affected populations.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Court security operations would likely shift financial responsibility to county governments, creating local budget obligations.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
The statutory pro-rata reduction mechanism would create ongoing cash-flow risk if quarterly lottery transfers fall short, requiring DAS to continuously adjust allocation schedules.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
State Treasury & Economic Development Programs
If lottery revenues unexpectedly surge, the preserved debt service priority and increased economic development funding could accelerate infrastructure projects and stabilize pension obligations without new legislative action.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Drug Treatment & Recovery Services Fund Recipients
If marijuana tax revenues continue declining, the $15.6 million reduction could force closure of regional treatment centers, leaving vulnerable populations without early intervention services during a public health crisis.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
The distinction relies on whether DAS would apply the pro-rata formula uniformly and accurately categorizes expenditures per statutory definitions rather than exploiting discretionary reporting flexibility.
Sources · Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: The measure trades reduced discretionary funding for victim services, court security, and drug treatment to prioritize debt service obligations, economic development operations, and veterans' programs amid forecasted revenue declines. Upsides stabilize bond payments and support core agency costs; downsides eliminate dedicated funding for domestic violence/sexual assault victims and court security, potentially shifting financial burdens to local governments or requiring General Fund backfills.
Potential effect if enacted: Stabilizes lottery bond debt service and pension obligations, reducing default risk.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Preserves core administrative capacity for economic development and veterans' programs during revenue contraction.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Would eliminate dedicated funding for domestic violence and sexual assault victim services, potentially leaving survivors without statutory support.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Would remove court security allocations, forcing local governments to absorb costs or reduce facility safety measures.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Model self-rating: high. Analysis is grounded in the explicit amendment text and official budget report detailing forecasted revenue declines and allocation shifts. No legislative intent or external events are assumed. This is the model’s assessment of its own analysis, not independent verification or human review.
This proposal has not become law. The generated effects below describe what it would require if enacted.
If adopted, this amendment would reallocate approximately $42.5 million in reduced lottery revenue, adjust allocations across the Criminal Fine Account, Oregon Marijuana Account, and Fund for Student Success, and establish a new Veterans’ Suicide Prevention grant program for the 2025-27 biennium. Potential effects could include an $18.2 million reduction to statewide education initiatives, elimination of Criminal Fine Account funding for domestic violence and sexual assault victim programs, increased support for business development and veteran services, and mandatory General Fund backfills totaling $9.6 million to cover judicial and justice department shortfalls.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Budget Report A
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The amendment appears designed to reconcile biennial appropriations with a March 2026 revenue forecast that projected lower lottery, criminal fine, and marijuana tax receipts than previously estimated, while simultaneously directing new funding toward veteran suicide prevention and business development programs.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Budget Report A
Would have to operate under revised quarterly disbursement caps, adjust program scopes to match new expenditure limitations, and manage backfilled or reduced direct allocations.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Face reduced state funding allocations, requiring immediate grantee reallocation, service reductions, or reliance on existing fund balances.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Veteran programs receive targeted increases including a new suicide prevention grant; gambling treatment funding sees a minor reduction.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Lose dedicated Criminal Fine Account funding, necessitating reliance on General Fund backfills or alternative revenue streams to maintain statutory services.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Agencies would have to adjust quarterly disbursement schedules and program scopes to match revised expenditure caps.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Education grantees face reduced state support requiring immediate reallocation or service reductions.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Victim service programs lose dedicated Criminal Fine Account funding, necessitating reliance on General Fund backfills or alternative revenue streams.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
The new veteran suicide prevention grant would require rapid rulemaking and outreach infrastructure.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Veterans' services recipients and regional economic development stakeholders
Potential effect if enacted: The redirected business development and veteran suicide prevention funding catalyzes a measurable decline in regional unemployment and veteran suicide rates within two years.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Domestic violence and sexual assault victims
Potential effect if enacted: The zero allocation to domestic violence and sexual assault victim funds from the Criminal Fine Account, combined with delayed General Fund backfills, forces immediate suspension of state-mandated victim advocacy and legal aid services across multiple counties.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Administrative delay or misclassification of backfilled revenues could functionally defund statutory programs while maintaining the appearance of compliance with allocation caps.
