HB 4082
Plain-language analysis
Generated analysis, not an official summary or legal advice. Confirm with linked Oregon documents.
HB 4082 establishes a streamlined, time-limited pathway for cities and Metro to expand urban growth boundaries specifically for housing for older persons and manufactured dwelling parks, bypassing standard housing-need demonstrations while mandating long-term affordability covenants, senior-designation restrictions, and accessibility standards. Material consequences include accelerated development timelines for targeted housing types, reduced regulatory friction for local governments, permanent rezoning locks on added lands until 2033, and shifted enforcement responsibilities to municipalities.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The text structurally reduces regulatory barriers (e.g., waiving need-demonstration requirements and density mandates) while imposing targeted affordability and accessibility mandates, suggesting a legislative hypothesis that streamlining land-use approvals will accelerate the supply of age-designated and manufactured housing without compromising long-term affordability goals.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
Gain expedited UGB expansion authority without proving housing need, but assume obligations to draft conceptual plans, enforce affordability covenants, manage strict review timelines, and bear ongoing enforcement responsibility for covenant violations.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Gain access to faster approvals, density allowances, and exemptions from standard planning requirements for qualifying projects, but must secure long-term affordability restrictions and accessibility compliance.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
May gain increased access to age-designated and accessible housing units priced below market rate, but face reduced future zoning flexibility if land use restrictions persist.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Receive additional submittals for review under the amended section 57 process, with judicial review rights strictly limited to cities or site owners.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Cities must adopt conceptual plans that meet specific exemptions and affordability mandates, while Metro faces a strict 120-day compliance review window without hearing requirements. Developers must implement affordability covenants per ORS 456.270-456.295 for at least 30 years and ensure Type B accessibility standards for ≥80% of units. Municipalities bear ongoing enforcement responsibility for covenant violations and financial penalties, creating potential capacity strain. The measure carries minimal direct fiscal impact on state or local governments per official revenue and fiscal statements.
Basis: Bill text · Sources: Enrolled; Fiscal Impact Statement B; Revenue Impact Statement B
City with constrained UGB capacity and severe senior housing shortage
Successfully petitions under this section, adding 100 acres of high-density, accessible senior housing and manufactured parks within months, rapidly alleviating a critical shortage of affordable age-restricted units without triggering traditional environmental or need-demonstration delays.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Developer exploiting density exemptions and weak municipal oversight
Circumvents the 80% affordability mandate by misclassifying structures or relying on low financial penalties, effectively converting restricted land into unaffordable market-rate housing while locking it from future affordable rezoning for two decades.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
The text legally permits streamlined approvals for designated housing types. A potentially unlawful outcome could arise if local governments or developers misclassify non-senior market-rate housing as qualifying under the federal definition incorporated by reference, or if financial penalties for covenant violations are set too low to deter noncompliance, allowing de facto conversion of restricted land while technically remaining within the letter of the law.
Sources · Enrolled
Accelerating senior and manufactured housing supply through regulatory exemptions trades long-term land-use flexibility and strict affordability enforcement for faster development and reduced municipal burden.
Permanent rezoning restrictions on added lands limit future municipal zoning flexibility until the 2033 sunset.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
Shifted enforcement responsibilities to municipalities may strain local capacity, and reduced oversight could undermine long-term affordability goals.
Basis: Bill text · Source: Enrolled
The enrolled text incorporates the Senate amendments that conditionally change 'net residential acres' to 'net buildable acres' if HB 4035 becomes law. The primary substantive provisions remain consistent with the A-engrossed version, finalizing acreage caps (100/50 net residential acres), affordability terms (80% of units at ≤120% AMI for ≥30 years), senior-designation mandates, accessibility standards, and the January 2, 2033 repeal schedule. No new policy thresholds or exemptions were introduced in the enrolled version.
No change to enforcement mechanisms or penalty structures; remains municipal responsibility with financial penalties for noncompliance.
neutral
Sources · Enrolled; Senate Amendments to A-Engrossed
Conditionally replaces 'net residential acres' with 'net buildable acres' contingent on HB 4035 passage.
moderate
Sources · Enrolled; Senate Amendments to A-Engrossed
No change to affected groups or core obligations; streamlined UGB pathway for senior/manufactured housing remains intact.
neutral
Sources · Enrolled; Senate Amendments to A-Engrossed
Tradeoff: Accelerating senior and manufactured housing supply through regulatory exemptions trades long-term land-use flexibility and strict affordability enforcement for faster development and reduced municipal burden.
high confidence. Analysis is grounded exclusively in the enrolled bill text and official legislative revenue/fiscal statements. No external speculation or unstated intent is included.
Possible effects if adopted; not current bill text.
