HB 4034
Plain-language analysis
Generated analysis, not an official summary or legal advice. Confirm with linked Oregon documents.
HB 4034 transfers regulatory oversight of animal rescue entities from the State Veterinarian to the Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA), excludes veterinary facilities and fish from the definition, and delegates detailed recordkeeping and licensing rules to ODA. Entities keeping 10 or more animals for over two consecutive days must obtain an ODA license, maintain records per ODA rules, pay enforcement-based fees, and face civil penalties up to $500 per violation; the statute removes the ability to transfer licenses and omits statutory impoundment authority.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The text defers specific recordkeeping details and licensing criteria to ODA rulemaking while mandating stakeholder input from rural/urban rescues, transporters, and service providers, suggesting a rationale to tailor regulations through administrative flexibility and inclusive consultation rather than rigid statutory mandates.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Enrolled; Staff Measure Summary A
Must comply with ODA rules for records and licensing if holding 10 or more animals for over two consecutive days; subject to inspections, fees, and civil penalties up to $500 per violation; cannot transfer licenses. All AREs appear subject to record-keeping requirements regardless of size, though licensing is threshold-based.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Explicitly excluded from the definition of animal rescue entities; no longer subject to this licensing regime.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Gains enforcement, inspection, rulemaking, and fee-collection authority over AREs; must solicit stakeholder input during rulemaking.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Loses enforcement authority over animal rescue entities.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Retain on-site investigation rights for licensed entities; receive cruelty reports from ODA.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Entities must maintain records per future ODA rules and apply for licenses if meeting the threshold. License fees cover actual enforcement costs; compliance costs depend on ODA rules.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
ODA investigates unlicensed operation, licensed compliance, and credible/serious complaints. Civil penalties up to $500 per violation; license denial/suspension/revocation available. No statutory impoundment authority.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Rural Animal Rescue Entities
A rural rescue entity successfully leverages the mandated stakeholder input process to shape ODA rules that accommodate its unique infrastructure and low-cost service model, resulting in a feasible licensing path with fees aligned to actual enforcement costs.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
Threshold Animal Rescue Entity
An entity operating exactly at the threshold faces license revocation for a technical recordkeeping error under strict ODA rules, halting operations without statutory impoundment protections or clear remediation steps.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
The text grants ODA significant rulemaking authority and enforcement discretion while relying on vague thresholds like 'credible and serious' complaints, creating opportunities for inconsistent application or regulatory overreach if unchecked.
Sources · Enrolled
Centralizing oversight under ODA and deferring details to rulemaking enables adaptive, stakeholder-informed regulation but creates compliance uncertainty for entities awaiting rules and concentrates significant regulatory discretion in one agency without explicit statutory limits on rule content.
The enrolled version consolidates enforcement authority exclusively under the Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA), removing references to the State Veterinarian as the enforcing agency. It finalizes the exclusion of veterinary facilities and fish from the definition, removes the statutory ability to transfer licenses, and omits impoundment authority. The House Amendments had already deferred recordkeeping details to ODA rules and removed specific statutory record requirements; the enrolled version maintains this deference while clarifying the scope of ODA's rulemaking mandate and stakeholder consultation requirements.
Authority transferred from State Veterinarian to ODA; license transfer provision removed; impoundment authority omitted.
Centralizes oversight under ODA, eliminates license portability, and removes statutory impoundment power.
Sources · Enrolled; House Amendments to Introduced
Definition of 'animal' excludes fish; veterinary facilities explicitly excluded.
Narrows regulatory scope to mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians; exempts veterinary practices.
Sources · Enrolled; House Amendments to Introduced
Recordkeeping details deferred to ODA rules; licensing threshold remains 10+ animals for >2 days.
Provides flexibility in regulation while maintaining a clear licensing trigger.
Sources · Enrolled; House Amendments to Introduced
Tradeoff: The shift from State Veterinarian to ODA oversight may improve administrative efficiency but concentrates regulatory power in one agency without explicit statutory limits on rule content.
high confidence. Analysis based on enrolled bill text and official staff summaries; no speculation presented as fact.
Possible effects if adopted; not current bill text.
The amendment removes veterinary facilities and fish from the statutory definition of animal rescue entities (AREs), deletes detailed recordkeeping mandates, transfers enforcement authority from the State Veterinarian to the Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA), and delegates licensing standards, audit processes, and fee structures to future ODA rulemaking. If adopted, it narrows direct regulatory coverage, shifts administrative oversight to ODA, and requires AREs keeping 10 or more animals for more than two consecutive business days to comply with agency-developed rules rather than fixed statutory requirements.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The legislature may intend to reduce direct statutory compliance burdens on veterinary practices and small-scale rescues while consolidating administrative oversight under ODA. This hypothesis is drawn from the explicit exclusion of veterinary facilities, removal of fish from the animal definition, deletion of detailed recordkeeping mandates, and delegation of rulemaking authority to ODA.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Excluded from the ARE definition and licensing/recordkeeping requirements, removing them from this regulatory framework entirely.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Subject to ODA oversight instead of the State Veterinarian; must comply with future ODA rules for recordkeeping, auditing, and licensing if they keep 10 or more animals for more than two consecutive business days.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Gains enforcement authority, rulemaking responsibility, and fee collection/dedication for implementing the program.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Exempt from licensing and recordkeeping mandates under this statute.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
ODA must draft rules, establish audit/licensing processes, set fees, and conduct investigations, shifting operational responsibility from the State Veterinarian.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
AREs face a transition period with uncertain compliance standards until ODA finalizes rules; specific record formats will be determined by agency rule rather than statute.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Civil penalties remain capped at $500 per violation, with license denial, suspension, or revocation as enforcement tools; animal impoundment is removed as a penalty option.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Rulemaking requires ODA to solicit input from rural and urban AREs, animal transporters, and organizations providing free or low-cost animal care services.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Small-scale rescues
A grassroots rescue network operating nine animals avoids licensing fees and administrative overhead entirely, redirecting all resources toward direct animal care and community outreach.
