SB 1571
Plain-language analysis
Generated analysis, not an official summary or legal advice. Confirm with linked Oregon documents.
The enrolled bill expands Oregon’s statutory definition of “tobacco products” to explicitly include all nicotine-containing items likely intended for human consumption, specifically naming oral nicotine pouches and lozenges, while excluding foods with trace naturally occurring nicotine. It mandates age-verification signage for retailers, requires the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) to adopt rules on labeling, child-resistant packaging, and minor-unattractive packaging for inhalant delivery systems, and prohibits selling cigarettes in unsealed packages under 20 count. Material consequence: Retailers and manufacturers of synthetic or non-tobacco nicotine products will face uniform state age-verification, packaging, and labeling requirements aligned with federal standards, closing prior regulatory gaps.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
Official staff analysis states the measure aligns Oregon law with federal FDA definitions for non-tobacco nicotine (NTN) products, responding to civil penalty data showing thousands of nationwide complaints for unlawful sales of oral nicotine products to minors, including 170 in Oregon.
Basis: Official analysis · Sources: Staff Measure Summary A; Staff Measure Summary A
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The text’s explicit inclusion of “oral nicotine pouches and lozenges” alongside a broad “any product that contains or is made or derived from tobacco or nicotine” suggests a legislative intent to prevent manufacturers from classifying synthetic nicotine items as dietary supplements or novelty goods to bypass state tobacco regulations.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
Must post mandated age-verification notices, ensure inhalant delivery systems meet OHA labeling/packaging rules, and strictly enforce the under-21 sales ban.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Enrolled; Fiscal Impact Statement A
Must reformulate or reclassify products to comply with the expanded tobacco definition, adopt child-resistant and minor-unattractive packaging for inhalant systems, and align labeling with OHA/FDA rules.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Enrolled; Fiscal Impact Statement A
Gains statutory authority to adopt rules governing labeling, packaging, and retail notices for inhalant delivery systems, requiring administrative rulemaking resources.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Enrolled; Fiscal Impact Statement A
Minors face stricter retail barriers to purchasing nicotine products; adults retain legal access but may encounter higher retail compliance costs or reduced product variety if manufacturers withdraw non-compliant items.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
Retailers will need to train staff on age verification and update point-of-sale signage.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
Retailers must post OHA-prescribed notices for both tobacco and inhalant delivery systems. Sellers cannot distribute cigarettes in unsealed packages under 20 count.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
Legislative Revenue Office and Fiscal Office report no direct state/local revenue impact, but retailers and manufacturers will bear compliance costs for signage, packaging redesign, and rule alignment.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: IS_Impact SB 1571 2; Revenue Impact Statement A; Fiscal Impact Statement A
OHA retains authority to assist in monitoring federal tobacco regulations; violations remain unlawful under existing ORS 167.755, with penalties likely tied to civil monetary frameworks.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Enrolled; Staff Measure Summary A
Legal access for adults remains intact, but retail compliance burdens may reduce product availability or increase prices. Synthetic nicotine products previously outside state tobacco law will now face identical restrictions as traditional tobacco.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Enrolled; Staff Measure Summary A
Public Health & Regulatory Compliance
A comprehensive regulatory framework eliminates all synthetic nicotine loopholes, resulting in a measurable decline in under-21 retail purchases and aligning Oregon with federal public health standards without creating new tax burdens.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Enrolled; Staff Measure Summary A
Small Retailers & Supply Chain
Small independent retailers face disproportionate compliance costs for child-resistant packaging and OHA-mandated signage, forcing some to exit the market or raise prices significantly, while a parallel unregulated market expands due to supply chain disruptions.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Enrolled; Fiscal Impact Statement A
The statute grants OHA rulemaking authority specifically for labeling and packaging of inhalant delivery systems, not general product classification. Absent explicit statutory limits, administrative expansion could occur.
Sources · Enrolled
Expanding the tobacco definition ensures consistent youth protection and regulatory alignment but imposes compliance costs on retailers and manufacturers while requiring OHA to develop new rules.
Uniform age-verification and packaging standards reduce youth access to synthetic nicotine products.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Enrolled
Alignment with federal FDA definitions simplifies interstate compliance for manufacturers.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Staff Measure Summary A
Retailers and manufacturers face upfront compliance costs for signage, packaging redesign, and rule alignment.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
OHA must allocate administrative resources to draft and enforce new rules without dedicated funding.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Fiscal Impact Statement A
The enrolled version retains the statutory language from the Senate amendments without substantive modification. Key provisions remain unchanged: expanded tobacco product definition, explicit inclusion of oral nicotine pouches and lozenges, exclusion of foods with trace naturally occurring nicotine, retailer signage mandates, OHA rulemaking authority for inhalant delivery systems, and prohibition on unsealed cigarette packages under 20 count. The enrolled text adds final legislative formatting, signatures, and the standard effective date clause (91 days after adjournment sine die).