Sources · Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: The measure trades reduced funding for statewide education initiatives and dedicated victim service accounts to maintain fiscal solvency and finance targeted veteran and business development programs. Upsides align spending with current revenue forecasts, prevent broader budget shortfalls, and establish new preventive health and economic support mechanisms. Downsides create immediate funding gaps for education and victim services, increase reliance on General Fund backfills, and concentrate discretionary allocation power within the executive branch during a revenue downturn.
Potential effect if enacted: Aligns spending with current revenue forecasts, preventing broader budget shortfalls.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Budget Report A
Would establish new preventive health and economic support mechanisms for veterans and business development.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Would create immediate funding gaps for education and victim services.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential effect if enacted: Increases reliance on General Fund backfills and concentrates discretionary allocation power within the executive branch during a revenue downturn.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Budget Report A
Model self-rating: high. Analysis is grounded in the explicit allocation tables and fiscal context provided in the proposed amendment and official budget report. No speculation beyond forecast-driven rebalancing is presented as fact. This is the model’s assessment of its own analysis, not independent verification or human review.
28 records currently loaded
Records available in the current snapshot.
Earliest loaded signal
Introduced bill text posted
Posted Feb 6, 2026, 5:00 PM PST
Uncertain
Independent AI assessments disagree; no supported adjudication is available.
AI assessment dated 2026-09-29. This classification is separate from enactment and legal effect.
Evidence snapshot: 2026-09-29. Later legislative records are not automatically reassessed.
Policy purpose: uncertain.
Reviewer: /root/review_recent_a · 2026-09-29
Uncertain
The introduced text has no specified substantive spending policy to compare. The adopted version fills the shell with operative allocations, but a before/after policy-change finding is unsupported.
Policy purpose: uncertain.
“SECTION 1. There is appropriated to ______, for the biennium ending June 30, 2027, out 5 of the General Fund, the amount of $______ for ______. 6 SECTION 2. Notwithstanding any other law limiting expenditures, the amount of $______ 7 is established for the biennium ending June 30, 2027, as the maximum limit for payment of 8 ”
Introduced
“SECTION 1. Section 3, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 3. The following amounts are allocated for the biennium beginning July 1, 2025, from the Administrative Services Economic Development Fund, to the Oregon Business Development De- partment, for the following purposes: [(1) Operations .................”
Enrolled
Reviewer: /root/review_recent_b · 2026-09-29
Not a qualifying replacement
Filling a budget shell with allocations does not show substitution of an earlier substantive policy; the introduced text supplied no agency or amount to replace.
Policy purpose: broadly retained.
“SECTION 1. There is appropriated to ______, for the biennium ending June 30, 2027, out 5 of the General Fund, the amount of $______ for ______. 6 SECTION 2. Notwithstanding any other law limiting expenditures, the amou”
Introduced
“SECTION 1. Section 3, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 3. The following amounts are allocated for the biennium beginning July 1, 2025, from the Administrative Services Economic Development Fund, t”
Enrolled
“Gut and stuff” research tracks substantial replacements of a bill’s substantive text. Policy change is assessed separately: a rewrite can retain the same purpose. A proposed amendment is counted as adopted only when the official evidence supports adoption.
Two subscription subagents independently examine the same official evidence without seeing each other’s answers. An additional subagent can adjudicate disagreements against the sources. Unsupported conclusions, missing evidence, and unresolved disagreements remain uncertain. Agreement is not a guarantee of accuracy.
Session totals count each HB or SB once, including bills that did not become law. Resolutions and memorials are excluded. Counts describe the research inventory, independent of your search, interests, following, and status filters. Missing or unassessed bills are not negative findings.
The replacement watch is a rule, not an AI assessment: a bill whose introduced text is a short study bill (a study word, at most three sections, under 400 words) or a blank form (a run of blanks, 300 words or fewer) is listed once a proposed amendment is posted for it. In the 2021 to 2026 training sessions, 271 of 374 such bills were later replaced; the rate is historical and says nothing about a particular bill’s intent.
Assessments are published research snapshots. Opening this page reads saved research and does not run an AI review. Refreshes require another evidence export, independent assessment, and validated import; reports do not continuously refresh. Each bill’s evidence and reviewer provenance are available on its detail page.
Follow the official text for SB 5703 and every amendment branch. Connections come from each amendment's stated base. Horizontal position shows when each document was first posted, when available.
