HB 4115
Plain-language analysis
Generated analysis, not an official summary or legal advice. Confirm with linked Oregon documents.
HB 4115 extends the validity period for criminal background checks on caregivers and behavioral health providers from 18 months to three years, mandates that valid checks be portable across employers and care settings without requiring new checks solely due to a change in employment, requires Coordinated Care Organizations (CCOs) to reimburse behavioral health providers retroactively to their medical assistance program enrollment application date and prohibits CCOs from requiring new credentialing applications solely because a provider changes employers, and excludes state-operated secure residential treatment facilities from the definition of "residential facility" for background check purposes.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Staff analysis identifies "Current delays and administrative burden for background checks" and "Lack of background check portability in Oregon" as issues discussed during committee review.
Basis: Official analysis · Sources: Staff Measure Summary A; Staff Measure Summary A
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The measure likely aims to reduce workforce turnover and barriers to entry in the behavioral health and care sectors by eliminating redundant screening costs and administrative delays when workers move between agencies, while the retroactive reimbursement provision addresses cash-flow constraints that may deter providers from enrolling or accepting patients.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
Benefit from three-year check validity and portability across employers/settings; reduced administrative burden when changing jobs.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Obligated to reimburse providers retroactively to the enrollment application date; prohibited from requiring new credentialing applications solely due to a provider's change of employer.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Required to publish portability requirements, notify facilities of the three-year cycle, develop systems to maintain criminal records check information, prescribe rules for home health/in-home care checks, and communicate with behavioral health providers regarding contact updates and background check triggers.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Must accept portable valid checks; must conduct their own checks per new rules; excluded state hospital secure facilities are no longer subject to the "residential facility" definition for these checks.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Projected reduction in fee revenue due to fewer background check requests.
Basis: Official analysis · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Providers may switch employers more frequently without re-screening delays, increasing labor mobility. CCOs must adjust billing and credentialing workflows to honor retroactive payments and accept providers across employer changes.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
DHS/OHA must implement system modifications and publish criteria within 90 days of effective date. CCOs cannot use credentialing as a barrier to provider movement.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
OSP faces estimated revenue loss of $2 million in 2025-27 and $3.5 million in 2027-29. OHA may need additional staff for 20-40 new certificate applications annually. DHS can use existing resources for system updates.
Basis: Official analysis · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
No change to disqualifying crimes; fitness determination criteria remain but reference updated ORS 443.004 provisions.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Caregivers and clients
A home care worker with a valid check can immediately transition from an agency facing closure to one with open positions, maintaining continuous income and ensuring clients receive uninterrupted care without administrative gaps.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
Coordinated Care Organizations
A behavioral health provider submits an enrollment application in January but is not assigned an identification number until December; the CCO must reimburse services provided throughout the year retroactively to January, creating a significant unexpected financial liability for the CCO if the provider's patient volume is high.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
The text prohibits new credentialing apps solely due to employer change and mandates retroactive reimbursement to the application date, but does not specify enforcement mechanisms or audit protocols for CCOs, leaving room for misinterpretation or gaming of dates.
Sources · Enrolled
Reduces administrative friction and improves provider cash flow to address workforce shortages, but shifts financial risk to CCOs via retroactive reimbursement mandates and reduces state fee revenue while potentially straining OHA's capacity to manage increased application volumes.
CCOs face unpredictable financial liabilities from retroactive reimbursements based on application dates rather than service dates.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
OSP revenue loss may necessitate staff reductions in the background check unit, potentially impacting processing capacity.
Basis: Official analysis · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
The enrolled version incorporates the House amendments regarding retroactive reimbursement and OHA communication/portability for behavioral health providers, plus the exclusion of state hospital facilities. The enrolled bill extends background check validity to 3 years, mandates portability across employers/settings for caregivers, requires CCOs to reimburse providers retroactively to application date and prohibits new credentialing apps solely due to employer change, excludes state hospital secure facilities from "residential facility" definition, updates fingerprint handling/confidentiality, and clarifies fitness determination processes.
Excludes secure residential treatment facilities on Oregon State Hospital campus or state-operated from the definition of "residential facility" for background check purposes.
Narrows the scope of facilities subject to specific background check requirements.
Sources · Enrolled
Extends criminal records check validity from 18 months to three years for DHS/OHA checks.
Reduces frequency of required checks, lowering administrative burden and costs.
Sources · Enrolled
Prohibits DHS/OHA from requiring new checks solely due to employer/setting change if valid check exists; mandates portability information publication.