No substantive change identified.
Tradeoff: No substantive tradeoffs altered between versions; the enrolled version finalizes the Senate committee’s policy choices.
high confidence. Analysis is grounded in enrolled statutory text, official legislative revenue/fiscal statements, and staff measure summaries. No speculation is presented as established fact.
Possible effects if adopted; not current bill text.
If adopted, this amendment would explicitly classify oral nicotine pouches, lozenges, and synthetic nicotine products as "tobacco products" under Oregon law, mandate Oregon Health Authority rules for labeling, child-resistant packaging, and minor-unattractive design of inhalant delivery systems, preserve existing criminal penalties for sales to minors by referencing ORS 167.755, and remove the introduced bill's proposed bans on online sales and free distribution of these products. Material consequences include expanded regulatory scope for nicotine products, increased compliance costs for manufacturers and retailers, and continued reliance on criminal enforcement rather than a new civil penalty framework.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The amendment likely aims to align state statutory definitions with federal FDA classifications for non-tobacco nicotine while preserving existing criminal enforcement mechanisms.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Staff Measure Summary A; Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Must post age-restriction notices and comply with future OHA rules on labeling, child-resistant packaging, and minor-unattractive design.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Now explicitly subject to state "tobacco product" classification, requiring packaging redesign and labeling compliance.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Charged with adopting rules defining labeling standards, child-resistant packaging requirements, and minor-attractiveness criteria for inhalant delivery systems, ensuring alignment with FDA regulations.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Continued prohibition on purchase and sale of these products, with enhanced packaging and labeling intended to reduce accessibility and appeal.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Retailers will need to update point-of-sale signage and verify supplier compliance with new OHA packaging rules before stocking products.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Manufacturers must reformulate or repackage oral nicotine and inhalant delivery systems to meet child-resistant and non-minor-attractive standards, potentially increasing production costs.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Enforcement of sales violations will continue under existing criminal statutes rather than a newly established civil penalty system, affecting liability structures and prosecutorial pathways.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
No state or local revenue impact is anticipated from the amendment.
Basis: Stakeholder claim · Sources: IS_Impact SB 1571 2; Revenue Impact Statement A
Manufacturer of synthetic nicotine pouches
Successfully redesigns packaging to meet strict OHA child-resistant and non-attractive standards, preventing pediatric exposure incidents while maintaining lawful market access.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Small retailer
Unknowingly stocks an inhalant delivery system that technically meets federal labeling rules but is deemed "attractive to minors" by OHA rulemaking, resulting in criminal prosecution under existing statutes and business closure due to compliance costs.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
The text legally permits rulemaking aligned with federal standards but does not define thresholds for minor appeal or therapeutic exemption verification, creating room for discretionary enforcement that could exceed statutory intent.
Sources · Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Expanding the statutory definition to capture synthetic nicotine and oral delivery methods strengthens regulatory alignment with federal standards but shifts compliance burdens to manufacturers and retailers while preserving criminal penalties that may lack the flexibility of civil enforcement frameworks. Upsides include clearer regulatory scope and reduced minor access via packaging rules; downsides include increased compliance costs, potential for strict liability under criminal statutes, and removal of broader consumer protection measures such as online sales restrictions.
Clearer regulatory scope reduces ambiguity around synthetic nicotine and oral products.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Mandated child-resistant and non-attractive packaging reduces minor accessibility.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Increased compliance costs for manufacturers and retailers due to packaging and labeling requirements.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Retention of criminal penalties may limit enforcement flexibility compared to a civil framework.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
Removal of online sales and free distribution bans reduces consumer protection mechanisms present in the introduced bill.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -3 — proposed amendment
high confidence. Analysis is grounded in the explicit statutory text of the proposed amendment, official revenue/fiscal statements, and staff measure summaries. No enacted status or unverified external claims are used.