The proposed amendment would create a contingent pathway for cities and Metro to expand urban growth boundaries specifically for housing for older persons and manufactured or prefabricated dwellings, bypassing traditional housing need demonstrations while imposing acreage caps, density allowances, long-term affordability restrictions, and rezoning moratoriums. If adopted, it would accelerate the development of targeted senior and manufactured housing but permanently alter land-use planning requirements until a 2033 repeal date.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary B
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The measure may aim to address demographic shifts toward an older population and reduce development costs by streamlining land-use approvals for manufactured housing, which typically costs less than traditional site-built homes. This hypothesis is derived from staff summaries noting discussions on demographic trends and the average cost differential between manufactured and site-built housing.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Staff Measure Summary B
Gain authority to petition for urban growth boundary expansions without proving housing need, but assume responsibility for reviewing conceptual plans, enforcing affordability covenants, and managing rezoning moratoriums.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Gain eligibility to add up to 100 or 50 net buildable acres depending on city population, with relaxed density and planning requirements for manufactured structures.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
May gain access to newly designated housing units subject to 30-year affordability restrictions at or below 120 percent of area median income.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Face potential permanent loss of protected land within urban growth boundary expansions, as the provision overrides standard comprehensive planning alignment requirements until repeal.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Cities must adopt conceptual plans, secure enforceable affordability covenants for 80 percent of non-manufactured units, and implement financial penalties for noncompliance. Metro must conduct a substantial compliance review within 120 days without holding hearings. The Legislative Revenue Office and Legislative Fiscal Office report no revenue impact or minimal fiscal impact on state and local expenditures. Eligibility is capped at 100 net buildable acres for cities over 25,000 population and 50 for smaller cities. Cities bear enforcement responsibility for restrictive covenants and accessibility standards, with the provision restricting rezoning for 20 to 30 years to limit future policy flexibility while locking in current land-use designations. While the measure incorporates federal definitions for senior housing and accessibility (e.g., 24 C.F.R. 100.306), the legal authority, enforcement mechanisms, and urban growth boundary expansion remain strictly under Oregon state jurisdiction.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment; Fiscal Impact Statement A; Fiscal Impact Statement B
Cities and Older Adults
A city with a severe senior housing shortage successfully petitions to add 100 net buildable acres in one cycle, rapidly deploying over 800 affordable units meeting Type B accessibility standards without enduring the typical multi-year comprehensive plan amendment process.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Rural Land and Future Housing Policy
A municipality exploits the provision by classifying standard market-rate subdivisions as manufactured dwelling parks, bypassing density limits and affordability mandates while using the 30-year rezoning moratorium to permanently lock in high-density, unrestricted development that evades future affordable housing requirements.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
The text legally permits targeted housing expansions but relies on municipal enforcement of long-term covenants and accessibility standards. Duty creep or misclassification could transform a streamlined approval process into a mechanism for circumventing comprehensive planning and affordability mandates.
Sources · Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
The measure trades comprehensive planning alignment and long-term regulatory oversight for accelerated senior and manufactured housing supply. Upsides include faster development timelines, reduced administrative burdens for qualifying cities, and targeted affordability guarantees. Downsides include permanent loss of rural land protections within the moratorium window, reduced density flexibility post-repeal, and potential enforcement gaps that could undermine affordability commitments.
Accelerated development timelines for senior and manufactured housing without traditional need-demonstration delays.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Reduced administrative burdens for qualifying cities and Metro through streamlined compliance reviews and hearing restrictions.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Targeted affordability guarantees locking in 80 percent of non-manufactured units at or below 120 percent of area median income for 30 years.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Permanent loss of rural and resource land protections within urban growth boundary expansions until the 2033 repeal date.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Reduced density flexibility post-repeal, as the provision establishes fixed acreage caps and moratoriums that may not align with future demographic or economic shifts.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
Potential enforcement gaps that could undermine affordability commitments if municipalities lack capacity to monitor covenants or collect financial penalties.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -A4 — proposed amendment
high confidence. The analysis is grounded in the official proposed amendment text and multiple legislative revenue, fiscal, and staff summaries. No enacted language or external litigation is referenced. All claims are bounded by the supplied documents.
Creates an expedited, hearing-free pathway for eligible Oregon cities and Metro to expand urban growth boundaries specifically for housing for older persons and manufactured or prefabricated structures, imposing explicit acreage caps, reducing affordability mandates to 80 percent of units for 30 years, relaxing density rules for prefab units, and requiring Type B accessibility standards.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The amendment likely seeks to accelerate senior and manufactured housing supply by lowering regulatory and financial barriers for developers while addressing demographic demand and constrained land costs within existing urban growth boundaries.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Staff Measure Summary A; Staff Measure Summary B
Gain a streamlined UGB expansion tool with explicit acreage caps (100 acres or 50 acres) and exemption from proving housing need, but must adopt conceptual plans meeting specific affordability and accessibility rules.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Benefit from relaxed density requirements, exemption from certain conceptual plan standards, and an expedited approval process without public hearings.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Gain access to new housing supply designated for them, with 80 percent of residential units required to meet Type B accessibility standards.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Affected by the reduced affordability covenant requirement (80 percent of non-manufactured units must remain affordable for 30 years), which decreases long-term affordable stock compared to the original 100 percent/60-year mandate.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Bear responsibility for monitoring senior-designation covenants, collecting financial penalties for noncompliance, and enforcing 20-to-30-year rezoning restrictions.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Cities must finalize conceptual plans that satisfy affordability, accessibility, and senior-designation thresholds before petitioning Metro. Developers face lower upfront regulatory costs but must secure 30-year affordability covenants and ensure construction meets Type B standards. Metro processes petitions within a fixed 120-day window without hearings, limiting public input but accelerating approvals. The explicit acreage caps and mandatory rezoning restrictions lock land use for decades, reducing future municipal flexibility while guaranteeing dedicated housing supply. The amendment incorporates the federal definition of “housing for older persons” from ORS 659A.421, but remains an Oregon-law change governing state urban growth boundaries and local covenant enforcement.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Qualifying cities and senior/low-income households
A qualifying city rapidly approves a 100-acre manufactured housing community using the expedited pathway, delivering hundreds of accessible, affordable units to older adults and low-income households within months while bypassing traditional multi-year UGB review timelines.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Low-income households and municipal land-use planning
A developer maximizes market-rate profit by exploiting density exemptions and reduced affordability mandates, while weak municipal enforcement allows senior-designation covenants to lapse or be legally circumvented, converting restricted land to general market housing before the 20-to-30-year rezoning restriction expires.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
inference
Sources · Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Accelerating senior and manufactured housing development through relaxed affordability mandates and streamlined approvals trades long-term affordable housing security and traditional land-use flexibility for faster supply delivery and lower regulatory costs. Upsides include expedited permitting, reduced development expenses, and targeted accessibility benefits. Downsides include diminished long-term affordability guarantees, potential loss of zoning flexibility, and reliance on municipal enforcement to prevent covenant erosion.
