HB 4093
Plain-language analysis
Generated analysis, not an official summary or legal advice. Confirm with linked Oregon documents.
The measure amends Oregon disability employment and services law to require employers to explicitly link physical job requirements to essential functions in postings, guarantee employees the right to bring a support person to reasonable accommodation discussions under confidentiality conditions, extend anti-discrimination protections to local government services, and direct BOLI to produce compliance guidance. Material consequences include new employer posting compliance duties, formalized interactive-process participation rules, expanded local government liability for disability discrimination, and an estimated $180,279 in ongoing state costs plus one additional BOLI investigator position.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: House Amendments to Introduced; Fiscal Impact Statement A; Staff Measure Summary A
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The amendment likely aims to close ambiguity in how employers justify physical job requirements and to formalize third-party participation in accommodation processes, which may have previously been handled inconsistently. Basis inference drawn from the removal of 'to screen out individuals with disabilities' language (broadening the prohibition) and the explicit statutory codification of support person rights and confidentiality conditions.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: House Amendments to Introduced; Staff Measure Summary A
Must revise job postings to explicitly connect physical requirements to essential functions and accommodate support persons in accommodation meetings.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: House Amendments to Introduced; Staff Measure Summary A
Subject to new non-discrimination mandates for all services, programs, and activities under ORS 659A.142; must adjust hiring practices and service delivery standards.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: House Amendments to Introduced; Fiscal Impact Statement A
Gain statutory right to a support person during accommodation discussions and clearer transparency regarding physical job requirements.
Basis: Inferred · Source: House Amendments to Introduced
Responsible for developing guidance materials, managing increased inquiries/investigations, and funding additional staff.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Employers must conduct functional analyses to justify physical requirements in postings, increasing pre-hiring administrative steps.
Basis: Inferred · Source: House Amendments to Introduced
The interactive process is formalized; employers may require written confidentiality acknowledgments from support persons, adding procedural steps but clarifying boundaries.
Basis: Inferred · Source: House Amendments to Introduced
BOLI will face an estimated 150 additional annual inquiries and 50 investigations, requiring dedicated staff to maintain enforcement capacity.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Local governments must audit service accessibility and hiring criteria, with indeterminate compliance costs for counsel and administrative adjustments.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Qualified applicant with a disability
Successfully challenges a blanket physical requirement in a job posting because the employer cannot demonstrate its direct link to essential functions, resulting in policy reform that opens previously inaccessible roles to disabled workers.
Basis: Inferred · Source: House Amendments to Introduced
Small employer
Lists a standard physical requirement without detailed functional documentation, triggering a BOLI investigation and penalty despite no discriminatory intent, due to strict compliance expectations on posting format.
Basis: Inferred · Source: House Amendments to Introduced
The text legally permits employers to deny support person requests if the individual disrupts the discussion or refuses confidentiality agreements, and to require written acknowledgments. A potential unlawful outcome could arise if employers routinely invoke 'disruption' or confidentiality demands to effectively block support persons, or use loosely defined physical requirements to indirectly exclude disabled applicants, exploiting weak enforcement or misclassification of essential functions.
Sources · House Amendments to Introduced
Expands procedural transparency and third-party participation in disability accommodations while increasing employer compliance burdens and state administrative costs. Upsides include clearer job posting standards, reduced ambiguity in interactive processes, and extended anti-discrimination coverage for local government services. Downsides involve potential litigation over 'essential function' linkages, increased BOLI caseloads, and indeterminate compliance costs for local governments.
Clearer job posting standards reduce ambiguity in interactive processes.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Staff Measure Summary A
Extended anti-discrimination coverage for local government services improves access.
Basis: Inferred · Source: House Amendments to Introduced
Potential litigation over 'essential function' linkages increases legal exposure.
Basis: Inferred · Source: House Amendments to Introduced
Increased BOLI caseloads and indeterminate compliance costs for local governments strain resources.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
The amendment removes the phrase 'to screen out individuals with disabilities' from the physical requirements prohibition, broadening its scope. It replaces prior support person language with explicit statutory conditions: employers cannot deny requests for a support person in accommodation discussions if the person does not disrupt the meeting and agrees to confidentiality (including written acknowledgment if required). It also formally extends ORS 659A.142 non-discrimination protections to local governments.
Removed 'to screen out individuals with disabilities' from physical requirement prohibition.
Broadens employer obligation to justify physical requirements without limiting the rule to discriminatory screening intent.
Sources · House Amendments to Introduced
Codified support person rights with explicit disruption and confidentiality conditions.
Formalizes third-party participation in the interactive process while giving employers clear boundaries for denial or documentation.
Sources · House Amendments to Introduced
Extended ORS 659A.142 anti-discrimination mandate to local governments.