Ensures checks are portable, preventing redundant screening when workers move.
Sources · Enrolled
Requires CCOs to reimburse behavioral health providers retroactively to enrollment application date; prohibits new credentialing apps solely due to employer change.
Addresses provider cash-flow barriers and removes credentialing obstacles for job mobility.
Sources · Enrolled
Requires OHA to communicate with behavioral health providers about contact updates and background check triggers.
Improves provider awareness and compliance with credentialing requirements.
Sources · Enrolled
Updates fingerprint handling, confidentiality, and fitness determination processes in ORS 181A.195 and ORS 181A.200.
Aligns background check procedures with privacy standards and clarifies agency responsibilities.
Sources · Enrolled
Tradeoff: The enrolled version strengthens portability and provider financial protections compared to the previous text, which focused primarily on extending validity and excluding state hospital facilities; the addition of retroactive reimbursement and CCO credentialing restrictions shifts more financial and administrative obligations to payers while further reducing barriers for providers.
high confidence. The enrolled bill text provides clear statutory changes to background check validity, portability, CCO reimbursement obligations, and definitions. Supporting analysis confirms fiscal impacts and stated issues.
Possible effects if adopted; not current bill text.
If adopted, this proposed amendment would exclude state-operated secure residential treatment facilities from the statutory definition of 'residential facility' for background check purposes and mandate that coordinated care organizations (CCOs) reimburse behavioral health providers retroactively to the date they submitted an Oregon Health Authority (OHA) application for medical assistance program enrollment. This would eliminate credentialing-related payment delays for providers while creating a specific screening exemption for certain state hospital-affiliated facilities.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
Basis inference: The amendment appears designed to accelerate provider reimbursement timelines and streamline credentialing portability while aligning background check requirements with existing state hospital operational protocols. This is inferred from the text's explicit linkage of CCO reimbursement to the OHA application submission date rather than credentialing completion, and its carve-out of state-operated secure residential treatment facilities from the broader 'residential facility' definition.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
Would receive retroactive reimbursement starting from their OHA enrollment application date, reducing out-of-pocket costs and cash-flow delays during credentialing.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Must adjust billing and credentialing workflows to honor retroactive payments and cannot require new credentialing applications solely due to provider employer changes.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Would be excluded from the 'residential facility' background check definition, potentially altering their screening requirements compared to other residential care workers.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Must update systems and rules to recognize the new reimbursement trigger date and manage the expanded three-year background check cycle referenced in the base measure.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Staff Measure Summary A; Fiscal Impact Statement A
Providers will face shorter financial gaps between service delivery and payment, improving workforce retention in behavioral health.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
CCOs must implement administrative changes to track application submission dates versus credentialing completion dates for retroactive billing.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
The state hospital facility exemption may create a two-tier screening standard within the broader residential care sector, requiring clear internal compliance tracking.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Enforcement relies on OHA/DHS systems accurately capturing application dates and CCOs adhering to the non-duplication rule for credentialing.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Staff Measure Summary A
Behavioral health provider
A provider works full-time for six months while awaiting OHA credentialing approval. Under this amendment, they receive full retroactive reimbursement from day one of their application, preventing financial ruin and allowing them to remain in the workforce without taking a second job.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Coordinated care organization (CCO)
A CCO faces severe cash-flow strain or audit liability by being forced to reimburse services for providers who ultimately fail credentialing or whose applications were submitted years prior but never acted upon, creating open-ended retroactive billing exposure.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Weak enforcement of application date verification and ambiguous facility operational boundaries could enable duty creep or fraudulent billing claims.
Sources · Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
The measure trades reduced administrative friction and improved provider cash flow for potential retroactive billing liabilities for CCOs and a narrowed scope of background check coverage for specific state-operated facilities. Upsides include faster workforce placement and reduced credentialing delays; downsides include unpredictable financial exposure for payers and possible screening gaps for certain residential care workers.
Accelerates provider reimbursement, reducing out-of-pocket costs during credentialing.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Eliminates redundant credentialing applications when providers change employers, streamlining workforce mobility.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Creates open-ended retroactive billing exposure for CCOs if application dates are not strictly verified.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Excludes specific state-operated facilities from standard residential facility background checks, potentially creating inconsistent screening standards.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
high confidence. Analysis is grounded exclusively in the supplied proposed amendment text and official legislative revenue/fiscal documents. No enacted status or external speculation is applied.
