HB 4035
Plain-language analysis
Generated analysis, not an official summary or legal advice. Confirm with linked Oregon documents.
HB 4035 modifies Oregon's one-time urban growth boundary (UGB) expansion process established by SB 1537 (2024) by increasing maximum acreage limits to 150 net buildable acres for cities with populations of 25,000 or greater and 50 acres for smaller cities, broadening eligibility for 'other land' based on surrounding resource coverage, updating affordability need metrics to American Community Survey data, and creating expedited processes with specific exemptions for the cities of Woodburn and Monmouth. The measure imposes binding density and affordability mandates requiring at least 30 percent of residential units to be restricted for 60 years, sunsets all amended provisions on January 2, 2033, and takes effect immediately via an emergency clause.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The measure may aim to accelerate housing production by utilizing marginal lands previously ineligible for expansion. Allowing 'other land' additions when resource land constitutes more than 80 percent of the surrounding quarter-mile and no higher-priority applications exist suggests a policy shift to prioritize development on less constrained parcels when preferred options are unavailable.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
May add sites up to 150 net buildable acres (or 50 for smaller cities) if they demonstrate need and meet site eligibility criteria. Must adopt binding conceptual plans with specific density, affordability, and commercial requirements. County approval is mandatory but classified as non-land use.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
May petition Metro to add sites designated as urban reserves. Metro must determine compliance within 120 days and adopt amendments unless total additions exceed 300 net buildable acres, subject to deadlines based on petition timing.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Must approve UGB amendments made by cities under this process and cooperate with annexation. County decisions are explicitly not land use decisions, limiting review authority.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Sites require signed consent from all owners and annexation agreements. Development must include affordable units deed-restricted for 60 years, with construction of affordable units commencing before the last 15 percent of market rate certificates of occupancy are issued.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Exempt from soliciting applications, public comment periods, and higher-priority land checks. Must adopt a master plan requiring no fewer than 600 residential units meeting density and affordability standards. DLCD reviews submissions within 30 days.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Authorized to exchange land (remove up to 90 acres, add up to 75 net buildable acres) under specific flood/wetland constraints without standard UGB expansion rules or landowner consent for removal.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Reviews Woodburn submissions; authorized to issue grants for planning services and model regulations. Reviews Monmouth exchanges.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Cities may pursue UGB expansions more readily due to increased acreage limits and broader eligibility for 'other land' when surrounding resource land exceeds 80 percent. Binding conceptual plans will require diverse housing types, middle housing, accessible housing, and commercial uses serving immediate residents.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Development obligations include minimum densities ranging from 5 to 17 units per net buildable acre depending on city population and location. Affordable housing requirements mandate at least 30 percent of units restricted for 60 years, with rental affordability capped at 80 percent AMI and purchase affordability at 130 percent AMI.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Fiscal impact is minimal per official analysis. Cities may offset greater affordability requirements by proportionally reducing permits, fees, system development charges, property taxes, or land acquisition costs.
Basis: Bill text · Sources: Enrolled; Fiscal Impact Statement B
Affordable unit requirements must be recorded before building permits are issued and include financial penalties for noncompliance. DLCD must issue orders on Woodburn submissions within 30 days.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
City with high housing need and limited developed land
A qualifying city could add 150 net buildable acres of 'other land' surrounded by resources, creating a complete community with mandatory affordable units and diverse housing types, rapidly increasing housing supply while ensuring long-term affordability protections.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
City of Woodburn or Monmouth
Woodburn could bypass public participation and higher-priority land checks to add a site with minimal community input, potentially impacting floodplains or infrastructure. Monmouth could remove land from the UGB without landowner consent, even if more than one-quarter is mapped as flood hazard or wetland, risking environmental exposure.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
The text distinguishes between the legal allowance of exemptions and thresholds and the risk that administrative manipulation or misclassification could undermine the intent of priority rankings and public participation.
Sources · Enrolled
The measure trades expanded housing supply capacity and streamlined expansion eligibility for reduced local discretion over land prioritization and mandatory affordability and density mandates.
Increases available land for development by raising acreage limits and broadening 'other land' eligibility, potentially accelerating housing production.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Guarantees long-term affordability through 60-year deed restrictions and ensures diverse housing types, middle housing, and accessible units in new expansions.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Reduces community input and local discretion, particularly through Woodburn exemptions and county non-land-use classifications.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Mandatory density and affordability requirements may increase development costs or constrain housing type diversity if cities do not proportionally offset costs.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
The enrolled bill incorporates the Senate amendments. The overlapping provisions in both texts—including Section 11 (Woodburn exceptions), Section 12 (Repeals), and Section 6 (Application review procedures)—are substantively identical. The enrolled text introduces specific acreage limits of up to 150 net buildable acres for cities with populations of 25,000 or greater and up to 50 for smaller cities, defines 'net buildable acre' explicitly, and sets density requirements; these provisions are not present in the supplied previous text snippet, which consists primarily of amendment markup. Based on the supplied texts, no substantive changes exist between the enrolled bill and the Senate Amendments for the sections they share.