Expedited permitting reduces approval timelines and lowers regulatory costs for developers.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Targeted accessibility standards ensure a higher proportion of units meet Type B requirements for older adults.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Reduced affordability duration and share decreases the long-term stock of permanently affordable housing.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Mandatory rezoning restrictions lock land use for 20 to 30 years, limiting future municipal flexibility to adapt to changing demographic or economic conditions.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
high confidence. Analysis is grounded in the explicit text of the proposed amendment, official staff summaries, and fiscal/revenue notices. No enacted provisions or external litigation are assumed.
The amendment creates an expedited, hearing-free pathway for cities and Metro to expand urban growth boundaries specifically for housing for older persons and manufactured housing, bypassing standard need demonstrations while imposing long-term affordability (80% of units for 30 years at ≤120% AMI), senior-designation covenants, Type B accessibility standards, and rezoning locks. Material consequences include accelerated land supply for targeted demographics, reduced municipal review burdens, and shifted enforcement responsibilities to local governments over multi-decade periods.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Official staff analysis identifies demographic trends, an increasing older adult population, and the average cost differential between manufactured housing development and traditional site-built housing as factors discussed during committee review.
Basis: Official analysis · Source: Staff Measure Summary B
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The amendment reduces the affordable unit threshold from 100% to 80% and shortens the affordability term from 60 to 30 years while permitting higher density (8 units per net residential acre) in cities of 30,000+ residents. This suggests a policy hypothesis aimed at improving project economics and development velocity by lowering carry costs and administrative friction, though the text does not expressly state this motive.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Gain authority to petition for expedited urban growth boundary expansions without demonstrating housing need or holding public hearings; assume long-term administrative and enforcement obligations for affordability covenants, senior-designation compliance, and accessibility monitoring.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Access streamlined approval timelines, relaxed density/housing-type requirements for manufactured housing, and higher zoning allowances (8 units/acre in cities ≥30,000); must secure 30-year affordability covenants, Type B accessibility compliance, and accept rezoning restrictions.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Potentially gain new housing supply meeting affordability caps (≤120% AMI) and accessibility standards; face reduced long-term affordability guarantees compared to the introduced bill's 60-year requirement.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
May experience expedited urban expansion on the urban-rural fringe, though acreage caps (50 or 100 net residential acres depending on city population) limit scale.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Metro must complete substantial compliance reviews within 120 days and cannot conduct hearings to select or review petitions. Cities must draft conceptual plans that meet modified density, affordability, and senior-designation requirements. Enforcement of 30-year affordability covenants, Type B accessibility standards, and financial penalties for noncompliance falls to local governments. Development costs may shift toward accessibility upgrades and covenant administration, while state/local fiscal impacts remain minimal per official revenue and fiscal statements.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Fiscal Impact Statement B
Cities and Older/Low-Income Residents
A qualifying city rapidly approves a compliant manufactured housing park within months, delivering hundreds of accessible units at ≤120% AMI without protracted land-use litigation or need-demonstration delays, directly addressing a severe senior housing shortage.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Rural Land and Long-Term Housing Security
A developer exploits the streamlined pathway to convert protected urban-fringe land into a senior-manufactured housing enclave, bypassing standard infrastructure capacity or environmental reviews. Over decades, municipal resources prove insufficient to monitor covenant compliance, leading to affordability erosion, accessibility noncompliance, or unauthorized rezoning after restriction periods expire.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
The distinction rests on statutory permission versus enforcement capacity and classification accuracy over time.
Sources · Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Accelerating housing supply for older and lower-income residents through streamlined approvals and relaxed affordability thresholds trades long-term affordability security and public participation for development speed and reduced municipal review burdens. Upsides include faster delivery, higher density options, and decreased administrative friction. Downsides include diminished 60-year affordability guarantees, elimination of public hearings, and potential multi-decade enforcement gaps.
Expedited project timelines reduce developer carry costs and accelerate housing delivery for targeted demographics.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Relaxed density and planning requirements lower development barriers while maintaining affordability caps and accessibility standards.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Reduced affordability duration (30 years vs. 60) and lower unit thresholds (80% vs. 100%) may weaken long-term housing security for low-income households.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Elimination of public hearings and need demonstrations may reduce community input and bypass traditional land-use safeguards.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
high confidence. Analysis is grounded exclusively in the supplied proposed amendment text, official revenue/fiscal statements, and staff measure summaries. Inferences are explicitly labeled and bounded to statutory language.