Click a card to isolate its connected lines; use View summary to jump to its details. Horizontal position shows first posting time in Pacific Time. Drag or use the arrow keys to pan. Pinch with two fingers on mobile, or zoom with the controls, +/− keys, or Control/Command + scroll; press 0 to reset. Dashed branches remained proposals.
Selected document summary
Substantial replacement
What the document says to change
Delete lines 4 through 15 and insert:
LC 323 draft
Date printed on LC draft: January 20, 2026
LC 323 became SB 5703
Mapping document posted: February 5, 2026 at 6:01 AM PST
LC 323
Joint Committee on Ways and Means introduction work session
Committee meeting: February 6, 2026 at 8:30 AM PST
HR 40
Committee introduction allows consideration; it does not imply every member supported the introduced or final text.
The text changed substantially while keeping measure number SB 5703.
Regular sponsors: Joint Committee on Ways and Means
Senate carrier
Senator Kate Lieber
Third Reading Of Senate Measures · Version A
House carrier
Representative Tawna Sanchez
Third Reading Of Senate Bills · Version A
A carrier presents the measure or report but is not necessarily its sponsor or author.
Records already listed in Activity are not repeated here.
Official origin records are incomplete; missing facts are not inferred.
28 events
Full timeline
28 entries shown.
Effective date, April 7, 2026.
Chapter 138, 2026 Laws.
Governor signed.
Speaker signed.
President signed.
Third reading. Carried by Sanchez. Passed.
Ayes, 45; Nays, 9--Boice, Boshart Davis, Diehl, Harbick, Osborne, Scharf, Skarlatos, Wallan, Yunker; Excused, 6--Hartman, Javadi, Levy B, Owens, Ruiz, Valderrama.
Rules suspended. Second reading.
Recommendation: Do pass.
Referred to Ways and Means.
First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
Rules suspended. Third reading. Carried by Lieber. Passed.
Ayes, 25; Nays, 4--Drazan, Linthicum, Robinson, Thatcher; Excused, 1--Neron Misslin.
Second reading.
Senate Amendments to Introduced bill text posted
Recommendation: Do pass with amendments. (Printed A-Eng.)
Work Session held.
Amendment -1 adopted
Returned to Full Committee.
Public Hearing and Work Session held.
Amendment -1 proposed
Assigned to Subcommittee On Capital Construction.
Referred to Ways and Means.
Introduction and first reading. Referred to President's desk.
expenses to administer the new program. Lottery Funds will be allocated through Senate Bill 5703 to ODVA for legislatively approved Lottery Funds expenditures. Summary of Tran
expenses to administer the new program. Lottery Funds will be allocated through Senate Bill 5703 to ODVA for legislatively approved Lottery Funds expenditures. Summary of Tran
transferred to the newly established Drug Treatment and Recovery Services Fund. HB 4056 (2022) further amended the distributions by requiring the $11.25 million quarte
transferred to the newly established Drug Treatment and Recovery Services Fund. HB 4056 (2022) further amended the distributions by requiring the $11.25 million quarte
507; $235,846 for administration of a micro-tariff adjustment grant program in HB 4061; and $350,000 for program evaluation requirements in HB 4062 o Business, Innov
507; $235,846 for administration of a micro-tariff adjustment grant program in HB 4061; and $350,000 for program evaluation requirements in HB 4062 o Business, Innov
edit program in SB 1507; $950,000 for micro-tariff adjustment grant funding in HB 4061 o Infrastructure - $156,866 for pension obligation bond and employee compensat
edit program in SB 1507; $950,000 for micro-tariff adjustment grant funding in HB 4061 o Infrastructure - $156,866 for pension obligation bond and employee compensat
grant program in HB 4061; and $350,000 for program evaluation requirements in HB 4062 o Business, Innovation, and Trade - $347,751 for pension obligation bond and e
grant program in HB 4061; and $350,000 for program evaluation requirements in HB 4062 o Business, Innovation, and Trade - $347,751 for pension obligation bond and e
53,115 for the establishment of a Veterans’ Suicide Prevention grant program in HB 4132. Finally, there is a $6,898 allocation increase to the Bureau of Labor and Ind
53,115 for the establishment of a Veterans’ Suicide Prevention grant program in HB 4132. Finally, there is a $6,898 allocation increase to the Bureau of Labor and Ind
ts, as adjusted in the omnibus budget reconciliation bill for the 2026 session (HB 5204). The March 2026 revenue forecast for 2025-27 lottery resources is $57.5 milli
ts, as adjusted in the omnibus budget reconciliation bill for the 2026 session (HB 5204). The March 2026 revenue forecast for 2025-27 lottery resources is $57.5 milli
et of reductions; $167,011 for the administration of new tax credit program in SB 1507; $235,846 for administration of a micro-tariff adjustment grant program in HB
et of reductions; $167,011 for the administration of new tax credit program in SB 1507; $235,846 for administration of a micro-tariff adjustment grant program in HB