No substantive change identified.
Tradeoff: The measure trades expanded housing supply capacity and streamlined expansion eligibility for reduced local discretion over land prioritization and mandatory affordability and density mandates.
high confidence. Analysis is grounded in the enrolled bill text and official supporting sources. Comparison is limited by the supplied previous text being an amendment markup rather than a full bill version; overlapping provisions are substantively identical.
Possible effects if adopted; not current bill text.
If adopted, HB 4035-A4 would modify Oregon’s temporary one-time urban growth boundary expansion process by adding mandatory public consultation and notice requirements for qualifying cities, while simultaneously creating a streamlined, exemption-heavy pathway specifically for the City of Woodburn that bypasses those new public participation steps but requires a DLCD-approved master plan guaranteeing at least 600 residential units. The measure would sunset the entire temporary framework on January 2, 2033.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A; Staff Measure Summary B
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The amendment likely aims to balance expanded public input for general UGB expansions with an expedited development pathway for Woodburn, possibly to address local housing supply constraints or site-specific readiness by bypassing standard procedural delays while ensuring state oversight via DLCD and a fixed unit minimum.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary B
Exempted from standard public comment periods, planning commission/council meetings, and conceptual plan requirements; must instead adopt a master plan meeting all conceptual plan standards plus a 600-unit floor, and submit to expedited DLCD review within strict deadlines.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Subject to new mandatory public participation steps (notice, comment periods, planning council/open house meetings) and consultation requirements before selecting a site.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Owners must provide written consent to annexation; non-signatory residents must receive notice of completed applications. Woodburn’s process bypasses broader community notification, while other cities must implement it.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Receive mandatory notices from Woodburn; DLCD gains authority to approve or remand Woodburn’s submittals within a strict 30-day window, shifting oversight concentration to the state level.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Behavior and obligations shift for local planning staff to implement new public notice, comment period, and consultation protocols for general applicants. Woodburn must draft a compliant master plan meeting density, affordability, and greenspace standards, then coordinate closely with DLCD on tight deadlines.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Fiscal impact remains minimal per official revenue and fiscal statements; administrative costs shift to local planning departments and DLCD for review. Eligibility for UGB expansion remains tied to existing need demonstrations and site criteria, though Woodburn’s process is accelerated.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: IS_Impact HB 4035 A4; Fiscal Impact Statement B
Enforcement and access change: DLCD’s 30-day review creates a strict timeline for state oversight of Woodburn’s expansion, reducing uncertainty but concentrating approval authority at the state level. Public access to the process is expanded for general applicants but narrowed for Woodburn due to procedural exemptions.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Jurisdictional note: The amendment modifies Oregon’s temporary UGB expansion framework (ORS 197A/Chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024). While it references federal data sources for affordability thresholds, the legal change, procedural requirements, and oversight mechanisms remain strictly within Oregon state and local jurisdiction.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Woodburn residents and regional housing market
Woodburn rapidly delivers 600+ new residential units within a year by bypassing lengthy public hearings and conceptual plan negotiations, significantly accelerating housing supply in a constrained market while maintaining state-level compliance checks.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Adjacent jurisdictions and infrastructure systems
DLCD remands Woodburn’s master plan for minor technical deficiencies near the 30-day deadline, triggering appeals that stall development for years; alternatively, the exemption from public participation allows a single property owner or developer to secure UGB inclusion without community input, leading to infrastructure strain, utility capacity shortfalls, or affordability disputes.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
The statutory carve-out creates procedural asymmetry that, without clear administrative guardrails, may enable selective application of public process requirements or premature state approval.
Sources · Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
The measure trades expanded public participation and procedural uniformity for accelerated, state-supervised development in Woodburn while maintaining a sunset date.
Faster housing delivery and reduced administrative delays for a specific municipality.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Guaranteed unit minimum (600) and state-level compliance checks reduce long-term development uncertainty.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Reduced community input for Woodburn’s expansion and potential inequities between municipalities.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Reliance on tight state review timelines that may compromise thoroughness or trigger procedural bottlenecks.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
high confidence. The amendment text is explicit regarding procedural changes, exemptions, unit minimums, and sunset dates. Fiscal impacts are officially documented as minimal. Inferences are bounded to the statutory language and official staff summaries.