The amendment creates an expedited, hearing-free pathway for eligible Oregon cities and Metro to expand urban growth boundaries specifically for housing for older persons and manufactured dwellings. It caps additions at 50 or 100 net residential acres depending on city population, removes standard housing-need demonstrations, mandates Metro approval within 120 days, and imposes long-term affordability (80 percent of non-manufactured units for 30 years), senior-designation covenants, Type B accessibility standards, and rezoning restrictions. Materially, it accelerates development timelines and reduces upfront regulatory costs while lowering the guaranteed affordable unit percentage and duration compared to the introduced bill.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Introduced
Official staff analysis identifies demographic trends regarding an increasing older adult population and the average cost differential between manufactured housing development and traditional site-built housing as discussed issues for the measure.
Basis: Official analysis · Source: Staff Measure Summary B
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The amendment likely reflects a legislative compromise aimed at improving financial feasibility for developers by reducing affordability thresholds and duration, while retaining a senior-housing focus to address demographic demand. This inference is drawn from the text’s reduction of required affordable units from 100 percent to 80 percent, the decrease in affordability duration from 60 years to 30 years, and the allowance of higher residential densities in larger cities.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Introduced
Gain expedited authority to expand urban growth boundaries with reduced planning burdens, but assume long-term covenant monitoring responsibilities.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Face faster approval timelines and lower upfront regulatory costs, but must comply with extended affordability covenants, accessibility standards, and rezoning bans.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Gain access to new housing supply, though only 80 percent of non-manufactured units are guaranteed affordable for 30 years.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Manage covenant tracking, compliance monitoring, and property transfer verification across extended restriction periods.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Cities must adopt modified conceptual plans that bypass standard density requirements for manufactured dwellings but allow eight units per net residential acre in cities of 30,000 or more.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Developers must secure Type B accessibility compliance for at least 80 percent of residential units and record enforceable senior-designation covenants with financial penalties.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
State and local fiscal impact is minimal, though municipal enforcement costs may rise from monitoring 30-year affordability restrictions and 20-to-30-year rezoning bans.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement B
The measure incorporates a federal definition for housing for older persons but operates as an Oregon-law change governing urban growth boundary expansions.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Regional housing market and older adult population
A city with 35,000 residents petitions under this section, adds 100 net residential acres of manufactured dwelling parks and senior housing within 120 days, bypasses standard need studies, and delivers high-density, accessible housing at lower construction costs, rapidly resolving a severe regional senior housing shortage.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Existing lower-income residents and municipal land-use integrity
A municipality uses the provision to add 100 acres of manufactured dwelling parks with only 80 percent affordability for 30 years, then allows immediate rezoning of the remaining 20 percent after restrictions expire, triggering speculative development pressure and displacing existing lower-income residents without long-term community benefit.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
The distinction rests on whether local governments actively monitor and record covenants versus passively allowing workarounds that defeat statutory affordability and use limits.
Sources · Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Accelerates senior and manufactured housing supply by cutting regulatory timelines and affordability duration in exchange for long-term municipal enforcement burdens and reduced guaranteed affordable unit percentages. Upsides include faster development, lower upfront costs, and increased density options. Downsides include weaker long-term affordability guarantees, potential covenant monitoring strain, and risk of premature rezoning exploitation.
Faster project delivery reduces holding costs and construction financing burdens for developers.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Higher density allowances in larger cities increase potential housing supply without requiring additional land acquisition.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Reduced affordability duration and unit percentage may limit long-term housing stability for low-income households.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Extended covenant tracking and rezoning enforcement require sustained municipal capacity that may strain smaller jurisdictions.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
high confidence. Analysis is grounded exclusively in the supplied amendment text, introduced bill text, and official legislative revenue/fiscal documents. Inferences are clearly labeled and bounded by statutory language.
Creates a streamlined, hearing-free pathway for cities and Metro to expand urban growth boundaries specifically for senior housing and manufactured dwellings, eliminating the need to demonstrate housing demand, reducing affordability mandates to 80% of units for 30 years, and permitting higher density zoning in larger cities, while imposing long-term age-restricted covenants, accessibility standards, and financial penalties.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The amendment expands eligible housing types to include manufactured dwellings and existing parks, reduces affordability requirements from 100% for 60 years to 80% for 30 years, and allows higher density zoning in cities over 30,000. This suggests a hypothesis that the measure aims to accelerate senior housing development by reducing regulatory and financial barriers for developers and municipalities where traditional construction costs or land-use hurdles are prohibitive.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Gain expedited UGB expansion authority without demonstrating housing need but lose hearing discretion and face long-term enforcement obligations for covenants and accessibility standards.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Benefit from reduced density restrictions, lower affordability thresholds, and a streamlined approval process that decreases permitting timelines and costs.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Gain access to new, accessible housing supply, though the overall share of deeply affordable units is reduced by the 80% mandate and 30-year term.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Bear ongoing administrative burdens to monitor compliance with Type B accessibility standards, financial penalties, and rezoning moratoriums over 20- to 30-year periods.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Development timelines and permitting costs decrease due to eliminated need-demonstration requirements and restricted Metro hearings.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Project feasibility increases with the allowance of eight units per net residential acre in cities over 30,000 and reduced affordability scope.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Long-term land-use flexibility is constrained by mandatory age-restricted covenants and rezoning moratoriums that lock in designated uses for decades.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Enforcement relies on municipal capacity to track compliance with accessibility standards and financial penalties across extended periods, requiring sustained administrative resources.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Municipalities and Senior Residents
A municipality rapidly approves a large manufactured dwelling park using this pathway, bypassing traditional review hurdles and delivering hundreds of accessible, age-restricted units at below-market rates within two years, directly addressing a severe senior housing shortage.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Local Infrastructure and Long-Term Housing Stability
A developer maximizes the eight-unit density allowance and reduced affordability mandate to build a high-density senior community that outpaces local infrastructure capacity, while weak covenant enforcement allows non-compliant occupancy or premature rezoning attempts after restrictions expire, undermining long-term housing stability and accessibility guarantees.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
The distinction rests on statutory compliance versus enforcement capacity; the law permits reduced affordability and streamlined review, but unlawful outcomes arise only if monitoring fails or definitions are misapplied to bypass age-restriction mandates.