If adopted, this amendment would expand Oregon’s statutory definition of “tobacco products” to explicitly cover all nicotine-containing items intended for human consumption (including oral pouches and lozenges), mandate Oregon Health Authority rulemaking for labeling, child-resistant packaging, and minor-attractive packaging controls on inhalant delivery systems, require retailers to post under-21 sales notices, and maintain the under-21 sales prohibition while removing the introduced bill’s ban on online sales and its face-to-face transaction requirement. While the amendment incorporates federal FDA definitions by reference, it operates exclusively as an Oregon statutory change governing state-level product classification, retail obligations, and enforcement standards.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment; Introduced
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The amendment likely aims to harmonize Oregon’s product definitions with federal FDA standards for non-tobacco nicotine while streamlining enforcement by removing broader retail transaction restrictions that may have faced implementation or commerce challenges, focusing regulatory effort instead on packaging and labeling controls. This inference is drawn from staff summaries noting federal alignment and civil penalty data for oral nicotine sales to minors, alongside the amendment’s removal of online/in-person sale provisions in favor of product-focused rules.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Staff Measure Summary A; Staff Measure Summary A
Must procure and display specific under-21 sales notices, comply with OHA rules on labeling and packaging for inhalant delivery systems, and bear strict liability for any employee or agent who sells to a person under 21.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Must ensure products meet the expanded state definition and comply with new packaging/labeling standards aligned with FDA regulations, potentially requiring reformulation or repackaging.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
Remain prohibited from purchasing tobacco or nicotine products; the amendment clarifies product categorization but does not alter the age limit.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Tasked with adopting rules for notices, labeling, and packaging of inhalant delivery systems, ensuring consistency with federal FDA regulations.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Retailers will need to adjust inventory sourcing, update point-of-sale displays, and implement rigorous age-verification protocols to avoid strict liability penalties. Manufacturers may incur compliance costs to meet child-resistant and non-minor-attractive packaging standards. Enforcement focus shifts from transaction method (e.g., online bans) to product design and age verification at the point of sale, potentially reducing administrative burdens for legal e-commerce while increasing scrutiny on physical product attributes.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment; Staff Measure Summary A
Manufacturers and public health stakeholders
A manufacturer successfully reformulates a widely used oral nicotine pouch with fully compliant child-resistant packaging and clear FDA-aligned labeling, entering the Oregon market without regulatory friction while effectively preventing accidental pediatric exposure.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Small retailers and product vendors
A small retailer unknowingly stocks an inhalant delivery system with packaging deemed “attractive to minors” under newly adopted OHA rules, faces repeated compliance inspections, and incurs substantial civil penalties or inventory loss due to strict liability for a single employee’s failure to verify age.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
inference
Sources · Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
The measure prioritizes public health alignment with federal nicotine product standards and targeted packaging controls over broader retail transaction restrictions, trading expanded regulatory oversight of product design for reduced barriers to legal commerce while maintaining strict age-verification enforcement. Upsides include clearer federal-state alignment and focused consumer safety measures; downsides include potential compliance costs for manufacturers and reliance on OHA rulemaking that may inadvertently restrict legitimate adult markets.
Clearer alignment with federal FDA definitions reduces regulatory confusion for multi-state distributors.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Staff Measure Summary A
Targeted packaging and labeling rules may reduce accidental pediatric exposure without disrupting lawful adult commerce.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Strict liability for business entities increases compliance training and monitoring costs.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
Reliance on OHA rulemaking introduces uncertainty regarding final packaging standards and enforcement timelines.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -2 — proposed amendment
high confidence. Analysis is grounded in the explicit text of the proposed amendment, official staff summaries, and fiscal/revenue impact statements. Inferences are clearly labeled and bounded to the supplied documents.
The amendment would prohibit direct-to-consumer shipping of cigarettes, inhalant delivery systems, smokeless tobacco, and other tobacco products in Oregon while exempting cigars, mandate that all covered sales occur face-to-face on licensed premises, and grant the Attorney General authority to issue investigative demands for tobacco-related violations.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The amendment likely aims to restrict direct-to-consumer online sales of nicotine and tobacco products while carving out a specific exemption for cigars, possibly to simplify enforcement pathways or align state shipping restrictions with existing regulatory frameworks.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Must cease shipping covered products directly to Oregon residents and can only distribute through licensed distributors or retailers, potentially requiring market exit or supply chain restructuring.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Must verify premises licensing and enforce mandatory face-to-face sales, increasing compliance monitoring obligations and subjecting operations to potential Attorney General investigations.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Retain the ability to ship directly to consumers or bypass face-to-face requirements, creating a distinct regulatory advantage over other tobacco product categories.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Gains statutory authority to issue investigative demands for testimony, interrogatories, and document production related to tobacco violations.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Retailers will incur costs to verify premises licensing status and implement in-person age verification protocols, shifting compliance from digital checks to physical point-of-sale procedures.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
The Attorney General's new investigative demand authority lowers the evidentiary threshold for tobacco violations, potentially increasing regulatory scrutiny and enforcement actions against noncompliant sellers.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Freight, motor, and air carriers are explicitly shielded from liability when transporting covered products, reducing logistical friction for legitimate distribution networks.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Oregon public health and licensed retailers
A licensed Oregon retailer successfully blocks all illicit direct-to-consumer shipments of nicotine products, significantly reducing minor access and standardizing age verification through mandatory in-person checks.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Online tobacco merchants and consumers
A legitimate online tobacco merchant faces insurmountable compliance costs to restructure its supply chain for Oregon, forcing market exit and eliminating consumer choice while leaving a vacuum filled by unregulated gray-market sellers who ignore the face-to-face requirement.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
The text legally permits targeted investigations and product-specific exemptions, but operational ambiguity around premises licensing and substantial assistance could enable enforcement drift or competitive distortion.