If adopted, the amendment modifies Oregon’s temporary urban growth boundary expansion program by lowering affordability thresholds, increasing maximum acreage limits for qualifying cities, clarifying site eligibility criteria, imposing mandatory density and complete-community requirements on conceptual plans, creating a streamlined process for small sites, establishing a tailored UGB exchange mechanism for the City of Monmouth, updating sunset dates to 2033, and authorizing the Land Conservation and Development Commission to issue grants. Material consequences include accelerated residential development pathways for qualifying municipalities, stricter affordability and utility assurance obligations for developers, and shifted administrative review duties to counties and DLCD.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The amendment likely responds to workgroup recommendations and local housing supply constraints by streamlining eligibility and increasing acreage allowances to accelerate residential development while maintaining affordability safeguards. Basis: Staff summaries reference workgroup recommendations and density requirements; the text lowers cost-burden thresholds, increases acreage caps from 100 to 150 for larger cities, clarifies 'other land' eligibility, and adds a specific UGB exchange process for Monmouth.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: IS_Impact HB 4035 A; Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Gain expanded eligibility to add up to 150 net buildable acres and clearer pathways for 'other land,' but must adopt binding conceptual plans with mandated density, affordability, and commercial/open space components.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Must process city petitions within 120 days, adopt boundary amendments if compliant (capped at 300 total acres), and cannot hold hearings to review or select petitions.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Face mandatory approval of compliant amendments without land-use decision classification, accelerated review timelines for Monmouth, and potential grant administration duties under amended ORS 197.045.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment; Introduced
Must secure enforceable agreements for utility service and affordability covenants (30% of units restricted for 60 years at specified AMI levels), but benefit from clarified site definitions and reduced procedural hurdles for sites under 15 acres.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Receives a customized UGB exchange process allowing removal of up to 90 acres (with >25% flood/wetland designation) and addition of up to 75 net buildable acres, exempted from standard public notice and priority-application requirements.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Municipalities must verify need using ACS five-year estimates rather than CHAS data, adopt conceptual plans meeting strict density minimums (5–17 units per net buildable acre depending on population), and secure utility capacity assurances.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
Developers face mandatory 60-year affordability covenants for 30% of residential units but gain predictable entitlement pathways.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Counties and DLCD will process amendments as non-land-use decisions, reducing judicial review exposure but increasing administrative coordination demands.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
The emergency clause triggers immediate effectiveness upon passage.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Qualifying cities with verified housing shortages
A city rapidly qualifies under the lowered thresholds, adds 150 net buildable acres with mandated middle housing and affordable units, and resolves a multi-year development backlog within two years.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Ecological and agricultural stakeholders
A municipality manipulates the 'other land' priority ranking or misclassifies surrounding acreage to approve development on ecologically sensitive or agriculturally valuable parcels, triggering irreversible environmental degradation and undermining statewide planning goals despite the 80% resource land threshold.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
The text legally permits cities to add 'other land' when more than 80 percent of the surrounding quarter-mile is resource land and no higher-priority applications exist. Weak enforcement, misclassification of land designations, or strategic manipulation of utility adjacency definitions could enable development on protected or environmentally constrained parcels, effectively bypassing the intent of statewide land use planning goals without violating the letter of the statute.
Sources · Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Accelerating housing production through streamlined eligibility and increased acreage limits trades off against potential environmental encroachment and reduced local discretion over land use planning. Upsides include faster affordable housing delivery, clearer developer pathways, and targeted municipal relief. Downsides include risk of undermining resource land protections, uniform density mandates that may not align with community character, and shifted administrative burdens to counties and DLCD.
Faster affordable housing delivery
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Clearer developer pathways
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Targeted municipal relief
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Risk of undermining resource land protections
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Uniform density mandates that may not align with community character
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Shifted administrative burdens to counties and DLCD
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
high confidence. Analysis is grounded exclusively in the supplied proposed amendment text and official legislative revenue/fiscal/staff summaries. No external speculation or unverified claims are included.
If adopted, this proposed amendment would expand eligibility and increase allowable acreage for cities outside Metro to add land to their urban growth boundaries under Oregon’s temporary housing program, lower the threshold for demonstrating affordable housing need by removing the “severely” cost- or rent-burdened requirement and switching data sources to the American Community Survey, replace vague development status criteria with specific structural and utility benchmarks, mandate public notice procedures, authorize the Land Conservation and Development Commission to issue grants, and sunset the program on January 2, 2033. Material consequences include faster UGB expansions for qualifying cities, potential increases in residential land supply, shifted affordability eligibility metrics, and new administrative obligations for local governments and the state commission.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The amendment likely aims to accelerate housing production by lowering administrative and eligibility barriers while preserving environmental prioritization thresholds, as inferred from the removal of restrictive affordability qualifiers, the expansion of allowable acreage, and the addition of an 80 percent resource land threshold for non-priority sites.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
Gain expanded eligibility for UGB additions, higher acreage caps (up to 150 acres), and modified need-demonstration metrics requiring public notice issuance.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Must approve compliant boundary amendments and coordinate annexation functions without triggering land use decision status, reducing review obligations while mandating cooperation.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Gains explicit authority to issue grants alongside contracts for program implementation and oversees the January 2, 2033 sunset.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Face updated site qualification standards, including specific structural/utility criteria and prioritization requirements for “other land.”