Expands statutory coverage beyond state entities to cities, counties, school districts, and special districts for services, programs, and activities.
Sources · House Amendments to Introduced
Tradeoff: The amendment shifts from a narrower, intent-focused physical requirement rule to a broader compliance standard, while formalizing support person participation with clear procedural boundaries. This increases employer transparency obligations and local government liability but reduces ambiguity in accommodation processes.
high confidence. Analysis is grounded exclusively in the provided House Amendments text, official fiscal impact statements, and staff measure summaries. No external speculation or legislative intent assumptions are included.
Possible effects if adopted; not current bill text.
If adopted, the amendment broadens Oregon’s disability employment protections by removing a limiting clause from the rule against using unconnected physical requirements in job postings, and it expands an employee’s right to bring a support person into reasonable accommodation meetings while adding employer authority to mandate confidentiality agreements for that person. It also formally extends existing state disability discrimination prohibitions to local governments, requiring BOLI to produce compliance guidance and handle increased enforcement volume.
Basis: Stakeholder claim · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Fiscal Impact Statement A; Staff Measure Summary A
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The removal of the phrase "to screen out individuals with disabilities" from the physical requirements prohibition suggests an intent to close a potential loophole where employers might argue that physically demanding job postings are lawful even if they inadvertently or systematically exclude disabled applicants, thereby shifting the focus to whether the requirements are genuinely tied to essential job functions rather than their discriminatory effect.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
Must ensure job postings explicitly link physical requirements to essential functions, cannot deny support persons in accommodation meetings (subject to non-disruption/confidentiality conditions), and must comply with disability nondiscrimination rules for local government roles.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Fiscal Impact Statement A
Gain clearer pathways to request accommodations, bring a support person to discussions, and face potentially fewer barriers from overly broad physical job requirements.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
Subject to explicit state nondiscrimination mandates in services/programs/activities; must audit job postings for compliance.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Fiscal Impact Statement A
Must produce guidance materials and handle increased inquiry/investigation volume regarding accommodation support persons and physical requirement disclosures.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Employers will need to revise hiring practices, update job posting templates, and draft or adopt confidentiality acknowledgment forms for support persons. Employees may experience more structured but potentially longer accommodation discussions due to third-party involvement.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
BOLI faces measurable staffing costs (~0.75 FTE) and must develop compliance guidance. Local governments face indeterminate administrative costs to adjust postings and ensure program accessibility.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
The amendment shifts enforcement focus toward proactive job posting compliance and structured accommodation dialogues, potentially increasing the volume of BOLI inquiries and investigations related to disability accommodations.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Fiscal Impact Statement A; Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Disabled job applicants
An applicant with a mobility impairment applies for a warehouse role. The employer’s job posting lists "must lift 50 lbs" without justification. Under the amendment, this is automatically unlawful regardless of intent, forcing the employer to either prove the requirement is essential or remove it, dramatically increasing hiring access for disabled workers.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
Employees with chronic health conditions
An employee requests a support person (e.g., a family member) to an accommodation meeting. The employer mandates a strict confidentiality agreement that inadvertently restricts the support person from discussing necessary care logistics with their own healthcare provider, creating a conflict of duty and potentially delaying or derailing the accommodation process.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
The statutory language grants employers conditional authority to mandate confidentiality agreements. If employers draft these agreements to exceed state/federal privacy law limits or use them as a pretext to filter out legitimate accommodation requests, it could violate existing disability nondiscrimination statutes without triggering immediate enforcement action.
Sources · Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
The measure strengthens disability access and transparency in hiring but shifts administrative and legal compliance costs onto employers and local governments while introducing new confidentiality obligations that could complicate accommodation discussions.
Clearer job posting standards
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Expanded support for employees during accommodations
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Explicit local government accountability
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Increased employer drafting/compliance burdens
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potential for confidentiality agreements to chill open dialogue
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Measurable state enforcement costs
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
high confidence. Analysis is grounded in the explicit amendment text, official fiscal/staff summaries, and current bill context. No enacted status or external litigation assumptions are applied.