Sources · Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
The measure prioritizes stricter control over direct-to-consumer tobacco distribution and enhances Attorney General enforcement tools at the cost of market access for online merchants and creates a distinct regulatory carve-out for cigars that may distort competitive fairness.
Reduced minor access through mandatory in-person sales and restricted shipping channels.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Clearer enforcement pathways via Attorney General investigative demands and carrier liability exemptions.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Increased compliance burdens and potential market contraction for direct-to-consumer tobacco sellers.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Uneven regulatory treatment that favors cigar distributors over other tobacco product categories.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
high confidence. Analysis is grounded exclusively in the provided proposed amendment text and official legislative context. No enacted status or unverified claims are included.
The proposed amendment restructures Oregon’s prohibitions on shipping tobacco and nicotine products into the state and mandates face-to-face retail sales, explicitly exempting cigars from the in-person requirement. It also grants the Attorney General direct authority to issue investigative demands for tobacco-related violations while excluding participating manufacturers from that definition. If adopted, retailers will face clarified compliance boundaries for point-of-sale verification, e-commerce shippers must route Oregon orders through licensed distributors or retailers, and the AG gains expanded enforcement tools that do not apply to participating manufacturers.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Official sources do not state why this measure was proposed.
Sponsor testimony, staff summaries, committee materials, or statutory findings may explain it.
Inferred from cited text; not a stated purpose.
The amendment likely aims to resolve statutory drafting ambiguities in the original shipping and retail provisions while aligning enforcement mechanisms with existing tobacco regulatory frameworks. The text removes bracketed connector words, renumbers subsections for structural clarity, explicitly carves out cigars from face-to-face requirements, and adds a targeted AG investigative demand tool that excludes participating manufacturers to avoid duplicating or conflicting with existing manufacturer oversight structures.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Must ensure face-to-face sales on licensed premises for all covered products except cigars, requiring updated point-of-sale verification procedures and premises licensing compliance.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Prohibited from shipping covered tobacco/nicotine products directly to Oregon consumers; must route orders through licensed distributors or retailers.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Exempt from the shipping prohibition when operating as common carriers under specified federal definitions.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Gains direct authority to issue investigative demands for tobacco violations, expanding enforcement reach beyond existing agency protocols.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Explicitly excluded from the AG’s new investigative demand authority, preserving their existing regulatory relationship with other agencies.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Retailers will need to audit point-of-sale procedures to guarantee face-to-face exchanges for non-cigar products and maintain licensed premises status. E-commerce tobacco sellers must adjust fulfillment logistics to route Oregon orders through licensed in-state distributors or retailers rather than direct shipping. The AG’s new demand authority may increase compliance investigations but excludes participating manufacturers, potentially limiting overlap with existing manufacturer agreements. Official analyses indicate no revenue impact and minimal fiscal impact on state or local government expenditures.
Basis: Inferred · Sources: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment; Fiscal Impact Statement A; Revenue Impact Statement A
Rural cigar retailer
Legally continues direct-to-consumer mail-order sales without face-to-face age verification, preserving a niche market and reducing operational costs while remaining fully compliant with the explicit statutory carve-out.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Logistics company
Inadvertently ships nicotine pouches to an Oregon consumer via a standard freight carrier that does not meet the specific federal common-carrier exemption criteria, triggering substantial civil penalties and forcing costly supply chain restructuring.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
The text legally permits the Attorney General to issue investigative demands for tobacco violations, but weak enforcement standards or broad interpretation of substantial assistance could lead to unlawful targeting of independent retailers or legitimate third-party logistics providers. Misclassification of products (e.g., treating a nicotine lozenge as a non-tobacco medical product) could trigger unwarranted investigations against manufacturers or pharmacies, creating duty creep beyond the statute’s intended scope.
Sources · Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Expands enforcement authority and clarifies retail shipping rules while carving out cigars from face-to-face requirements, balancing regulatory consistency with market access for specific tobacco categories. Upsides include clearer compliance pathways for carriers, targeted AG enforcement tools, and preserved cigar sales channels. Downsides include potential compliance complexity for mixed-product retailers, risk of overreach in investigative demands, and possible regulatory gaps if product classifications are ambiguous.