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Experience shifted affordability eligibility thresholds based on American Community Survey data rather than state or federal housing strategy metrics.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Eligibility & Behavior: Cities can qualify with lower cost-burden thresholds and must now issue public notices at least 45 days before selecting a site, increasing transparency but adding procedural steps.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Obligations & Costs: Local governments must prepare binding conceptual plans or master plans meeting density and affordability standards; counties must coordinate annexation facilitation without incurring land use review obligations.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Access & Risk: The 150-acre cap for larger cities may accelerate housing supply, but reliance on ACS five-year estimates could delay or alter need determinations depending on data release cycles. Infrastructure readiness remains a constraint due to the requirement that tracts not be adjacent to suitable public utilities.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Qualifying Cities & Households
A city with documented cost-burdened households successfully utilizes the expanded 150-acre allowance and streamlined eligibility to rapidly annex and develop a complete community, significantly increasing affordable housing stock and reducing regional homelessness without waiting for traditional UGB expansion cycles.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Regional Ecosystems & Infrastructure Networks
A city exploits the “other land” pathway by manipulating parcel configurations to meet the 80 percent surrounding resource land threshold, adding 150 acres to its boundary in an area lacking utility infrastructure or environmental safeguards, resulting in stranded development costs and ecological degradation before the program sunsets.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
The distinction between lawful administrative flexibility and unlawful evasion of resource land safeguards hinges on enforcement consistency and data verification protocols.
Sources · Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Expanding housing supply through accelerated UGB expansions trades off against potential environmental and infrastructure risks by lowering eligibility thresholds and increasing allowable acreage. Upsides include faster affordable housing production and reduced administrative delays for qualifying cities. Downsides include heightened pressure on regional ecosystems, utility networks, and the risk of prioritization metrics being gamed to bypass resource land protections.
Accelerated residential land supply reduces development timelines and housing shortages in qualifying municipalities.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Streamlined eligibility and public notice requirements lower administrative barriers while maintaining transparency.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Lowered affordability thresholds and expanded acreage caps may strain municipal infrastructure and utility networks before they can be upgraded.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Reliance on ACS data and prioritization metrics introduces complexity that could delay applications or create inconsistent eligibility determinations across jurisdictions.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
high confidence. Analysis is grounded exclusively in the supplied proposed amendment text and official legislative summaries. Fiscal impacts are explicitly documented as minimal/no impact by state revenue offices. No enacted status or unverified claims are included.
42 records currently loaded
Records available in the current snapshot.
Earliest loaded signal
Introduced bill text posted
Posted Jan 28, 2026, 3:25 PM PST
Follow the official text for HB 4035 and every amendment branch. Connections come from each amendment's stated base. Horizontal position shows when each document was first posted, when available. Dotted links flag likely related proposals based on their text.
Click a card to isolate its connected lines; use View summary to jump to its details. Horizontal position shows first posting time in Pacific Time. Drag or use the arrow keys to pan. Pinch with two fingers on mobile, or zoom with the controls, +/− keys, or Control/Command + scroll; press 0 to reset. Dashed branches remained proposals. Dotted teal links are text-based early signals, not official amendment relationships.
Selected document summary
Substantial replacement
What the document says to change
delete lines 1 through 22 and insert:
Inferred policy relationships
Related proposal · Amendment -3
Medium confidence from shared inserted text: ORS 195.020, ORS 197, ORS 197.015, ORS 197.626, ORS 197.652.
This is a text-based early signal, not an official statement that one amendment changes the other.
Official records (1)
Oregon records no individual sponsors.
Presession filing record
Introduced and printed pursuant to House Rule 12.00. Presession filed.
LC 205 became HB 4035
Mapping document posted: January 7, 2026 at 1:18 PM PST
Informational Meeting — <b>SB 1537 Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) Workgroup: Recommendations (LC 205)</b> Corie Harlan, Cities & Towns Program Director, Central Oregon Land Watch Mary Kyle McCurdy, Associate Director & Managing Attorney, 1000 Friends Samantha Bayer, General Counsel, Oregon Property Owners Association Alexandra Ring, Lobbyist, League of Oregon Cities
House Interim Committee on Housing and Homelessness introduction work session
Committee meeting: January 14, 2026 at 2:30 PM PST
HR 30
Committee introduction motion
Committee meeting: January 14, 2026 at 2:30 PM PST
A motion was made to adopt the listed legislative concepts as committee bills.