If adopted, the amendment eliminates the requirement that job postings explicitly connect physical requirements to essential functions only when used to screen out disabled individuals, making any unlinked physical requirement in a posting unlawful. It also replaces the narrow statutory definition of an accompanying "authorized representative" with a broader allowance for a "support person" during reasonable accommodation discussions, conditioned on non-disruption and advance confidentiality agreements. Material consequences include expanded accessibility for workers with disabilities, increased employer compliance burdens for job posting audits, and additional BOLI enforcement capacity to handle anticipated inquiry growth.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The amendment aims to lower evidentiary barriers for disability discrimination claims and expand informal support during accommodation processes by removing intent language from physical requirement standards and broadening who may accompany an employee.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
Gain broader access to a support person during accommodation meetings and face clearer job posting standards that must explicitly tie physical requirements to essential functions.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
Must audit and revise job postings, permit support persons under new conditions, and manage potential BOLI enforcement actions.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Fiscal Impact Statement A; Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Faces increased caseloads and is tasked with developing compliance guidance.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Employers will need to adjust job posting language to explicitly link physical requirements to essential functions, increasing HR compliance costs. Employees can bring a support person to accommodation meetings without the attendee meeting strict statutory definitions, provided they sign confidentiality agreements if requested and do not disrupt discussions. BOLI anticipates approximately 150 additional annual inquiries and 50 investigations, requiring new staff allocation. Local governments face indeterminate costs for posting adjustments and policy updates.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Fiscal Impact Statement A; Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
Employee with severe mental health condition
Brings a trained support person who successfully facilitates a complex accommodation negotiation, securing necessary workplace modifications that prevent termination and preserve long-term employment.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Small employer
Lists a physical requirement in a job posting that is genuinely essential but fails to explicitly state the connection in the text; under the amended standard, this triggers automatic liability or costly BOLI enforcement despite business necessity, forcing operational changes or withdrawal of the posting.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Distinguishes statutory permission from enforcement failure or duty creep.
Sources · Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Broadening disability accommodations and clarifying job posting standards improves accessibility but increases employer compliance costs and administrative friction during sensitive discussions. Upsides include reduced evidentiary barriers for discrimination claims and stronger informal support for workers. Downsides involve higher BOLI caseloads, potential meeting disruptions, and indeterminate local government adjustment costs.
Reduced evidentiary barriers for disability discrimination claims
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Stronger informal support for workers during accommodation processes
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Higher BOLI caseloads and staffing costs
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
Potential meeting disruptions and confidentiality risks
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Indeterminate local government adjustment costs
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
high confidence. Analysis is grounded in the explicit amendment text, official fiscal impact statements, and staff summaries. No enacted status or prior version comparison is claimed.
18 records currently loaded
Records available in the current snapshot.
Earliest loaded signal
Introduced bill text posted
Posted Jan 28, 2026, 3:25 PM PST
Follow the official text for HB 4093 and every amendment branch. Connections come from each amendment's stated base. Horizontal position shows when each document was first posted, when available.
Click a card to isolate its connected lines; use View summary to jump to its details. Horizontal position shows first posting time in Pacific Time. Drag or use the arrow keys to pan. Pinch with two fingers on mobile, or zoom with the controls, +/− keys, or Control/Command + scroll; press 0 to reset. Dashed branches remained proposals.
Selected document summary
Substantial replacement
What the document says to change
delete lines 25 through 27 and insert:
No deeper official pre-number history was found.
Chief sponsors: Representative Travis Nelson, Senator Sara Gelser Blouin, Senator James Manning Jr., Representative Farrah Chaichi, Representative Willy Chotzen, Representative Lesly Muñoz, Representative Sue Rieke Smith, Representative Lamar Wise, Senator Lew Frederick, Senator Chris Gorsek
Regular sponsors: Representative Shannon Isadore, Representative Sarah McDonald, Representative Jules Walters, Senator Deb Patterson, Representative Tom Andersen
Records already listed in Activity are not repeated here.
Official origin records are incomplete; missing facts are not inferred.
Yex Labs LLC should monitor this measure because the supplied artifact supports workforce development and AI skills training and a plausible but not yet specific effect.
68% confidence · deterministic fallback
18 events
Full timeline
18 entries shown.
In committee upon adjournment.
House Amendments to Introduced bill text posted
Referred to Ways and Means by prior reference.
Recommendation: Do pass with amendments, be printed A-Engrossed, and be referred to Ways and Means by prior reference.
Work Session held.
Work Session
Heard and Reported Out with Amendments · Agenda item 4 · Room HR 60 · Directs the Bureau of Labor and Industries to create certain guidance and informational materials to assist employers and employees.
IS_Impact HB 4093 1
Revenue Impact Statement
Amendment -1 adopted
Public Hearing scheduled.
Public Hearing
Agenda item 5 · Room HR 60 · Directs the Bureau of Labor and Industries to create certain guidance and informational materials to assist employers and employees.
Amendment -1 proposed
Referred to Labor and Workforce Development with subsequent referral to Ways and Means.
First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
“Directs the Bureau of Labor and Industries to create certain guidance and informational materials to assist employers and employees.”
Confirm with the official record.
Supplemental, source-linked analysis from project researchers and community contributors. It is separate from Oregon's official record.