Sources · Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Accelerates senior and manufactured housing supply by cutting regulatory and affordability hurdles, but sacrifices long-term affordability depth, universal need-demonstration, and future zoning flexibility to achieve that speed. Upsides include faster development, lower costs, and targeted accessibility; downsides include reduced affordable unit share, potential infrastructure strain, and long-term land-use lock-in.
Faster project delivery and reduced permitting costs for qualifying developments.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Targeted accessibility guarantees (Type B standards) and age-restricted covenants protect senior housing stock.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Reduced affordable unit share (80% vs 100%) and shorter restriction period (30 years vs 60 years) may limit long-term housing stability for low-income households.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Elimination of need-demonstration and hearing requirements may bypass traditional land-use planning safeguards, potentially straining municipal infrastructure.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
high confidence. Analysis is grounded exclusively in the supplied proposed amendment text and official legislative summaries. No external speculation or unverified claims are included.
46 records currently loaded
Records available in the current snapshot.
Earliest loaded signal
Introduced bill text posted
Posted Jan 28, 2026, 3:25 PM PST
Follow the official text for HB 4082 and every amendment branch. Connections come from each amendment's stated base. Horizontal position shows when each document was first posted, when available. Dotted links flag likely related proposals based on their text.
Click a card to isolate its connected lines; use View summary to jump to its details. Horizontal position shows first posting time in Pacific Time. Drag or use the arrow keys to pan. Pinch with two fingers on mobile, or zoom with the controls, +/− keys, or Control/Command + scroll; press 0 to reset. Dashed branches remained proposals. Dotted teal links are text-based early signals, not official amendment relationships.
Selected document summary
Substantial replacement
What the document says to change
delete lines 1 through 32 and insert:
Inferred policy relationships
Related proposal · Amendment -2
Medium confidence from shared inserted text: ORS 659, ORS 94.550.
This is a text-based early signal, not an official statement that one amendment changes the other.
Oregon records no individual sponsors.
Presession filing record
Introduced and printed pursuant to House Rule 12.00. Presession filed.
No deeper official pre-number history was found.
House carrier
Representative Tom Andersen
Third Reading Of House Bills · Version A
Senate carrier
Senator Dick Anderson
Third Reading Of House Measures · Version B
House carrier
Representative Pam Marsh
Possible Consideration Of Senate Amendments · Version B
A carrier presents the measure or report but is not necessarily its sponsor or author.
Records already listed in Activity are not repeated here.
Official origin records are incomplete; missing facts are not inferred.
46 events
Full timeline
46 entries shown.
Chapter 49, (2026 Laws): Effective date June 5, 2026.
Governor signed.
President signed.
Speaker signed.
House concurred in Senate amendments and repassed bill.
Ayes, 43; Nays, 8--Boice, Cate, Harbick, Osborne, Reschke, Rieke Smith, Scharf, Skarlatos; Excused, 5--Hartman, Javadi, Levy B, Owens, Valderrama; Excused for Business of the House, 4--Boshart Davis, Nelson, Nosse, Wright.
Third reading. Carried by Anderson. Passed.
Ayes, 28; Nays, 1--Robinson; Excused, 1--Sollman.
Second reading.
Senate Amendments to A-Engrossed bill text posted
Recommendation: Do pass with amendments to the A-Eng. bill to resolve conflicts. (Printed B-Eng.)
Staff Measure Summary · Version B
Revenue Impact Statement · Version B
Fiscal Impact Statement · Version B
Work Session held.
Work Session
Heard and Reported Out with Amendments · Agenda item 4 · Room HR E · CARRIED OVER FROM THE 2/24 MEETING: Adds to a temporary UGB addition program an option for each city or Metro to also add to its urban growth boundary a site for manufactured dwellings, prefabricated structures or manufactured dwelling parks, or for housing that is predominantly for older persons and affordable for households with incomes not more than 120 percent of area median income.
IS_Impact HB 4082 A4
Revenue Impact Statement
Amendment -A4 adopted
IS_Impact HB 4082 A
Revenue Impact Statement
Public Hearing held.