Official vote: 12-0-1
Committee introduction allows consideration; it does not imply every member supported the introduced or final text.
House carrier
Representative Pam Marsh
Third Reading Of House Bills · Version A
Senate carrier
Senator Khanh Pham
Third Reading Of House Measures · Version B
House carrier
Representative Pam Marsh
Possible Consideration Of Senate Amendments · Version B
A carrier presents the measure or report but is not necessarily its sponsor or author.
Records already listed in Activity are not repeated here.
42 events
Full timeline
42 entries shown.
Chapter 31, (2026 Laws): Effective date March 31, 2026.
Governor signed.
President signed.
Speaker signed.
House concurred in Senate amendments and repassed bill.
Ayes, 56; Excused, 3--Hartman, Levy B, Valderrama; Excused for Business of the House, 1--Wallan.
Vote explanation(s) filed by Sollman.
Third reading. Carried by Pham. Passed.
Ayes, 26; Nays, 3--Neron Misslin, Prozanski, Sollman; Excused, 1--Girod.
Carried over to 03-02 by unanimous consent.
Second reading.
Senate Amendments to A-Engrossed bill text posted
Recommendation: Do pass with amendments to the A-Eng. bill. (Printed B-Eng.)
Public Hearing and Work Session held.
Public Hearing and Work Session
Heard and Reported Out with Amendments · Agenda item 2 · Room HR E · Expands eligibility for cities and Metro to amend their urban growth boundaries under a temporary program.
IS_Impact HB 4035 A4
Revenue Impact Statement
Amendment -A4 adopted
IS_Impact HB 4035 A
Revenue Impact Statement
Referred to Housing and Development.
First reading. Referred to President's desk.
Third reading. Carried by Marsh. Passed.
Ayes, 40; Nays, 1--Walters; Excused, 12--Boice, Bunch, Diehl, Edwards, Hartman, Levy B, Lewis, Osborne, Reschke, Smith G, Valderrama, Wright; Excused for Business of the House, 7--Boshart Davis, Harbick, McIntire, Owens, Scharf, Skarlatos, Wallan.
Second reading.
House Amendments to Introduced bill text posted
Recommendation: Do pass with amendments and be printed A-Engrossed.
Work Session held.
Work Session
Heard and Reported Out with Amendments · Agenda item 2 · Room HR 40 · CARRIED OVER FROM THE 2/10/2026 MEETING: Expands eligibility for cities and Metro to amend their urban growth boundaries under a temporary program.
IS_Impact HB 4035 3
Revenue Impact Statement
Amendment -3 adopted
Possible Work Session
Not Heard · Agenda item 7 · Room HR 40 · Expands eligibility for cities and Metro to amend their urban growth boundaries under a temporary program.
Amendment -1 proposed
Public Hearing held.
Public Hearing
Heard · Agenda item 2 · Room HR 40 · Expands eligibility for cities and Metro to amend their urban growth boundaries under a temporary program.
Referred to Housing and Homelessness.
First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
age 3 of the printed A-engrossed bill, after line 5, insert: 2 “SECTION 2a. If House Bill 4035 becomes law, section 2 of this 2026 Act 3 is amended to read: 4 “ Sec. 2. (1)
ge 3 of the printed A-engrossed bill, after line 5, insert: 2 “ SECTION 2a. If House Bill 4035 becomes law, section 2 of this 2026 Act is amended to read: 3 “ Sec. 2. (1) As
E SUMMARY EFFECT OF AMENDMENT: The amendment resolves potential conflicts with House Bill 4035 B (2026) by changing the term “net residential acres” to “net buildable acres.”