If adopted, this amendment would extend the validity period of required criminal records checks for specified caregivers and behavioral health providers from 18 months to three years, mandate portability across employers and care settings, require Coordinated Care Organizations to reimburse providers retroactively to their medical assistance enrollment application date, and update fingerprint handling and fitness determination procedures for DHS and OHA. Material consequences include reduced administrative friction and costs for workers changing jobs, potential revenue loss for the Oregon State Police from fewer background checks, and new compliance and system-update obligations for state agencies and CCOs.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A; Fiscal Impact Statement A
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The text's focus on extending validity periods and prohibiting re-checks solely due to employer changes suggests an underlying legislative intent to address workforce shortages and retention issues in direct care and behavioral health sectors by reducing bureaucratic turnover barriers.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Would benefit from longer check validity and portability, reducing re-check costs and hiring delays when changing employers.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Would be required to process retroactive reimbursements for services rendered during the credentialing gap and prohibited from demanding new credentialing applications solely due to employer changes.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Would bear obligations to update systems, publish portability guidelines, notify facilities, and manage fitness determinations under revised criteria.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Would likely experience reduced fee revenue from background checks due to the extended validity cycle.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Workers would face fewer administrative hurdles and lower out-of-pocket costs when transitioning between care facilities, potentially accelerating hiring timelines. Facilities would need to verify portable checks rather than initiating new ones immediately. CCOs must adjust billing cycles to cover retroactive payments for behavioral health providers. DHS and OHA must develop and publish clear portability processes and update internal systems to track the three-year cycle. OSP may face budgetary pressures from decreased background check volume, potentially triggering staffing adjustments.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Fiscal Impact Statement A
Caregivers and vulnerable populations
A direct care worker with a valid three-year check moves between five different residential facilities and home health agencies within two years without interruption, fees, or administrative delays, maintaining continuous, uninterrupted support for vulnerable elderly clients while avoiding workforce attrition.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Care recipients and employers
An individual convicted of a disqualifying offense changes employers shortly after their initial check but before the new employer receives credible evidence of the conviction; the worker continues in a direct-contact role for months under the technically valid portable check, delaying protective intervention until the next cycle or complaint triggers a re-evaluation.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
The statutory framework relies on employer reporting and agency monitoring to catch duty changes or new convictions; gaps in those reporting mechanisms create the risk of prolonged exposure despite the portability provision.
Sources · Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Reducing administrative barriers and workforce turnover for caregivers improves access to care but requires robust monitoring systems to ensure that extended check validity does not compromise timely identification of new disqualifying conduct.
Faster hiring and onboarding timelines for direct care and behavioral health positions.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Lower out-of-pocket costs and administrative friction for workers transitioning between employers or care settings.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Improved continuity of care for vulnerable populations by reducing workforce attrition linked to screening delays.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential lag in detecting new disqualifying conduct due to the extended three-year validity window.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Reduced fee revenue for OSP, which may trigger staffing reductions in the background check unit.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Increased compliance complexity and administrative burden for DHS, OHA, and CCOs managing system updates, retroactive payments, and portability verification.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Fiscal Impact Statement A
high confidence. The amendment text is explicit regarding validity periods, portability prohibitions, reimbursement mandates, and agency obligations. Fiscal impacts are documented by official legislative offices. Remaining uncertainties relate to implementation rules, enforcement thresholds, and provider workforce data not yet published.
If adopted, the amendment would require coordinated care organizations (CCOs) to reimburse behavioral health providers employed by contracting agencies for services rendered back to the date the provider submitted their Oregon Health Authority medical assistance enrollment application. This shifts the financial burden of credentialing delays from providers to CCOs and clarifies that reimbursement eligibility begins at application submission rather than provider ID assignment.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The amendment likely aims to resolve ambiguity about when retroactive billing begins during the OHA enrollment process, ensuring providers are compensated for services delivered while awaiting formal credentialing.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Staff Measure Summary A; Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Gain guaranteed retroactive reimbursement for services rendered during OHA processing delays, improving cash flow and reducing administrative friction.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Assume financial liability for reimbursing providers from the application submission date and must adjust billing/credentialing workflows to track this timeline.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Faces indirect administrative pressure to process enrollment applications efficiently, as delays directly increase CCO reimbursement obligations.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Experience reduced risk of provider turnover or service disruption caused by credentialing bottlenecks.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Providers will no longer absorb unpaid work during OHA processing periods, reducing administrative friction and improving service continuity.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
CCOs must implement tracking mechanisms to verify application submission dates and may face increased short-term costs.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
The measure clarifies that changing employers does not trigger a new credentialing application, streamlining provider mobility.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Staff Measure Summary A
Enforcement relies on accurate record-keeping of application dates and OHA processing timelines. The amendment modifies Oregon state reimbursement mechanics for CCOs and does not alter federal Medicaid definitions, even though it references OHA enrollment processes.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Behavioral health providers employed by agencies contracting with CCOs
A behavioral health provider submits an OHA enrollment application in January but experiences a six-month processing delay. Under this amendment, the CCO must reimburse the provider for all services delivered to members during those six months, preventing provider bankruptcy and ensuring uninterrupted care for vulnerable populations.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Coordinated Care Organizations (CCOs)
A provider submits an OHA application but fails to meet eligibility requirements or is denied, yet continues billing the CCO retroactively from the original submission date. Without strict verification, this could allow uncredentialed individuals to collect payment for services they were never legally authorized to provide.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
The distinction lies between lawful reimbursement for services rendered during a valid pending application versus fraudulent billing for uncredentialed or ineligible providers.