Public Hearing
Heard · Agenda item 3 · Room HR E · Adds to a temporary UGB addition program an option for each city or Metro to also add to its urban growth boundary a site for manufactured dwellings, prefabricated structures or manufactured dwelling parks, or for housing that is predominantly for older persons and affordable for households with incomes not more than 120 percent of area median income.
IS_Impact HB 4082 A
Revenue Impact Statement
Referred to Housing and Development.
First reading. Referred to President's desk.
Vote explanation(s) filed by Walters.
Third reading. Carried by Andersen. Passed.
Ayes, 45; Nays, 4--Cate, Reschke, Scharf, Wallan; Excused, 4--Hartman, Lewis, Sosa, Valderrama; Excused for Business of the House, 7--Boshart Davis, Bunch, Diehl, Gomberg, Harbick, Nguyen D, Watanabe.
Second reading.
House Amendments to Introduced bill text posted
Recommendation: Do pass with amendments and be printed A-Engrossed.
Work Session held.
Work Session
Heard and Reported Out with Amendments · Agenda item 9 · Room HR 40 · Adds to a temporary UGB addition program an option for each city or Metro to also add to its urban growth boundary a site for manufactured dwelling parks, or for housing for older persons, that is affordable for households with incomes not more than 120 percent of area median income.
IS_Impact HB 4082 2
Revenue Impact Statement
Amendment -2 adopted
Amendment -1 proposed
Possible Work Session
Not Heard · Agenda item 6 · Room HR 40 · Adds to a temporary UGB addition program an option for each city or Metro to also add to its urban growth boundary a site for manufactured dwelling parks, or for housing for older persons, that is affordable for households with incomes not more than 120 percent of area median income.
Amendment -1 proposed
Public Hearing held.
Public Hearing
Heard · Agenda item 5 · Room HR 40 · Adds to a temporary UGB addition program an option for each city or Metro to also add to its urban growth boundary a site for manufactured dwelling parks, or for housing for older persons, that is affordable for households with incomes not more than 120 percent of area median income.
Amendment -1 proposed
Referred to Housing and Homelessness.
First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
1 Laws 2025, and section 4 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 2 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 3 “(5) Section 53, chapter 110, Oregon
1 Laws 2025, and section 4 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 2 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 3 (5) Section 53, chapter 110, Oregon L
, as amended by section 8 2 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 3 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 4 “(9) Section 57, chapter 110, Oregon
8 Laws 2025, and section 7 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 9 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 10 “(8) Section 56, chapter 110, Oregon
8 Laws 2025, and section 7 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 9 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 10 (8) Section 56, chapter 110, Oregon L
, as amended by section 2 12 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 13 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 14 “(3) Section 51, chapter 110, Oregon
, as amended by section 9 12 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 13 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 14 “(13) Section 11 [of this 2026 Act],
, as amended by section 3 15 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 16 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 17 “(4) Section 52, chapter 110, Oregon
, as amended by section 5 22 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 23 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 24 “(6) Section 54, chapter 110, Oregon
, as amended by section 6 25 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 26 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 27 “(7) Section 55, chapter 110, Oregon
0 (1) or 56, LC 94/HB 4082-2 1 chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, or section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, or may petition 2 to add a site under section 51, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 20
ary under section 50 (1) or 56, chapter 35 110, Oregon Laws 2024, or section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, or may petition to add a site LC 94/HB 4082-A4 1 under section 51, chapter
undary under section 50 (1) or 56, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, or section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, or may petition to add a site under section 51, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024.
ary under section 50 (1) or 56, 9 chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, or section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, or may petition 10 to add a site under section 51, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 20
ary under section 50 (1) or 56, 16 chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, or section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, or may petition 17 to add a site under section 51, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 20
ary under section 50 (1) or 56, 18 chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, or section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, or may petition 19 to add a site under section 51, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 20
aled and section 60, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 36 2024, as amended by section 4, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 12, chapter ___, 37 Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), i
d 4 and section 60, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 5 4, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 12, chapter ___, Oregon 6 Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), i
dment under section 50 or 58, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, [or] 41 section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, or section 2 of this 2026 Act [of this 2025 Act]; or 42 (b) Metro, for an amen
dment under section 50 or 58, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, [or] 14 section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, or section 2 of this 2026 Act [of this 2025 Act]; or 15 (b) Metro, for an amen
4 “(9) Section 57, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 3, 5 chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, [and] section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 6 2025, and section 3 of this 2026
pter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 18 “(12) Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, as amended by section 9 [of this 2026 Act], 19 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (
undary under section 50 (1) or 56, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, or section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, or may petition to add a site under section 51, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024.