residential acres” to “net buildable acres.” It is contingent on the passage of HB 4035 B (2026). BACKGROUND: Oregon’s UGB system is intended to manage urban expansion
bricated structures.”. 33 On page 4, after line 10, insert: 34 “ SECTION 4a. If House Bill 4035 becomes law, section 4 of this 2026 Act (amending sec- 35 tion 60, chapter 110,
y years for manufactured dwellings or prefabricated structures. SECTION 2a. If House Bill 4035 becomes law, section 2 of this 2026 Act is amended to read: Sec. 2. (1) As use
A-Eng. HB 4082 Page 3 1 On page 4, after line 10, insert: 2 “SECTION 4a. If House Bill 4035 becomes law, section 4 of this 2026 3 Act (amending section 60, chapter 110, O
hapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 12, chapter ___, 37 Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is amended to read: 38 “ Sec. 60. (1) Section 49, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 20
hapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 12, chapter ___, Oregon 6 Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is amended to read: 7 “ Sec. 60. (1) Section 49, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 20
5, and section 1 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled 40 House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 41 “(2) Section 50, chapter 110, Oregon Laws
Laws 2025, and section 1 [of this 2026 Act], 9 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on 10 January 2, 2033. 11 “(2) Section 50, chapter 110, Oregon La
, as amended by section 2 [of this 2026 Act], 42 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 43 “(3) Section 51, chapter 110, Oregon Laws
, as amended by section 3 [of this 2026 Act], 44 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 45 “(4) Section 52, chapter 110, Oregon Laws
Laws 2025, and section 4 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, 19 Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 20 2033. 21 “(5) Section 53, chapter 110, Oregon La
, as amended by section 5 [of this 2026 Act], 4 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 5 “(6) Section 54, chapter 110, Oregon Laws
years for manufactured dwellings or prefabricated structures. 8 SECTION 2a. If House Bill 4035 becomes law, section 2 of this 2026 Act is amended to read: 9 Sec. 2. (1) As u
, as amended by section 6 [of this 2026 Act], 6 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 7 “(7) Section 55, chapter 110, Oregon Laws
Laws 2025, and section 7 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, 29 Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 30 2033. HB 4082-A4 2/25/26 Proposed Amendments to
, as amended by section 8 [of this 2026 Act], 11 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 12 “(9) Section 57, chapter 110, Oregon Laws
, as amended by section 9 [of this 2026 Act], 19 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 20 “(13) Section 11 [of this 2026 Act], chapt
2, 2033. 20 “(13) Section 11 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), 21 is repealed on January 2, 2033. 22 “ (14) Section 2 of this 2026 Act, as a
13) Section 11 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (En- 15 rolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 16 “ (14) Section 2 of this 2026 Act, as amen
(8) Section 2 of this 2026 Act is repealed on January 2, 2033. SECTION 4a. If House Bill 4035 becomes law, section 4 of this 2026 Act (amending section 60, chapter 110, Oreg
, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 12, chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is amended to read: Sec. 60. (1) Section 49, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024,
gon Laws 2025, and section 1 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (2) Section 50, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
024, as amended by section 2 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (3) Section 51, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
024, as amended by section 3 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (4) Section 52, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
gon Laws 2025, and section 4 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (5) Section 53, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
024, as amended by section 5 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (6) Section 54, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
024, as amended by section 6 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (7) Section 55, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
8) Section 2 of this 2026 Act is repealed on January 2, 2033. 34 SECTION 4a. If House Bill 4035 becomes law, section 4 of this 2026 Act (amending section 35 60, chapter 110, O
gon Laws 2025, and section 7 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (8) Section 56, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
024, as amended by section 8 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (9) Section 57, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
hapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 12, chapter ___, Oregon 37 Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is amended to read: 38 Sec. 60. (1) Section 49, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024
5, and section 1 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled 40 House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 41 (2) Section 50, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2
, as amended by section 2 [of this 2026 Act], 42 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 43 (3) Section 51, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2
025, as amended by section 9 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (13) Section 11 [of this 2026 Act], chapter
, as amended by section 3 [of this 2026 Act], 44 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 45 (4) Section 52, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2
ry 2, 2033. (13) Section 11 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (14) Section 2 of this 2026 Act, as amended
, as amended by section 5 [of this 2026 Act], 4 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 5 (6) Section 54, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2
, as amended by section 6 [of this 2026 Act], 6 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 7 (7) Section 55, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2
, as amended by section 8 [of this 2026 Act], 11 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 12 (9) Section 57, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2
, as amended by section 9 [of this 2026 Act], 19 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 20 (13) Section 11 [of this 2026 Act], chapte
2, 2033. 20 (13) Section 11 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), 21 is repealed on January 2, 2033. 22 (14) Section 2 of this 2026 Act, as ame
9, 50, 51, 52, 53, 55, 56”. 2 In line 3, after “2024” insert “, and section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025; and declaring an 3 emergency”. 4 Delete lines 5 through 28 and delete page 2
, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56 and 60, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, and section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025; and declaring an emergency. Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oreg