Sources · Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
The measure protects provider financial stability and care continuity but transfers credentialing delay costs to CCOs and requires strict application-date verification to prevent billing for uncredentialed services. Upsides include reduced provider turnover and smoother service delivery; downsides include increased CCO administrative burdens and potential revenue leakage if submission dates are not rigorously audited.
Reduced provider turnover and improved cash flow during credentialing delays.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Streamlined employer mobility for behavioral health providers without triggering redundant credentialing applications.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Staff Measure Summary A
Increased short-term financial liability and administrative tracking requirements for CCOs.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Risk of reimbursement claims extending indefinitely if OHA processing times are not monitored or capped.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
high confidence. The amendment text is explicit regarding reimbursement timing and scope. Fiscal impacts are noted as minimal or indeterminate in official sources, but the mechanical change to CCO obligations is clear.
If adopted, the amendment extends the validity period for criminal background checks on specified care workers from 18 months to three years, mandates that valid checks be portable across employers and care settings without requiring re-checks, and requires coordinated care organizations to reimburse behavioral health providers retroactively to their Medicaid enrollment application date. Material consequences include reduced administrative turnover costs and faster provider network access for Medicaid recipients, offset by decreased fee revenue for the Oregon State Police background check unit and increased reliance on accurate cross-agency tracking of check expiration dates.
Basis: Bill text · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Fiscal Impact Statement A
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
Lawmakers may aim to reduce caregiver turnover and streamline behavioral health credentialing to expand Medicaid service capacity by removing redundant screening barriers.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
Benefit from a longer three-year check validity and portability across employers, reducing re-check frequency, out-of-pocket fees, and administrative delays when changing jobs.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Benefit from streamlined credentialing with coordinated care organizations, prohibition of redundant applications upon employer change, and clearer Oregon Health Authority guidance on contact updates and background check triggers.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Obligated to process retroactive Medicaid reimbursements to providers and cannot demand new credentialing applications solely due to provider employer changes, requiring billing system and compliance adjustments.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
OSP faces projected fee revenue declines that may trigger staffing reductions; DHS and OHA must update tracking systems, publish portability criteria, and notify facilities of the new three-year cycle within 90 days.
Basis: Bill text · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Fiscal Impact Statement A
Providers may change employers or care settings without immediate re-screening if a valid check exists, reducing administrative friction but requiring robust tracking systems to monitor expiration dates across multiple agencies.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
CCOs must adjust reimbursement workflows to honor retroactive payments to the provider's initial application date, potentially increasing short-term cash flow demands while improving long-term provider retention.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
The measure amends Oregon statutes (ORS 443.004, 181A.195, 181A.200, 443.008) and remains an Oregon-law change; definitions incorporated by reference to federal or other state statutes do not alter the jurisdictional scope of the screening requirements.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Caregiver
A caregiver with a valid three-year check moves between five different facilities over two years without interruption, maintaining continuous income and care continuity for vulnerable clients while avoiding repeated fees and processing delays.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Provider/Facility
A provider changes employers but fails to update their contact information with OHA as required; a new employer relies on the portable check, which expires or is invalidated by an unreported charge, resulting in a lapse in screening before the individual begins unsupervised care with a vulnerable population.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
bill_text
Sources · Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
The measure trades reduced screening frequency and administrative costs for providers against potential delays in detecting new criminal activity during the extended three-year validity period.