r 110, Oregon Laws 2024, is repealed on January 10 2, 2033. 11 “(12) Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, as amended by section 9 12 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (
, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 3 [of this 2025 Act], 31 chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 3 of 32 this 2026 Act, i
0, 34 Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 35 [(3)] (7) Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, [of this 2025 Act] is repealed on January 36 2, 2033. 37 (8) Section 2 of this
ary under section 50 (1) or 56, chapter 41 110, Oregon Laws 2024, or section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, or may petition to add a site 42 under section 51, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 20
, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 3 [of this 2025 Act], 4 chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 3 of 5 this 2026 Act, i
0, 7 Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 8 [(3)] (7) Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, [of this 2025 Act] is repealed on January 9 2, 2033. 10 (8) Section 2 of this
SECTION 3. Section 57, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 3, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 57. (1
mendment under section 50 or 58, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, [or] section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, or section 2 of this 2026 Act [of this 2025 Act]; or (b) Metro, for an amendm
dment under section 50 or 58, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, [or] 37 section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, or section 2 of this 2026 Act [of this 2025 Act]; or 38 (b) Metro, for an amen
SECTION 4. Section 60, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 4, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 60. (1) Section 49, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, a
57, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 3 [of this 2025 Act], chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 3 of this 2026 Act, is r
er 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. [(3)] (7) Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, [of this 2025 Act] is repealed on January 2, 2033. (8) Section 2 of this 2026
epealed and section 60, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 4, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 12, chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is a
, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 3 [of this 2025 Act], 27 chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 3 of 28 this 2026 Act, i
0, 30 Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 31 [(3)] (7) Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, [of this 2025 Act] is repealed on January 32 2, 2033. 33 (8) Section 2 of this
aled and section 60, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, 36 as amended by section 4, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 12, chapter ___, Oregon 37 Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), i
2033. (9) Section 57, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 3, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, [and] section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 3 of this 2026 Act
chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, is repealed on January 2, 2033. (12) Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, as amended by section 9 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enr
apter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 18 (12) Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, as amended by section 9 [of this 2026 Act], 19 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (
age 3 of the printed A-engrossed bill, after line 5, insert: 2 “SECTION 2a. If House Bill 4035 becomes law, section 2 of this 2026 Act 3 is amended to read: 4 “ Sec. 2. (1)
ge 3 of the printed A-engrossed bill, after line 5, insert: 2 “ SECTION 2a. If House Bill 4035 becomes law, section 2 of this 2026 Act is amended to read: 3 “ Sec. 2. (1) As
E SUMMARY EFFECT OF AMENDMENT: The amendment resolves potential conflicts with House Bill 4035 B (2026) by changing the term “net residential acres” to “net buildable acres.”
residential acres” to “net buildable acres.” It is contingent on the passage of HB 4035 B (2026). BACKGROUND: Oregon’s UGB system is intended to manage urban expansion
bricated structures.”. 33 On page 4, after line 10, insert: 34 “ SECTION 4a. If House Bill 4035 becomes law, section 4 of this 2026 Act (amending sec- 35 tion 60, chapter 110,
y years for manufactured dwellings or prefabricated structures. SECTION 2a. If House Bill 4035 becomes law, section 2 of this 2026 Act is amended to read: Sec. 2. (1) As use
A-Eng. HB 4082 Page 3 1 On page 4, after line 10, insert: 2 “SECTION 4a. If House Bill 4035 becomes law, section 4 of this 2026 3 Act (amending section 60, chapter 110, O
hapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 12, chapter ___, 37 Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is amended to read: 38 “ Sec. 60. (1) Section 49, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 20
hapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 12, chapter ___, Oregon 6 Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is amended to read: 7 “ Sec. 60. (1) Section 49, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 20
5, and section 1 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled 40 House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 41 “(2) Section 50, chapter 110, Oregon Laws
Laws 2025, and section 1 [of this 2026 Act], 9 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on 10 January 2, 2033. 11 “(2) Section 50, chapter 110, Oregon La
, as amended by section 2 [of this 2026 Act], 42 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 43 “(3) Section 51, chapter 110, Oregon Laws
, as amended by section 3 [of this 2026 Act], 44 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 45 “(4) Section 52, chapter 110, Oregon Laws
Laws 2025, and section 4 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, 19 Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 20 2033. 21 “(5) Section 53, chapter 110, Oregon La
, as amended by section 5 [of this 2026 Act], 4 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 5 “(6) Section 54, chapter 110, Oregon Laws
years for manufactured dwellings or prefabricated structures. 8 SECTION 2a. If House Bill 4035 becomes law, section 2 of this 2026 Act is amended to read: 9 Sec. 2. (1) As u
, as amended by section 6 [of this 2026 Act], 6 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 7 “(7) Section 55, chapter 110, Oregon Laws
Laws 2025, and section 7 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, 29 Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 30 2033. HB 4082-A4 2/25/26 Proposed Amendments to
, as amended by section 8 [of this 2026 Act], 11 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 12 “(9) Section 57, chapter 110, Oregon Laws
, as amended by section 9 [of this 2026 Act], 19 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 20 “(13) Section 11 [of this 2026 Act], chapt
2, 2033. 20 “(13) Section 11 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), 21 is repealed on January 2, 2033. 22 “ (14) Section 2 of this 2026 Act, as a
13) Section 11 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (En- 15 rolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 16 “ (14) Section 2 of this 2026 Act, as amen
(8) Section 2 of this 2026 Act is repealed on January 2, 2033. SECTION 4a. If House Bill 4035 becomes law, section 4 of this 2026 Act (amending section 60, chapter 110, Oreg
, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 12, chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is amended to read: Sec. 60. (1) Section 49, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024,
gon Laws 2025, and section 1 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (2) Section 50, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
024, as amended by section 2 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (3) Section 51, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
024, as amended by section 3 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (4) Section 52, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