50, 51, 52, 53, 55, 56 and 60, chapter 3 110, Oregon Laws 2024, and section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025; and declaring an emer- 4 gency. 5 Be It Enacted by the People of the State o
51, 52, 53, 3 54, 55, 56 and 60, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, and section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025; 4 and declaring an emergency. 5 Be It Enacted by the People of the State of
, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 3 [of this 2025 Act], 17 chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on 18 January 2, 203
TION 12. Section 60, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended 15 by section 4, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 16 “ Sec. 60. (1) [Sections] Section 49 [to 56, 58 and 59]
0, 20 Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 21 [(3)] (8) Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, [of this 2025 Act] is repealed on January 22 2, 2033. 23 SECTION 4. ORS 197.04
CTION 5. Section 60, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by 27 section 4, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 28 “ Sec. 60. (1) Section 49, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 3 [of this 2025 36 Act], chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed 37 on January 2, 203
chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by sec- 6 tion 3 [of this 2025 Act], chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, 7 chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 203
10, Oregon Laws 2024, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 41 “[(3)] (12) Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, as amended by section 9 of this 2026 42 Act, [of this 2025 Act] is repealed on
regon Laws 2024, is repealed on Jan- 12 uary 2, 2033. 13 “[(3)] (12) Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, as amended by 14 section 9 of this 2026 Act, [of this 2025 Act] is repealed on
chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by sec- 13 tion 3 [of this 2025 Act], chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, 14 chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 203
530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 17 “[(3)] (9) Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, [of this 2025 Act] 18 is repealed on January 2, 2033.”. 19 In line 23, delete
This section does not apply to a city within Metro. 19 “ SECTION 8. Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 20 “ Sec. 2. (1) In lieu of amending its urban growth boun
) This section does not apply to a city within Metro. 26 “SECTION 8. Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to 27 read: 28 “ Sec. 2. (1) In lieu of amending its urban growth b
2) This section does not apply to a city within Metro. 28 SECTION 8. Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 29 Sec. 2. (1) In lieu of amending its urban growth bounda
(2) This section does not apply to a city within Metro. SECTION 9. Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 2. (1) In lieu of amending its urban growth boundary
CTION 9. Section 60, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by 3 section 4, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 4 “ Sec. 60. (1) Section 49, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 3 [of this 2025 26 Act], chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed 27 on January 2, 203
29 Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 30 “[(3)] (11) Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, as amended by section 8 of this 2026 31 Act, [of this 2025 Act] is repealed on
2) This section does not apply to a city within Metro. 25 SECTION 9. Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 26 Sec. 2. (1) In lieu of amending its urban growth bounda
chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by sec- 24 tion 3 [of this 2025 Act], chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, 25 chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 203
, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 3 [of this 2025 Act], 35 chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on 36 January 2, 203
Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 28 2033. 29 “[(3)] (11) Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, as amended by 30 section 8 of this 2026 Act, [of this 2025 Act] is repealed on
, 38 Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 39 [(3)] (11) Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, as amended by section 8 of this 2026 40 Act, [of this 2025 Act] is repealed on
SECTION 12. Section 60, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 4, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 60. (1) [Sections] Section 49 [to 56, 58 and 59], ch
57, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 3 [of this 2025 Act], chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033.
r 110, Oregon Laws 2024, is repealed on January 2, 2033. [(3)] (12) Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, as amended by section 9 of this 2026 Act, [of this 2025 Act] is repealed on Ja
, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 3 [of this 2025 Act], 36 chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on 37 January 2, 203
110, Oregon Laws 2024, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 41 [(3)] (12) Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, as amended by section 9 of this 2026 42 Act, [of this 2025 Act] is repealed on
CTION 1. Section 49, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by 6 section 4, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 7 “ Sec. 49. As used in sections 49 to 59, chapter 110, O
CTION 1. Section 49, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by 8 section 4, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 9 “ Sec. 49. As used in sections 49 to 59, chapter 110, O
SECTION 1. Section 49, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 4, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 49. As used in sections 49 to 59, chapter 110, Orego
CTION 3. Section 52, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by 17 section 5, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 18 “ Sec. 52. A city may not add, or petition to add, a si
SECTION 4. Section 52, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 5, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 52. A city may not add, or petition to add, a site u
CTION 4. Section 52, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by 2 section 5, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 3 “ Sec. 52. A city may not add, or petition to add, a si
6, 58 and 59], chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, [are] as 19 amended by section 4, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 1 of this 2026 Act, is re- 20 pealed on January 2, 2033. 21 “ (2)
section 3 [of this 2025 Act], 17 chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on 18 January 2, 2033. 19 (7) Section 58, chapter 110, Oregon Laws
6, 58 and 59], chapter 110, Oregon 17 Laws 2024, [are] as amended by section 4, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, 18 and section 1 of this 2026 Act, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 19 “ (2) Se