f reductions; $1.1 million for the administration of new tax credit program in SB 1507; $950,000 for micro-tariff adjustment grant funding in HB 4061 o Infrastructu
f reductions; $1.1 million for the administration of new tax credit program in SB 1507; $950,000 for micro-tariff adjustment grant funding in HB 4061 o Infrastructu
“amending sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 15, 2 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25 and 26, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025;”. 3 Delete lines 4 through 15 and insert: 4 “ SECTION 1. Section 3, chapter
on; amending sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 15, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25 and 26, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025; and declaring an emergency. Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Orego
s 3 2025;”. 4 Delete lines 4 through 15 and insert: 5 “SECTION 1. Section 3, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 6 read: 7 “ Sec. 3. The following amounts are allocated for th
s 3 2025;”. 4 Delete lines 4 through 15 and insert: 5 “SECTION 1. Section 3, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 6 read: 7 “ Sec. 3. The following amounts are allocated for th
aws 2025;”. 3 Delete lines 4 through 15 and insert: 4 “ SECTION 1. Section 3, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 5 “ Sec. 3. The following amounts are allocated for the b
y. Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: SECTION 1. Section 3, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 3. The following amounts are allocated for the bienn
........................................ $ 1,541,600 19 “SECTION 2. Section 4, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 20 read: 21 “ Sec. 4. There is allocated for the biennium beginn
........................................ $ 1,541,600 19 “SECTION 2. Section 4, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 20 read: 21 “ Sec. 4. There is allocated for the biennium beginn
........................................ $ 1,541,600 17 “ SECTION 2. Section 4, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 18 “ Sec. 4. There is allocated for the biennium beginning
; amending sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 15, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 3 25 and 26, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025; and declaring an emergency. 4 Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Ore
............................................ $ 1,541,600 SECTION 2. Section 4, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 4. There is allocated for the biennium beginning Jul
4 Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: 5 SECTION 1. Section 3, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 6 Sec. 3. The following amounts are allocated for the bie
Fund, 20 the amount of [$606,501,675] $584,162,579. 21 “ SECTION 3. Section 5, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 22 “ Sec. 5. There is allocated for the biennium beginning
l Fund, the amount of [$606,501,675] 3 $584,162,579. 4 “SECTION 3. Section 5, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 5 read: 6 “ Sec. 5. There is allocated for the biennium beginn
l Fund, the amount of [$606,501,675] 3 $584,162,579. 4 “SECTION 3. Section 5, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 5 read: 6 “ Sec. 5. There is allocated for the biennium beginn
School Fund, the amount of [$606,501,675] $584,162,579. SECTION 3. Section 5, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 5. There is allocated for the biennium beginning Jul
,757 for expenses of the Regional Solutions Program. 25 “ SECTION 4. Section 6, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 26 “ Sec. 6. (1) The Oregon Department of Administrative S
57 for expenses of the Regional 9 Solutions Program. 10 “SECTION 4. Section 6, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 11 read: 12 “ Sec. 6. (1) The Oregon Department of Administrativ
57 for expenses of the Regional 9 Solutions Program. 10 “SECTION 4. Section 6, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 11 read: 12 “ Sec. 6. (1) The Oregon Department of Administrativ
,402,757 for expenses of the Regional Solutions Program. SECTION 4. Section 6, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 6. (1) The Oregon Department of Administrative Servi
uarterly basis to fulfill the biennial 15 allocations made by sections 1 to 13, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025 [of this 16 2025 Act]. The department shall set the quarterly allocations. 17 “
uarterly basis to fulfill the biennial 15 allocations made by sections 1 to 13, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025 [of this 16 2025 Act]. The department shall set the quarterly allocations. 17 “
quar- terly basis to fulfill the biennial allocations made by sections 1 to 13, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025 [of this 2025 Act]. The department shall set the quarterly allocations. (2) If
.......................................... $ 1,541,600 18 SECTION 2. Section 4, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 19 Sec. 4. There is allocated for the biennium beginning J