Basis: Inferred
Animal rescue entities
ODA adopts restrictive or costly rulemaking standards that lack clear statutory guidance, forcing legitimate rescues into noncompliance due to technical capacity limits and risking license revocation without predictable enforcement thresholds.
Basis: Inferred
The text delegates significant administrative discretion to ODA while removing specific statutory guardrails, creating conditions where fee structures or audit criteria could functionally exclude eligible operators or exceed statutory scope if not carefully bounded by rulemaking procedures.
Sources · Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Centralizing oversight under ODA and narrowing statutory definitions reduces direct regulatory burden on certain entities but delegates critical standards to future rulemaking, creating uncertainty for operators until rules are finalized.
Streamlined administration and clearer exclusion of veterinary practice from rescue licensing.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Loss of specific statutory recordkeeping safeguards, reliance on agency discretion for fees/standards, and potential compliance gaps during transition.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
high confidence. The amendment text is explicit regarding scope changes, authority transfer, and rulemaking delegation. Official fiscal and revenue impacts confirm no direct state/local revenue change. Remaining uncertainties relate to future agency implementation rather than statutory ambiguity.
35 records currently loaded
Records available in the current snapshot.
Earliest loaded signal
Introduced bill text posted
Posted Jan 28, 2026, 3:25 PM PST
Follow the official text for HB 4034 and every amendment branch. Connections come from each amendment's stated base. Horizontal position shows when each document was first posted, when available.
Click a card to isolate its connected lines; use View summary to jump to its details. Horizontal position shows first posting time in Pacific Time. Drag or use the arrow keys to pan. Pinch with two fingers on mobile, or zoom with the controls, +/− keys, or Control/Command + scroll; press 0 to reset. Dashed branches remained proposals.
Selected document summary
Substantial replacement
What the document says to change
delete lines 1 through 19 and insert:
Official records (1)
No deeper official pre-number history was found.
Chief sponsors: Representative Bobby Levy, Senator Courtney Neron Misslin
Regular sponsors: Representative Tom Andersen, Representative Court Boice, Representative Darcey Edwards, Representative David Gomberg, Representative Jeffrey Helfrich, Representative Ken Helm, Representative Rick Lewis, Representative Virgle Osborne, Representative Mark Owens, Representative Anna Scharf, Representative Alek Skarlatos, Representative Dwayne Yunker, Senator Todd Nash, Representative Susan McLain, Representative Sarah McDonald, Representative E. Werner Reschke, Senator Janeen Sollman
House carrier
Representative Bobby Levy
Third Reading Of House Bills · Version A
Senate carrier
Senator Courtney Neron Misslin
Third Reading Of House Measures · Version A
A carrier presents the measure or report but is not necessarily its sponsor or author.
Records already listed in Activity are not repeated here.
Official origin records are incomplete; missing facts are not inferred.
35 events
Full timeline
35 entries shown.
Chapter 13, (2026 Laws): Effective date January 1, 2027.
Governor signed.
President signed.
Speaker signed.
Third reading. Carried by Neron Misslin. Passed.
Ayes, 29; Excused, 1--Smith DB.
Carried over to 02-25 by unanimous consent.
Second reading.
Recommendation: Do pass the A-Eng. bill.
Work Session held.
Work Session
Heard and Reported Out · Agenda item 3 · Room HR D · Revises the definition of "animal rescue entity.
IS_Impact HB 4034 A
Revenue Impact Statement
Public Hearing held.
Public Hearing
Heard · Agenda item 1 · Room HR D · Revises the definition of "animal rescue entity.
Referred to Natural Resources and Wildfire.
First reading. Referred to President's desk.
Third reading. Carried by Levy B. Passed.
Ayes, 58; Excused, 1--Valderrama; Excused for Business of the House, 1--Diehl.
Second reading.
House Amendments to Introduced bill text posted
Subsequent referral to Ways and Means rescinded by order of the Speaker.
Recommendation: Do pass with amendments, be printed A-Engrossed, and subsequent referral to Ways and Means be rescinded.
Work Session held.
Work Session
Heard and Reported Out with Amendments · Agenda item 3 · Room HR 70 · Provides that veterinary facilities do not qualify as animal rescue entities for purposes of regulating animal rescue entities.
IS_Impact HB 4034 2
Revenue Impact Statement
Amendment -2 adopted
Public Hearing held.
Public Hearing
Heard · Agenda item 7 · Room HR 70 · Provides that veterinary facilities do not qualify as animal rescue entities for purposes of regulating animal rescue entities.
Referred to Agriculture, Land Use, Natural Resources, and Water with subsequent referral to Ways and Means.
First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
ore animals at one time in its legal custody and solicits or accepts donations. Senate Bill 883 (2019) created the ARE Licensing Program to establish statewide licensing and r
al custody 10 or more animals at a time and that solicits or accepts donations. Senate Bill 883 (2019) established the ARE Licensing Program to regulate statewide recordkeepin
“Revises the definition of "animal rescue entity.”
Confirm with the official record.
Supplemental, source-linked analysis from project researchers and community contributors. It is separate from Oregon's official record.