gon Laws 2025, and section 4 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (5) Section 53, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
024, as amended by section 5 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (6) Section 54, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
024, as amended by section 6 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (7) Section 55, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
8) Section 2 of this 2026 Act is repealed on January 2, 2033. 34 SECTION 4a. If House Bill 4035 becomes law, section 4 of this 2026 Act (amending section 35 60, chapter 110, O
gon Laws 2025, and section 7 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (8) Section 56, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
024, as amended by section 8 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (9) Section 57, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
hapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 12, chapter ___, Oregon 37 Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is amended to read: 38 Sec. 60. (1) Section 49, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024
5, and section 1 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled 40 House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 41 (2) Section 50, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2
, as amended by section 2 [of this 2026 Act], 42 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 43 (3) Section 51, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2
025, as amended by section 9 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (13) Section 11 [of this 2026 Act], chapter
, as amended by section 3 [of this 2026 Act], 44 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 45 (4) Section 52, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2
ry 2, 2033. (13) Section 11 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. (14) Section 2 of this 2026 Act, as amended
, as amended by section 5 [of this 2026 Act], 4 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 5 (6) Section 54, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2
, as amended by section 6 [of this 2026 Act], 6 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 7 (7) Section 55, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2
, as amended by section 8 [of this 2026 Act], 11 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 12 (9) Section 57, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2
, as amended by section 9 [of this 2026 Act], 19 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), is repealed on January 2, 2033. 20 (13) Section 11 [of this 2026 Act], chapte
2, 2033. 20 (13) Section 11 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled House Bill 4035), 21 is repealed on January 2, 2033. 22 (14) Section 2 of this 2026 Act, as ame
2024, as amended by section 3, chapter 341, 34 Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 35 Sec. 57. (1) Within 21 days after the adoption of an am
60. (1) Section 49, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by 8 section 4, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 1 [of this 2026 Act], 9 chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled H
17 “(4) Section 52, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 5, 18 chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 4 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, 19 Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled H
2024, as amended by section 3, chapter 341, 7 Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 8 Sec. 57. (1) Within 21 days after the adoption of an am
27 “(7) Section 55, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 6, 28 chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, 29 Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled H
24, as amended by section 3, chapter 341, Oregon 13 Laws 2025, [and] section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 3 of this 2026 Act, is re- 14 pealed on January 2, 2033. 15 “(10)
7 “(10) Section 58, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 8 8, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 9 “(11) Section 59, chapter 110, Oregon Laws
d by section 3 [of this 2025 Act], 31 chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 3 of 32 this 2026 Act, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 33 (6) Sect
d by section 3 [of this 2025 Act], 4 chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 3 of 5 this 2026 Act, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 6 (6) Sect
ws 2024, as amended by section 3, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: Sec. 57. (1) Within 21 days after the adoption of an amen
2024, as amended by section 3, chapter 341, 30 Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is amended to read: 31 Sec. 57. (1) Within 21 days after the adoption of an am
ec. 60. (1) Section 49, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 4, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. [(1)] (2) Sections [49 to 56, 58] 50, 51, 53,
2033. (3) Section 52, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 5, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. (4) Section 55, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024
2033. (4) Section 55, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 6, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. [(2)] (5) Section 57, chapter 110, Oregon Law
nded by section 3 [of this 2025 Act], chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 3 of this 2026 Act, is repealed on January 2, 2033. Enrolled Hous
age 4 (6) Section 58, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 8, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. [(3)] (7) Section 2, chapter 341, Oregon Laws
ec. 60. (1) Section 49, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 4, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 1 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled Hous
2033. (4) Section 52, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 5, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 4 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled Hous
d by section 3 [of this 2025 Act], 27 chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 3 of 28 this 2026 Act, is repealed on January 2, 2033. 29 (6) Sect
2033. (7) Section 55, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 6, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 7 [of this 2026 Act], chapter ___, Oregon Laws 2026 (Enrolled Hous
2024, as amended by section 3, chapter 341, Oregon Laws 2025, [and] section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 3 of this 2026 Act, is re- pealed on January 2, 2033. (10) Sectio
2033. (10) Section 58, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 2024, as amended by section 8, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, is repealed on January 2, 2033. (11) Section 59, chapter 110, Oregon Laws 202
24, as amended by section 3, chapter 341, Oregon 13 Laws 2025, [and] section 7, chapter 530, Oregon Laws 2025, and section 3 of this 2026 Act, is re- 14 pealed on January 2, 2033. 15 (10) S
tment of Land Conservation and Development’s existing review process created by Senate Bill 1537 (2024). The measure establishes criteria and timelines for review, limits the a
eview process by the Department of Land Conservation and Development created by Senate Bill 1537 (2024). The measure establishes criteria and timelines for review, limits the a
res ISSUES DISCUSSED: Eligibility of qualifying cities to add sites under the Senate Bill 1537 (2024) Housing affordability covenant durations Manufactured dwellings and
ndaries Requirements and components of the land-addition framework created by SB 1537 (2024) This summary has not been adopted or officially endorsed by action of th
ation with special districts that provide important services in the urban area. SB 1537 created a one-time option for qualifying cities to add up to 100 net acres of r
ation with special districts that provide important services in the urban area. Senate Bill 1537 (2024) took effect on June 6, 2024, and created a one-time option for qualifyin
“Enrolled bill text posted”
Confirm with the official record.
Supplemental, source-linked analysis from project researchers and community contributors. It is separate from Oregon's official record.