insufficient to pay for the quarterly allocations made by 32 sections 1 to 13, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, [of this 2025 Act] or any other 2025 Act, prior 33 to making any other allocat
are insufficient to pay for the quarterly allocations made by sections 1 to 13, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, [of this 2025 Act] or any other 2025 Act, prior to making any other allocation
ol Fund, 21 the amount of [$606,501,675] $584,162,579. 22 SECTION 3. Section 5, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 23 Sec. 5. There is allocated for the biennium beginning J
025 Act, prior 33 to making any other allocations pursuant to sections 1 to 13, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025 [of 34 this 2025 Act], the department shall satisfy lottery bond debt service o
r 2025 Act, prior to making any other allocations pursuant to sections 1 to 13, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025 [of Enrolled Senate Bill 5703 (SB 5703-A) Page 1 this 2025 Act], the departme
02,757 for expenses of the Regional Solutions Program. 3 SECTION 4. Section 6, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 4 Sec. 6. (1) The Oregon Department of Administrative Ser
insufficient to pay for the quarterly allocations made by 4 sections 1 to 13, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025 [of this 2025 Act], the department shall reduce the 5 quarterly allocations no
insufficient to pay for the quarterly allocations made by sections 29 1 to 13, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025 [of this 2025 Act], the department 30 shall reduce the quarterly allocations no
insufficient to pay for the quarterly allocations made by sections 29 1 to 13, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025 [of this 2025 Act], the department 30 shall reduce the quarterly allocations no
are insufficient to pay for the quarterly allocations made by sections 1 to 13, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025 [of this 2025 Act], the department shall reduce the quarterly allocations not d
uf- 6 ficient to accommodate the revenue shortfall. 7 “ SECTION 5. Section 7, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 8 “ Sec. 7. There is allocated for the biennium beginning
ounts suf- ficient to accommodate the revenue shortfall. SECTION 5. Section 7, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 7. There is allocated for the biennium beginning Jul
s sufficient to accommodate the revenue 2 shortfall. 3 “SECTION 5. Section 7, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 4 read: 5 “ Sec. 7. There is allocated for the biennium beginn
s sufficient to accommodate the revenue 2 shortfall. 3 “SECTION 5. Section 7, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 4 read: 5 “ Sec. 7. There is allocated for the biennium beginn
insufficient to pay for the quarterly allocations made by 10 sections 1 to 13, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, [of this 2025 Act] or any other 2025 Act, prior 11 to making any other allocat
025 Act, prior 11 to making any other allocations pursuant to sections 1 to 13, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025 [of 12 this 2025 Act], the department shall satisfy lottery bond debt service o
t and premium, if any, on outstanding lottery bonds, as described in section 6, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025 [of this 2025 Act]. SECTION 6. Section 9, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is am
9 premium, if any, on outstanding lottery bonds, as described in section 6, 10 chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025 [of this 2025 Act]. 11 “SECTION 6. Section 9, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is
9 premium, if any, on outstanding lottery bonds, as described in section 6, 10 chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025 [of this 2025 Act]. 11 “SECTION 6. Section 9, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is
chapter 632, Oregon Laws 12 2025 [of this 2025 Act]. 13 “ SECTION 6. Section 9, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 14 “ Sec. 9. Notwithstanding and in lieu of the requiremen
ion 6, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025 [of this 2025 Act]. SECTION 6. Section 9, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 9. Notwithstanding and in lieu of the requirement in
10 chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025 [of this 2025 Act]. 11 “SECTION 6. Section 9, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 12 read: 13 “ Sec. 9. Notwithstanding and in lieu of the require
10 chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025 [of this 2025 Act]. 11 “SECTION 6. Section 9, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 12 read: 13 “ Sec. 9. Notwithstanding and in lieu of the require
m Gambling Treatment Fund is [$18,853,152] $18,721,089. SECTION 7. Section 14, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 14. There are allocated for the biennium beginning J