Lower turnover barriers and out-of-pocket costs for care workers changing jobs.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Faster Medicaid provider network access through streamlined credentialing and retroactive reimbursement mandates.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Reduced administrative burden for DHS, OHA, and facilities by standardizing a three-year cycle.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Decreased fee revenue for OSP background check processing, potentially triggering staffing reductions that could slow future screening turnaround times.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Increased reliance on accurate self-reporting of status changes and cross-agency data synchronization to prevent screening gaps.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Short-term cash flow and administrative strain on CCOs processing retroactive reimbursements.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
high confidence. Analysis is grounded in the supplied proposed amendment text and official legislative revenue/fiscal summaries. No enacted status or unverified external claims are used.
41 records currently loaded
Records available in the current snapshot.
Earliest loaded signal
Introduced bill text posted
Posted Jan 28, 2026, 3:25 PM PST
Follow the official text for HB 4115 and every amendment branch. Connections come from each amendment's stated base. Horizontal position shows when each document was first posted, when available.
Click a card to isolate its connected lines; use View summary to jump to its details. Horizontal position shows first posting time in Pacific Time. Drag or use the arrow keys to pan. Pinch with two fingers on mobile, or zoom with the controls, +/− keys, or Control/Command + scroll; press 0 to reset. Dashed branches remained proposals.
Selected document summary
Targeted changes
What the document says to change
On page 1 of the printed bill, delete lines 5 through 23 and delete pages 2 2 through 11 and insert: 3 “SECTION 1.
No deeper official pre-number history was found.
Chief sponsors: Representative Nancy Nathanson, Representative Anna Scharf, Representative Hai Pham
Regular sponsors: Representative Mark Gamba, Representative Cyrus Javadi, Representative Jules Walters, Representative Lamar Wise, Senator Sara Gelser Blouin, Representative Tom Andersen, Representative Sue Rieke Smith, Representative Darin Harbick
House carrier
Representative Nancy Nathanson
Third Reading Of House Bills · Version A
Senate carrier
Senator Sara Gelser Blouin
Third Reading Of House Measures · Version A
A carrier presents the measure or report but is not necessarily its sponsor or author.
Records already listed in Activity are not repeated here.
Official origin records are incomplete; missing facts are not inferred.
41 events
Full timeline
41 entries shown.
Chapter 59, (2026 Laws): Effective date June 5, 2026.
Governor signed.
President signed.
Speaker signed.
Third reading. Carried by Gelser Blouin. Passed.
Ayes, 22; Nays, 8--Anderson, Hayden, Linthicum, Robinson, Smith DB, Starr, Thatcher, Weber.
Second reading.
Recommendation: Do pass the A-Eng. bill.
Staff Measure Summary · Version A
Referred to Ways and Means.
First reading. Referred to President's desk.
Third reading. Carried by Nathanson. Passed.
Ayes, 42; Excused, 17--Boshart Davis, Diehl, Edwards, Helfrich, Javadi, Lewis, Mannix, McIntire, Nelson, Osborne, Pham H, Reschke, Skarlatos, Tran, Valderrama, Wright, Yunker; Excused for Business of the House, 1--Hartman.
Second reading.
Recommendation: Do pass.
Work Session held.
Work Session
Heard and Reported Out · Agenda item 4 · Room HR 40 · Relating to health care providers; prescribing an effective date (Senator Campos, carrier)
Returned to Full Committee.
Work Session held.
Work Session
Heard and Reported Out · Agenda item 2 · Room HR G · Relating to health care providers; prescribing an effective date
Assigned to Subcommittee On Human Services.
House Amendments to Introduced bill text posted
Referred to Ways and Means by prior reference.
Recommendation: Do pass with amendments, be printed A-Engrossed, and be referred to Ways and Means by prior reference.
Work Session held.
Work Session
Heard and Reported Out with Amendments · Agenda item 4 · Room HR 50 · CARRIED OVER FROM THE 2/10/2026 MEETING: Provides that a criminal records check on certain caregivers shall last for three years, subject to exceptions.
IS_Impact HB 4115 3
Revenue Impact Statement
Amendment -3 adopted
Work Session
Not Heard · Agenda item 4 · Room HR 50 · Provides that a criminal records check on certain caregivers shall last for three years, subject to exceptions.
Amendment -1 proposed
Amendment -2 proposed
Public Hearing held.
Public Hearing
Heard · Agenda item 7 · Room HR 50 · Provides that a criminal records check on certain caregivers shall last for three years, subject to exceptions.
Amendment -1 proposed
Referred to Behavioral Health with subsequent referral to Ways and Means.
First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
“Enrolled bill text posted”
Confirm with the official record.
Supplemental, source-linked analysis from project researchers and community contributors. It is separate from Oregon's official record.