Clearer compliance pathways for carriers and shippers due to explicit federal exemption language.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Targeted AG enforcement tools that streamline tobacco violation investigations without duplicating manufacturer oversight.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Preserved cigar sales channels that reduce operational friction for niche retailers.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Compliance complexity for mixed-product retailers navigating face-to-face requirements versus cigar exemptions.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Risk of enforcement overreach if investigative demands are applied broadly to entities outside the statute’s intent.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
Regulatory gaps if product classifications remain ambiguous, leaving retailers and manufacturers uncertain about coverage.
Basis: Inferred · Source: Amendment -1 — proposed amendment
high confidence. Analysis is grounded in the explicit statutory text of the proposed amendment and official legislative revenue/fiscal statements. Inferences are bounded to the text’s structural changes and enforcement mechanisms.
35 records currently loaded
Records available in the current snapshot.
Earliest loaded signal
Introduced bill text posted
Posted Jan 28, 2026, 3:25 PM PST
Follow the official text for SB 1571 and every amendment branch. Connections come from each amendment's stated base. Horizontal position shows when each document was first posted, when available. Dotted links flag likely related proposals based on their text.
Click a card to isolate its connected lines; use View summary to jump to its details. Horizontal position shows first posting time in Pacific Time. Drag or use the arrow keys to pan. Pinch with two fingers on mobile, or zoom with the controls, +/− keys, or Control/Command + scroll; press 0 to reset. Dashed branches remained proposals. Dotted teal links are text-based early signals, not official amendment relationships.
Selected document summary
Targeted changes
What the document says to change
On page 1 of the printed bill, line 2, after “adults;” insert “creating new 2 provisions;” and after “180.
No deeper official pre-number history was found.
Chief sponsors: Senator Lisa Reynolds
Regular sponsors: Senator Kayse Jama, Senator Courtney Neron Misslin, Senator Deb Patterson, Senator Janeen Sollman, Representative Zach Hudson, Representative Shannon Isadore, Representative Hai Pham, Representative Tom Andersen, Representative Mari Watanabe
Senate carrier
Senator Lisa Reynolds
Third Reading Of Senate Measures · Version A
House carrier
Representative Hai Pham
Third Reading Of Senate Bills · Version A
A carrier presents the measure or report but is not necessarily its sponsor or author.
Records already listed in Activity are not repeated here.
Official origin records are incomplete; missing facts are not inferred.
35 events
Full timeline
35 entries shown.
Effective date, June 5, 2026.
Chapter 94, 2026 Laws.
Governor signed.
Speaker signed.
President signed.
Third reading. Carried by Pham H. Passed.
Ayes, 36; Nays, 8--Breese-Iverson, Cate, Edwards, Evans, Helfrich, Lewis, McIntire, Reschke; Absent, 6--Boshart Davis, Harbick, Osborne, Scharf, Skarlatos, Yunker; Excused, 4--Diehl, Hartman, Levy E, Mannix; Excused for Business of the House, 6--Bowman, Elmer, Javadi, Sosa, Walters, Speaker Fahey.
Second reading.
Recommendation: Do pass.
Staff Measure Summary · Version A
Public Hearing and Work Session held.
Public Hearing and Work Session
Heard and Reported Out · Agenda item 5 · Room HR 50 · Adds a definition of "nicotine" and expands the definition of "tobacco products."
IS_Impact SB 1571 A
Revenue Impact Statement
Referred to Rules.
First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
Third reading. Carried by Reynolds. Passed.
Ayes, 26; Nays, 1--Robinson; Excused, 3--Drazan, Linthicum, Sollman.
Second reading.
Senate Amendments to Introduced bill text posted
Recommendation: Do pass with amendments. (Printed A-Eng.)
Work Session held.
Work Session
Heard and Reported Out with Amendments · Agenda item 7 · Room HR C · Adds definition of "nicotine" and expands definition of "tobacco products.
Amendment -3 adopted
IS_Impact SB 1571 2
Revenue Impact Statement
Amendment -2 proposed
Amendment -1 proposed
Public Hearing held.
Public Hearing
Heard · Agenda item 4 · Room HR C · Adds definition of "nicotine" and expands definition of "tobacco products.
Amendment -1 proposed
Referred to Judiciary.
Introduction and first reading. Referred to President's desk.
“Effective date, June 5, 2026.”
Confirm with the official record.
Supplemental, source-linked analysis from project researchers and community contributors. It is separate from Oregon's official record.