ing Treatment Fund is 17 [$18,853,152] $18,721,089. 18 “ SECTION 7. Section 14, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 19 “ Sec. 14. There are allocated for the biennium beginni
insufficient to pay for the quarterly allocations made by 17 sections 1 to 13, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025 [of this 2025 Act], the department shall reduce the 18 quarterly allocations no
ling Treatment Fund is 17 [$18,853,152] $18,721,089. 18 “SECTION 7. Section 14, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 19 read: 20 “ Sec. 14. There are allocated for the biennium begi
ling Treatment Fund is 17 [$18,853,152] $18,721,089. 18 “SECTION 7. Section 14, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 19 read: 20 “ Sec. 14. There are allocated for the biennium begi
suf- 19 ficient to accommodate the revenue shortfall. 20 SECTION 5. Section 7, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 21 Sec. 7. There is allocated for the biennium beginning J
] (4) Aging veterans’ services ........... $ 3,673,390 SECTION 8. Section 15, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 15. There is allocated for the biennium beginning Ju
4) Aging veterans’ services ........... $ 3,673,390 30 “ SECTION 8. Section 15, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 31 “ Sec. 15. There is allocated for the biennium beginnin
, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 25 2025 [of this 2025 Act]. 26 SECTION 6. Section 9, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 27 Sec. 9. Notwithstanding and in lieu of the requirement
4) Aging veterans’ services ........... $ 3,673,390 2 “SECTION 8. Section 15, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 3 read: 4 “ Sec. 15. There is allocated for the biennium begin
4) Aging veterans’ services ........... $ 3,673,390 2 “SECTION 8. Section 15, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 3 read: 4 “ Sec. 15. There is allocated for the biennium begin
em- ployment apprenticeship outreach and coordination. SECTION 9. Section 17, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 17. There are allocated for the biennium beginning J
ployment apprenticeship outreach and coordination. 34 “ SECTION 9. Section 17, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 35 “ Sec. 17. There are allocated for the biennium beginni
bling Treatment Fund is 30 [$18,853,152] $18,721,089. 31 SECTION 7. Section 14, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 32 Sec. 14. There are allocated for the biennium beginning
yment apprenticeship out- 7 reach and coordination. 8 “SECTION 9. Section 17, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 9 read: 10 “ Sec. 17. There are allocated for the biennium begi
yment apprenticeship out- 7 reach and coordination. 8 “SECTION 9. Section 17, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 9 read: 10 “ Sec. 17. There are allocated for the biennium begi
4] (2) Veterans’ dental program ......... $ 3,518,331 SECTION 10. Section 20, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 20. There is allocated to the Department of Public S
(2) Veterans’ dental program ......... $ 3,518,331 41 “ SECTION 10. Section 20, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 42 “ Sec. 20. There is allocated to the Department of Publ
(2) Veterans’ dental program ......... $ 3,518,331 17 “SECTION 10. Section 20, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 18 read: 19 “ Sec. 20. There is allocated to the Department of P
(2) Veterans’ dental program ......... $ 3,518,331 17 “SECTION 10. Section 20, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 18 read: 19 “ Sec. 20. There is allocated to the Department of P
of criminal justice training and standards operations. SECTION 11. Section 21, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 21. There are allocated to the Department of Justice
riminal justice training and standards operations. 45 “ SECTION 11. Section 21, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: SA to SB 5703 Page 2 1 “ Sec. 21. There are allocated t
(4) Aging veterans’ services ........... $ 3,673,390 43 SECTION 8. Section 15, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 44 Sec. 15. There is allocated for the biennium beginning
minal 22 justice training and standards operations. 23 “SECTION 11. Section 21, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 24 read: 25 “ Sec. 21. There are allocated to the Department of
minal 22 justice training and standards operations. 23 “SECTION 11. Section 21, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 24 read: 25 “ Sec. 21. There are allocated to the Department of
1 ployment apprenticeship outreach and coordination. 2 SECTION 9. Section 17, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 3 Sec. 17. There are allocated for the biennium beginning
ervices..................................... $ 811,868 SECTION 12. Section 22, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 22. There are allocated to the Department of Human S