3 “(4) Section 52, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by sec- 24 tion 5, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 4 of this 2026 Act, 25 is repealed on January 2, 2033. 26 “(5) Sec
60. (1) Section 49, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended 29 by section 4, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 1 of this 2026 30 Act, is repealed on January 2, 2033. HB 4035-1
c- HB 4035-A4 2/23/26 Proposed Amendments to A-Eng. HB 4035 Page 5 1 tion 6, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7 of this 2026 Act, 2 is repealed on January 2, 2033. 3 “(8) Sec
section 3 [of this 2025 36 Act], chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed 37 on January 2, 2033. 38 “ (10) Section 58, chapter 110, Oregon L
“ (4) Section 52, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by sec- 6 tion 5, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 3 of this 2026 Act, 7 is repealed on January 2, 2033. 8 “(5) Sec
6 tion 3 [of this 2025 Act], chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, 7 chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 8 “(10) Section 58, chapter 110, Oregon Laws
8 “(10) Section 58, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by 9 section 8, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 10 2033. 11 “(11) Section 59, chapter 110, Oregon La
0 “(6) Section 55, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by sec- 11 tion 6, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 12 “[(2)] (7) Section 57, chapter 110, Oregon
13 tion 3 [of this 2025 Act], chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, 14 chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 15 “ (8) Section 58, chapter 110, Oregon Laws
“ (8) Section 58, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by sec- 16 tion 8, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 17 “[(3)] (9) Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon L
CTION 6. Section 55, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by 12 section 6, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 13 “ Sec. 55. (1) As used in this section: 14 “(a) ‘Afford
SECTION 7. Section 55, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 6, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 55. (1) As used in this section: (a) “Affordable un
60. (1) Section 49, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended 5 by section 4, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 1 of this 2026 6 Act, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 7 “(2) Sec
1 “(4) Section 52, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by sec- 12 tion 5, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 4 of this 2026 Act, 13 is repealed on January 2, 2033. 14 “(5) Sec
section 3 [of this 2025 26 Act], chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed 27 on January 2, 2033. 28 “ (10) Section 58, chapter 110, Oregon L
“ (7) Section 55, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by sec- 19 tion 6, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 6 of this 2026 Act, 20 is repealed on January 2, 2033. 21 “(8) Sec
24 tion 3 [of this 2025 Act], chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, 25 chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 26 “ (10) Section 58, chapter 110, Oregon Laws
6 “ (10) Section 58, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by 27 section 8, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 28 2033. 29 “[(3)] (11) Section 2, chapter 341, Oreg
section 3 [of this 2025 Act], 35 chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on 36 January 2, 2033. 37 (10) Section 58, chapter 110, Oregon Law
o 56, 58 and 59], chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, [are] as amended by section 4, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 1 of this 2026 Act, is re- pealed on January 2, 2033. (2) Section
2033. (4) Section 52, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 5, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 4 of this 2026 Act, is repealed on January 2, 2033. (5) Section 5
2033. (7) Section 55, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 6, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7 of this 2026 Act, is repealed on January 2, 2033. (8) Section 5
by section 3 [of this 2025 Act], chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. (10) Section 58, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
2033. (10) Section 58, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 8, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. (11) Section 59, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
6, 58 and 59], chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, [are] as 19 amended by section 4, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 1 of this 2026 Act, is re- 20 pealed on January 2, 2033. 21 (2) Se
section 3 [of this 2025 Act], 36 chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on 37 January 2, 2033. 38 (10) Section 58, chapter 110, Oregon Law
d to their urban growth boundaries (UGBs) under the one-time process created by Senate Bill 1537 (2024). It creates certain exceptions within the process for the City of Woodbu
add land to their urban growth boundaries (UGBs) under the one-time process in Senate Bill 1537 (2024). The measure broadens the eligibility criteria for demonstrating housing
D: Workgroup recommendations Density requirements for new sites added under SB 1537 (2024) Total acreage and allowances for complete communities EFFECT OF AMENDM
the measure effective on passage. BACKGROUND: In 2024, the legislature enacted SB 1537, which established a one-time, temporary UGB expansion tool for qualifying citi
issue grants, in addition to contracts. ISSUES DISCUSSED: History and use of Senate Bill 1537 (2024) Workgroup and bill development Woodburn’s housing supply and buildab
its UGB through an abbreviated process compared to a traditional UGB expansion. SB 1537 requires that, within prior UGB expansion areas, at least 75 percent of the lan
adopted public facilities plan with an associated financing plan. In addition, SB 1537 requires that a city demonstrate it has a greater percentage of severely cost-b
d by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Land added under the SB 1537 process must meet specific site eligibility criteria. A “site” may consist of o
or more contiguous properties that together satisfy the statutory requirements. SB 1537 also imposes mandatory affordability requirements on development within the exp
net residential acreage, and requires that certain standards be included in the SB 1537 (2024) process, such as density, greenspace, transportation, housing affordabil
ese provisions on January 2, 2033. BACKGROUND: In 2024, the legislature enacted SB 1537, which established a one-time, temporary UGB expansion tool for qualifying citi
adopted public facilities plan with an associated financing plan. In addition, SB 1537 requires that a city demonstrate it has a greater percentage of severely cost-b
d by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Land added under the SB 1537 process must meet specific site eligibility criteria and mandatory affordabilit
“Chapter 31, (2026 Laws): Effective date March 31, 2026.”
Confirm with the official record.
Supplemental, source-linked analysis from project researchers and community contributors. It is separate from Oregon's official record.