8 (2) Veterans’ dental program ......... $ 3,518,331 9 SECTION 10. Section 20, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 10 Sec. 20. There is allocated to the Department of Public
ces..................................... $ 811,868 18 “ SECTION 12. Section 22, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 19 “ Sec. 22. There are allocated to the Department of Hum
ces..................................... $ 811,868 13 “SECTION 12. Section 22, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 14 read: 15 “ Sec. 22. There are allocated to the Department of
ces..................................... $ 811,868 13 “SECTION 12. Section 22, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 14 read: 15 “ Sec. 22. There are allocated to the Department of
criminal justice training and standards operations. 13 SECTION 11. Section 21, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 14 Sec. 21. There are allocated to the Department of Justi
.. $ 630,635] (2) Sexual Assault Victims Fund.... $ 0 SECTION 13. Section 23, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 23. There are allocated to the State Court Facilitie
30,635] 27 (2) Sexual Assault Victims Fund.... $ 0 28 “ SECTION 13. Section 23, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 29 “ Sec. 23. There are allocated to the State Court Facil
0,635] 24 (2) Sexual Assault Victims Fund.... $ 0 25 “SECTION 13. Section 23, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 26 read: 27 “ Sec. 23. There are allocated to the State Court Fa
0,635] 24 (2) Sexual Assault Victims Fund.... $ 0 25 “SECTION 13. Section 23, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 26 read: 27 “ Sec. 23. There are allocated to the State Court Fa
$ 1,852,863] facilities security accounts ....... $ 0 SECTION 14. Section 25, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 25. (1) There is allocated to the State School Fund
2,863] 37 facilities security accounts ....... $ 0 38 “ SECTION 14. Section 25, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 39 “ Sec. 25. (1) There is allocated to the State School F
vices..................................... $ 811,868 31 SECTION 12. Section 22, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 32 Sec. 22. There are allocated to the Department of Human
,863] 6 facilities security accounts ....... $ 0 7 “SECTION 14. Section 25, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 8 read: 9 “ Sec. 25. (1) There is allocated to the State Schoo
,863] 6 facilities security accounts ....... $ 0 7 “SECTION 14. Section 25, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 8 read: 9 “ Sec. 25. (1) There is allocated to the State Schoo
630,635] 40 (2) Sexual Assault Victims Fund.... $ 0 41 SECTION 13. Section 23, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 42 Sec. 23. There are allocated to the State Court Facilit
uana Account, the amount of [$16,338,103] $16,338,216. SECTION 15. Section 26, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Enrolled Senate Bill 5703 (SB 5703-A) Page 3 Sec. 26. N
852,863] 5 facilities security accounts ....... $ 0 6 SECTION 14. Section 25, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 7 Sec. 25. (1) There is allocated to the State School Fun
count, the amount of [$16,338,103] 10 $16,338,216. 11 “ SECTION 15. Section 26, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 12 “ Sec. 26. Notwithstanding and in lieu of the percentag
a Account, the amount of [$16,338,103] $16,338,216. 29 “SECTION 15. Section 26, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 30 read: SB 5703-1 2/26/26 Proposed Amendments to SB 5703 Page
a Account, the amount of [$16,338,103] $16,338,216. 29 “SECTION 15. Section 26, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 30 read: SB 5703-1 2/26/26 Proposed Amendments to SB 5703 Page
Account, the amount of [$16,338,103] 23 $16,338,216. 24 SECTION 15. Section 26, chapter 632, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 25 Sec. 26. Notwithstanding and in lieu of the percentage-
Source title: Modifies amounts allocated from the Administrative Services Economic Development Fund, Veterans' Services Fund, Criminal Fine Account, Oregon Marijuana Account and Fund for Student Success.This source title may describe an earlier version. Read the current brief and version history above.
“Digest: The Act changes the allocation of money from certain funds. (Flesch Readability Score: 61.3). [ Digest: The Act is a budget bill for an unspecified state agency. (Flesch Readability Score: 64.9). ] [ Establishes biennial appropriations and expenditure limitations for ______ for the biennium ending June 30, 2027. ] Modifies amounts allocated from the Administrative Services Economic Development Fund, Veterans' Services Fund, Criminal Fine Account, Oregon Marijuana Account and Fund for Student Success. Declares an emergency, effective on passage.”
Oregon updates this record in place. This page uses the latest text; an exact original snapshot is unavailable.
Confirm with the official record.
Supplemental, source-linked analysis from project researchers and community contributors. It is separate from Oregon's official record.